신속절차에 관한 아시아 4개국의 국제중재규칙 비교 연구 - CIETAC, HKIAC, SIAC, KCAB를 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Expedited Procedures of International Arbitration Rules in Four Asian Countries: CIETAC, HKIAC, SIAC, and KCAB
2
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, many international arbitration institutions have responded to the business requirements of their users and have revised their rules to enhance the time and cost efficiency. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) revised the international arbitration rule in 2011, introducing new arbitration mechanisms like the expedited procedure. Also other Asian arbitration institutions introduced the expedited procedure in their international arbitration rules. Now expedited procedures are regarded as a very attractive system in the field of international arbitration. Accordingly, this paper reviewed the expedited procedures of four Asian countries, including China(CIETAC), Hong Kong (HKIAC), Singapore(SIAC) and Korea(KCAB). The purpose of this study is to find out meaningful implications to improve the Korean system. Based on this review, some recommendations are suggested as follows. First, the scope of the expedited procedure has to be adjusted upward than the current 200 million won. Second, there should be a fee schedule only for the expedited procedure. Third, in case of small amount international disputes, written examination should be more used in the expedited procedure. Finally, KCAB should make strong efforts to improve the awareness and usage of the expedited procedure in Korea.
Abstract
Recently, many international arbitration institutions have responded to the business requirements of their users and have revised their rules to enhance the time and cost efficiency. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) revised the international arbitration rule in 2011, introducing new arbitration mechanisms like the expedited procedure. Also other Asian arbitration institutions introduced the expedited procedure in their international arbitration rules. Now expedited procedures are regarded as a very attractive system in the field of international arbitration. Accordingly, this paper reviewed the expedited procedures of four Asian countries, including China(CIETAC), Hong Kong (HKIAC), Singapore(SIAC) and Korea(KCAB). The purpose of this study is to find out meaningful implications to improve the Korean system. Based on this review, some recommendations are suggested as follows. First, the scope of the expedited procedure has to be adjusted upward than the current 200 million won. Second, there should be a fee schedule only for the expedited procedure. Third, in case of small amount international disputes, written examination should be more used in the expedited procedure. Finally, KCAB should make strong efforts to improve the awareness and usage of the expedited procedure in Korea.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강이수, "국제거래분쟁론 : 상사중재, 전자상거래 분쟁해결" (2010), 삼영사
- 김석철, "상사중재론" (2008), 두남
- 김갑유, "중재실무강의" (2012), 박영사
- 김광수, "국제상사중재의 이론과 실무" (2012), 보명BOOKS
- 김도훈, "국제중재에서의 신속절차에 관한 고찰 - 대한상사중재원의 개정 국제중재규칙을 중심으로 -", 홍익법학, 13(3), pp.691~716 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김상호, "무역클레임과 상사중재" (2008), 두남
- 김재명, "무역클레임과 ADR" (2012), 두남
- 김태훈, "대한상사중재원(KCAB) 중재규칙의 최근 개정내용에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 22(1), pp.3~22 (2012), 한국중재학회
- 김학기, "구술심리의 실무적 고찰 - 변호사 설문을 중심으로 -", 민사소송, 13(1), pp.177~213 (2009), 한국민사소송법학회
- 대한상사중재원, "국제중재규칙해설", 대한상사중재원, ~ (2010)
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 박상조, "국제상사중재법론" (1997), 한올출판사
- 이재영, "무역분쟁의 예방과 해결" (2008), 우용출판사
- 박원형, "대한상사중재원 국제중재규칙의 개정 동향- ICC 중재규칙의 개정과 비교하여 -", 중재연구, 22(2), pp.159~176 (2012), 한국중재학회
- 서세원, "중재판정의 기판력에 관한 고찰A Study on the Res Judicata of Arbitral Awards", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.3~21 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제4권" (2007), 박영사
- 이길상, "대한상사중재원 국제중재인 선정제도의 개선에 관한 연구", 석사, 법학과, pp.2012
- 신군재, "KCAB 개정 국제중재규칙에 관한 고찰", 관세학회지, 13(1), pp.267~280 (2012), 한국관세학회
- 신군재, "KCAB 국제중재규칙과 CIETAC 중재규칙의 비교연구", 중재연구, 18(2), pp.33~54 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 신정식, "ICC중재의 주요특징과 KCAB중재의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구, 33, pp.121~144 (2007), 한국무역상무학회
- 오원석, "국제상사중재에서 중재기관 선택시 고려사항", 무역학회지, 31(1), pp.45~64 (2006), 한국무역학회
- 오원석, "CIETAC(중국국제무역중재위원회)의 중재사건 및 CISG 적용에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 36(3), pp.201~219 (2011), 한국무역학회
- 오현석, "아시아 국가 국제중재 허브로의 도약을 위한 홍콩의 전략", 계간중재, (가을) (2009)
- 우광명, "중국국제경제무역중재위원회의 중재규칙에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 16(1), pp.121~151 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 우성구, "HKIAC에 의한 국제상사중재의 본질과 법적문제", 산업경영 (2003), 경남대학교산업경영연구소
- 이원정, "해사중재에서 런던해사중재인협회(LMAA)와 대한상사중재원(KCAB)간의 소액,신속절차에 관한 비교분석", 한국해법학회지, 34(1), pp.263~290 (2012), 한국해법학회
- American Arbitration Association, "2011 President’s Letter and Financial Statements", ~ (2012)
- Chezie Chuwumerije, "Choice Law in International Commercial Arbitration" (1994), Quorum Books
- Gary B. Born, "International Commercial Arbitration: Commentary and Materials" (2001), Kluwer Law International
- Henny Mardiani, "Arbitration in Singapore", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.217~229 (2006), 한국중재학회
- James H. Carter, "Arbitration Under Expedited Discovery Procedures: What are the sacrifices?" (2011), The Arbitration Review of the Americas
- Lawrence G. S. Boo, "SIAC and Singapore Arbitration", The Asian Business Lawyer, 1 (2008), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- Michael Charles Pryles, "Dispute Resolution in Asia" (2006), Kluwer Law International
- School of International Arbitration, "2010 International Arbitration Survey: Choices in International Arbitration" (2010), Queen Mary, University of London
- ADR : The New Equity, "Thomas O. Main", Bepress Legal Series, ~ (2005)
- "대한상사중재원"[URL]
- "홍콩국제중재센터"[URL]
- "싱가포르국제중재센터"[URL]
- "중국국제경제무역중재위원회"[URL]