본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Recent Debates in Attorney-Client related Privilege and Confidentiality in Korea and Its Implications to International Arbitration

김준기
한국중재학회 (Korean Association Of Arbitration Studies(Kaas))|2023.09|중재연구 (JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES)|제33권 제3호|pp. 3-30

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

confidentialitysecrecyattorney-client privilegelegal professional privilegelegal impedimentwork product privilegelegal advice privilegelitigation privilegesettlement privilege
주제분류무역학

초록

This article provides an overview of the state of attorney-client related privilege and confidentiality in Korea. It reviews the statutory framework, and how Korean courts have analyzed the privilege and confidentiality related to attorneys and their clients. It then examines the legislative initiatives Korea is currently debating with regard to adopting a more common law-style attorney-client privilege (ACP). If adopted, the new legislation will mark a significant milestone in providing guidance on how communications between attorney and client will be treated. Its impact in the context of international arbitration practice and law related to Korea is explored.

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the state of attorney-client related privilege and confidentiality in Korea. It reviews the statutory framework, and how Korean courts have analyzed the privilege and confidentiality related to attorneys and their clients. It then examines the legislative initiatives Korea is currently debating with regard to adopting a more common law-style attorney-client privilege (ACP). If adopted, the new legislation will mark a significant milestone in providing guidance on how communications between attorney and client will be treated. Its impact in the context of international arbitration practice and law related to Korea is explored.

참고문헌 (87)

  1. "Statutes and Rules", ~
  2. "Korean Constitution", ~
  3. "Korean Arbitration Act", ~
  4. "Korean Attorney-at-Law Act", ~
  5. "Korean Civil Procedure Act", ~
  6. "Korean Criminal Procedure Act", ~
  7. "Korean Foreign Legal Consultant Act", ~
  8. "Foreign Legal Consultant Code of Ethics", ~
  9. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board, "International Arbitration Rules", ~ (2016)
  10. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board, "Domestic Arbitration Rules", ~ (2016)
  11. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board, "Code of Ethics for Arbitrators", ~ (2016)
  12. "Elliott Associates v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-51, Procedural Order No. 4, 22 July 2019"[URL]
  13. "Elliott Associates v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-51, Procedural Order No. 7, 20 November 2019"[URL]
  14. "Elliott Associates v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-51, Procedural Order No. 8, 13 January 2020"[URL]
  15. "Elliott Associates v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-51, Procedural Order No. 14, 24 June 2020"[URL]
  16. "Elliott Associates v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-51, Procedural Order No. 16, 7 August 2020"[URL]
  17. "Elliott v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-51, Procedural Order No. 17, 4 September 2020"[URL]
  18. "Mason Capital L.P. and Mason Management LLC v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-55, Procedural Order No. 5, 15 January 2021"[URL]
  19. "Mason Capital L.P. and Mason Management LLC v Republic of Korea, PCA Case No. 2018-55, Procedural Order No. 11, 8 July 2022"[URL]
  20. "2000 HunMa 138, 23 September 2004 (Constitutional Court)", ~
  21. "2008 No 2778, 26 June 2009 (Seoul High Court)", ~ (2009)
  22. "2009 Do 6788, 17 May 2012 (Supreme Court)", ~ (2012)
  23. "2012 HunMa 610, 30 July 2015 (Constitutional Court)", ~ (2015)
  24. "2020 GoHap 496, 13 January 2021 (Suwon District Court)", ~ (2021)
  25. "2020 HunMa 1030, 23 February 2023 (Constitutional Court)", ~ (2023)
  26. "2021 Bo 2, 11 May 2022 (Seoul District Court)", ~ (2022)
  27. "Forum on the Guarantee of the Right of Audience and ACP", Korean Bar Association, ~ (2016)
  28. "Forum Concerning Attorney-related Right to Confidentiality", National Assembly Member Na Kyung-won and Korean Bar Association, ~ (2017)
  29. "Policy Debate Forum on the Adoption of ACP", National Assembly Member Cho Eung Cheon and Korean Bar Association, ~ (2019)
  30. "IPBA Guidelines on Privilege and Attorney Secrecy in International Arbitration with Commentary 2019", Inter-Pacific Bar Association, ~ (2019)
  31. "Legislative Forum on ACP", National Assembly Member Cho Eung Cheon and Korean Bar Association, ~ (2020)
  32. "Symposium on the Adoption of ACP", National Assembly Member Chung Woo-taik and Cho Eung Cheon, and Seoul Bar Association, ~ (2023)
  33. 안건형, "Confidentiality and the Riddick Principle in International Commercial Arbitration", 중재연구, 31(3), pp.43~68 (2021), 한국중재학회
  34. Bae, "Arbitration Law of Korea: Practice and Procedure", Juris, ~ (2012)
  35. Baker, "Global Attorney-Client Privilege Guide, 4th Ed", ~ (2022)
  36. Baumberger, Marc, "TagTime with Samaa Haridi – Legal Privilege in International Commercial Arbitration", ARIA Blog, ~ (2021)
  37. Berger, Klaus Peter, "Evidentiary Privileges: Best Practice Standards versus", and Arbitral Discretion, 2006, pp.22, 501~
  38. Born, Gary, "International Commercial Arbitration" (2021), Kluwer
  39. 최병천, "변호사의 증언 및 압수 거부권과 변호사-의뢰인 특권", 형사정책, 34(4), pp.359~391 (2023), 한국형사정책학회
  40. 최광선, "프랑스의 변호사 비밀유지의무", 비교사법, 28(4), pp.129~169 (2021), 한국사법학회[DOI]
  41. 정준혁, "사내변호사에 대한 비밀유지권 도입 검토-기업범죄 억제를 위한 컴플라이언스 강화를 중심으로", 형사정책, 32(4), pp.103~155 (2021), 한국형사정책학회
  42. "Legal Professional Privilege: Global Guide"[URL]
  43. Dumanova, Madina, "A Solution to Issues of Privilege In International Arbitration? The IPBA Guidelines", Oblin Publication, ~ (2022)
  44. Franck, Susan D, "International Arbitration and Attorney-Client Privilege - A Conflict of Laws Approach", Arizona State Law Journal, 51(3) (2019)
  45. Goldberg, Karina, "Privilege and document production in International Arbitration", Chambers and Partners Article, ~ (2021)
  46. 하정철, "변호사의 비밀유지의무: 예외 사유인 ‘공익상의 이유’를 중심으로", 법학논고, (47), pp.571~600 (2014), 법학연구원[DOI]
  47. 한애라, "의뢰인-변호사 간 비밀유지권에 관한 검토 및 개선방향", 법조, 68(4), pp.230~265 (2019), 법조협회[DOI]
  48. 허진성, "변호인의 변호권에 대한 헌법적 이해", 공법연구, 46(4), pp.187~211 (2018), 한국공법학회
  49. 정상민, "독일에서의 변호사의 비밀유지의무", 인권과 정의, (502), pp.52~72 (2021), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  50. 정상민, "기업의 내부조사와 변호사의 비밀유지권 - 독일연방헌법재판소의 폭스바겐-존스데이 결정을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (514), pp.141~163 (2023), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  51. 정상민, "자금세탁방지를 위한 내부조사와 변호사의 직무상 비밀 - 스위스 연방대법원의 결정례를 중심으로 -", 국제법무, 14(2), pp.241~283 (2022), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
  52. 김현수, "변호사의 비밀유지의무와 권리에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, 177, pp.411~435 (2020), 한국법학원[DOI]
  53. 김효성, "국내 경쟁법 절차에 비밀유지권 도입 검토 - 일본의 제도를 중심으로 -", 경쟁법연구, 42, pp.120~146 (2020), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
  54. Kim, Joongi, "International Arbitration in Korea" (2017), Oxford University Press
  55. 김태봉, "변호사의 비밀유지의무", 법학논총, 36(4), pp.257~289 (2016), 법학연구소
  56. 공영호, "A Comparative Study of the Attorney Ethics Rules of Korea and the U.S. and the Application of Ethics Rules in Cross-Border Legal Representations", 법학논총, 34(3), pp.297~323 (2017), 법학연구소[DOI]
  57. 이형근, "변호인의 신문참여에 관한 하위 법령·규칙 비교연구", 법조, 69(3), pp.83~118 (2020), 법조협회[DOI]
  58. Lee, Jae-Sang, "Cases of Criminal Procedure" (2013), Park-Young Publishing Company
  59. 이상훈, "형사절차에서 변호사-의뢰인 간 의사교환의 비밀보장을 위한 입법적 개선방안 - 프랑스 형사소송법이 우리에게 주는 시사점을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 33(2), pp.41~80 (2022), 법학연구소[DOI]
  60. A Study on Protecting Confidentiality of Communications between an Attorney and the Client - Focusing on the Criminal Proceedings, "Lee, Sanghoon", Judicial Policy Research Institute, ~ (2022)
  61. A Study on Protecting Confidentiality of Communications between an Attorney and the Client, "Lee, Sanghoon", Judicial Policy Research Institute, ~ (2022)
  62. 이태영, "변호사의 비밀유지의무", 인권과 정의, (469), pp.22~41 (2017), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  63. Lim, Sung Woo, "International Arbitration" (2016), Bakyoungsa
  64. 류병운, "국제중재에서의 투명성과 기밀성의 경계(境界)", 서울법학, 26(3), pp.613~656 (2018), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
  65. Meyer-Hauser, Bernhard F., "Anwaltsgeheimnis und Schiedsgericht" (2004), Schulthess Verlag
  66. Mockesch, Annabelle, "torney-Client Privilege in International Arbitration" (2017), Oxford University Press
  67. 남수진, "Back to Fundamentals: A Closer Look at a Seoul High Court’s Failed Attempt to Introduce Attorney-Client Privilege in Korea", Journal of Korean Law, 16(1), pp.230~261 (2016), 아시아태평양법연구소[DOI]
  68. 박찬동, "국제상사중재의 비밀유지의무에 관한 연구", 국제거래법연구, 25(1), pp.3~29 (2016), 국제거래법학회
  69. 박찬운, "변호인참여권의 현실과 문제점 그리고 활성화를 위한 제안", 인권과 정의, (453), pp.57~75 (2015), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  70. Pearce, Ted P., "How to Handle Privileged Communications in International Arbitration", International Bar Association, ~ (2023)
  71. Reiser, Rachel, "Applying Privilege in International Arbitration: The Case for a Uniform Rule", Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(2) (2012)
  72. Rogers, Catherine, "Ethics in International Arbitration" (2014), Oxford University Press
  73. A Study on the Attorney-Client Privilege, "Seo Jooyeon", Korean Institute of Criminology, ~, pp.20-AB-09 (2020)
  74. Shehata, Ibrahim, "Attorney-Client Privilege & International Arbitration", Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2019)
  75. Shehata, Ibrahim, "The Standard of Attorney-Client Privilege In International Arbitration:Is The “Most Protective Law” The Right Answer?", Kluwer Arbitration Blog, ~ (2018)
  76. 신상민, "辯護士의 助力權을 制限한 行政節次의 違法性", 행정판례연구, 24(2), pp.125~167 (2019), 한국행정판례연구회
  77. Shin, Seung-Nam, "Case Study of Korean-French Companies Dispute at the Arbitration Stage in the ICC Arbitral Tribunal and at the Enforcement Stage in the Korean Court", Journal of Arbitration Studies, 18(1) (2008)
  78. 신이철, "형사증거법상 변호인 작성 법률검토 의견서의 증거능력 - 변호인­-의뢰인 특권 도입여부와 관련하여 -", 형사법의 신동향, (64), pp.1~42 (2019), 대검찰청[DOI]
  79. Siegal, David, "Protecting Privileges in Cross-Border Investigations", Litigation, 42(4) (2016)
  80. 손창완, "미국법상 비닉권(祕匿權)과 변호사·의뢰인 간 의사교환의 보호", 인권과 정의, (485), pp.6~29 (2019), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  81. 송재우, "변호사의 소송 수행 제한에 대한 소고- 사내변호사를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 59(2), pp.321~345 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
  82. The Sedona Conference, "Commentary on Cross-Border Privilege Issues", The Sedona Conference Journal, 23(475) (2022)
  83. Wachter, Robert, "Confidentiality in International IP Arbitration", IAM, ~ (2021)
  84. Wachter, Robert, "Toward a codified evidentiary attorney-client privilege in Korea", Lex Mundi, ~ (2022)
  85. Yoon, B.C., "The Legal System for International Arbitration of Korea", Korean Arbitration Review, (4) (2014)
  86. Yoon, Hye Won, "The Right of Attorneys to Defend Their Defendants as a Basic Right: The Constitutional Court decision 2016 Hun-Ma 503, decided November 30, 2017", SNU Law Review, 9 (2019)
  87. 윤종행, "변호사와 의뢰인간 상담내용의 비밀보호에 관한 세계 각국의 입법례와 시사점", 법학연구, 32(2), pp.261~298 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Back to Fundamentals: A Closer Look at a Seoul High Court’s Failed Attempt to Introduce Attorney-Client Privilege in Korea남수진아시아태평양법연구소 · Journal of Korean Law2016 · 제16권 제1호A Comparative Study of the Attorney Ethics Rules of Korea and the U.S. and the Application of Ethics Rules in Cross-Border Legal Representations공영호법학연구원 · 법학논총2017 · 제34권 제3호A Review of Arbitrator Disclosure Obligations in Korea through the Oilhub Case김준기한국중재학회 · 중재연구2020 · 제30권 제3호Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub김재현, Bryan E. Hopkins한국중재학회 · 중재연구2016 · 제26권 제3호Judicial Assistance in Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration전정원한국상사판례학회 · 상사판례연구2019 · 제32권 제2호한국중재법의 현황과 과제조대연한국중재학회 · 중재연구2003 · 제12권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

The French approach to enforcement of arbitral awards, international public policy and corruptionSamantha Natafpp. 31-68ENFORCING RIGHTS OVER DIGITAL ASSETSChan Leng Sunpp. 69-93Third-Party Funding as a Panacea for an Amicable Adjudication of International Arbitration Disputes in Nigeria under the Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023Clement Ighodargho OSUYApp. 95-106Adverse Inferences as Sanctions in International Arbitration전정원pp. 107-128Arbitrator’s Reputation and PR Cost: A Signaling Approach김성룡, 권준엽pp. 129-146
원문 보기