본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외국중재판정의 집행판결에서 나타난 집행거부사유에 관한 고찰

A Review on Refusal Reasons in Enforcing of Foreign Arbitral Awards

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류무역학

초록

Abstract

This article studied on international trade dispute of enforcement procedure of foreign arbitral awards at Korean Supreme Court, which is especially related to New York Convention article 5, The key points of most enforcement procedure were about public policy according New York Convention article 5, 2, b and New York Convention article 5, 1. Particularly, Judgement of public policy from Supreme Court represented that the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award is to present and protect basic moral conviction and social order from spoiling, and not only domestic situation but also international stability of transaction should be taken into consideration in judging on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award, which is construed under certain limitation. In this point, you should be understand the concept on refusal reasons in enforcing of foreign arbitral awards

참고문헌 (16)

  1. "외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행"
  2. "국제중재판정의 집행을 거부하기 위한 사유로서의 공서", 12(1) (2002), 한국중재학회
  3. "외국중재판정의 집행을 거부하기 위한 사유로서의 공서양속 - ILA에서의 논의를 중심으로 -", (294) (1999), 대한상사중재원
  4. "국제상사중재법론" (2003), 도서출판 두남
  5. "외국중재판정의 승인과 집행", 34
  6. "국제중재와 공서문제", (290) (1998), 대한상사중재원
  7. "Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (1991), Sweet & Maxwell
  8. "Public Policy and Arbitrability" (1986), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration
  9. "Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration" (1978)
  10. "The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958"
  11. "대법원 2003. 4. 11. 선고 2001다20134 판결"
  12. "대법원 2003. 2. 26. 선고 2001다77840 판결"
  13. "대법원 2000. 12. 8. 선고 2000다35795 판결"
  14. "대법원 1995. 2. 14. 선고 93다 53054 판결."
  15. "대법원 1990. 4. 10. 선고 89카20252 판결"
  16. "서울고법 2001. 2. 27. 선고 2000나23725판결"

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)