본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the safety of azilsartan and amlodipine combination therapy versus other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and amlodipine in patients with hypertension.METHODS: We conducted a cohort study utilizing healthcare databases from Korea and Taiwan. Patients aged between 18 years and 75 years who were newly prescribed both an ARB and amlodipine within 6 months of hypertension diagnosis were included. Safety outcomes assessed were hypotension, angioedema, acute pancreatitis, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, toxic liver disease, hepatic failure, nausea and vomiting, and fall-related injury. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each safety outcome associated with azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine versus other ARBs combined with amlodipine were calculated within a 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched cohort. Summary HRs across databases were computed using random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTS: We identified 2,472 eligible patients (1,521 from Korea, 951 from Taiwan) initiating treatment with azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine, and 671,468 patients (312,322 from Korea, 355,409 from Taiwan) initiating other ARBs with amlodipine. After PS matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between treatment groups. During the 180-day follow-up, most adverse outcomes did not occur even once in either group, thus precluding the calculation of HRs. The risk of acute pancreatitis was not significantly different between the azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine group and the other ARB and amlodipine groups (summary HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.14 to 5.37).CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort study, azilsartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes compared to other ARBs combined with amlodipine.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the safety of azilsartan and amlodipine combination therapy versus other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and amlodipine in patients with hypertension.METHODS: We conducted a cohort study utilizing healthcare databases from Korea and Taiwan. Patients aged between 18 years and 75 years who were newly prescribed both an ARB and amlodipine within 6 months of hypertension diagnosis were included. Safety outcomes assessed were hypotension, angioedema, acute pancreatitis, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, toxic liver disease, hepatic failure, nausea and vomiting, and fall-related injury. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each safety outcome associated with azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine versus other ARBs combined with amlodipine were calculated within a 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched cohort. Summary HRs across databases were computed using random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTS: We identified 2,472 eligible patients (1,521 from Korea, 951 from Taiwan) initiating treatment with azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine, and 671,468 patients (312,322 from Korea, 355,409 from Taiwan) initiating other ARBs with amlodipine. After PS matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between treatment groups. During the 180-day follow-up, most adverse outcomes did not occur even once in either group, thus precluding the calculation of HRs. The risk of acute pancreatitis was not significantly different between the azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine group and the other ARB and amlodipine groups (summary HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.14 to 5.37).CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort study, azilsartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes compared to other ARBs combined with amlodipine.

관련 논문AI추천

Letter to the Editor: Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort studyZhou Zhanyi한국역학회 · Epidemiology and Health2025 · 제47권 Authors’ Reply: Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study홍빈, Bea Sungho, Chang Zoe Chi-Jui, Cheng Michael Chun-Yuan, Jeong Han Eol, Jung Kyungyeon, Lai Edward Chia-Cheng, Lee Hyesung, Lee Jong-Young, Tzu-Ting Su Chris한국역학회 · Epidemiology and Health2025 · 제47권 Real-world efficacy of fimasartan vs. other angiotensin receptor blockers in combination with calcium channel blockers: a nationwide cohort studyHan Kyung-Do, Kim Bongseong, Kim Hyung-Kwan, Kim Yong-Jin, Lee Heesun, Lee Huijin, Park Chan Soon, Rhee Tae-Min대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2024 · 제30권 Olmesartan is not associated with the risk of enteropathy: a Korean nationwide observational cohort study박래웅, 박수영, 박호준, 유승찬, 윤두경, 정보영대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2019 · 제34권 제1호고혈압 복합제 복용환자에서 동일계열약물 중복 현황구현지, 이지원, 정경혜, 제남경, 최하은한국임상약학회 · 한국임상약학회지2022 · 제32권 제2호레닌-안지오텐신계에 작용하는 항고혈압 약제의 단독요법과 병용요법의 안전성 및 유효성에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰김현경, 최경업한국임상약학회 · 한국임상약학회지2011 · 제21권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (75건)