본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Myringoplasty Outcomes From a 5-Year Single Surgeon’s Experience and Important Surgical Technical Aspects

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Objectives: The United Kingdom (UK) national standard for the closure rate for myringoplasty is 89.5% (90.6% and 84.2% for primary and revision surgeries, respectively). The average hearing gains for primary and revision myringoplasty are 9.14 dB and 7.86 dB, respectively. This study compared the myringoplasty outcomes for a single surgeon over 5 years.Subjects and Methods: Data for 68 cases were analyzed retrospectively. The outcome measures were achievement of the tympanic membrane closure and the average hearing gain or loss.Results: The overall and primary closure rates were 97% and 98%, respectively and significantly higher than the UK national standard (p=0.0210 and p=0.0287, respectively). The revision closure rate was 93%; however, it was not significantly higher than the national standard (p=0.1872). The average hearing gain was 5.18 dB. The gains for primary and revision surgeries were 5.15 dB and 5.25 dB, respectively.Conclusions: We propose that these outcomes are a result of our surgical technique, including the simultaneous use of cortical mastoidectomy in ears with discharge.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The United Kingdom (UK) national standard for the closure rate for myringoplasty is 89.5% (90.6% and 84.2% for primary and revision surgeries, respectively). The average hearing gains for primary and revision myringoplasty are 9.14 dB and 7.86 dB, respectively. This study compared the myringoplasty outcomes for a single surgeon over 5 years.Subjects and Methods: Data for 68 cases were analyzed retrospectively. The outcome measures were achievement of the tympanic membrane closure and the average hearing gain or loss.Results: The overall and primary closure rates were 97% and 98%, respectively and significantly higher than the UK national standard (p=0.0210 and p=0.0287, respectively). The revision closure rate was 93%; however, it was not significantly higher than the national standard (p=0.1872). The average hearing gain was 5.18 dB. The gains for primary and revision surgeries were 5.15 dB and 5.25 dB, respectively.Conclusions: We propose that these outcomes are a result of our surgical technique, including the simultaneous use of cortical mastoidectomy in ears with discharge.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Phillips JS, "Myringoplasty outcomes in the UK", J Laryngol Otol, 129, pp.860~864 (2015)
  2. von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology(STROBE)statement : guidelines for reporting observational studies", Ann Intern Med, 147, pp.573~577 (2007)
  3. Chidlow C, "Practice patterns in myringoplasty surgery among Australian surgeons", Aust J Otolaryngol, 3, pp.28~ (2020)
  4. Hirsch BE, "Operative Otolaryngology:Head and Neck Surgery", pp.1133~1145 (2008), WB Saunders
  5. Aggarwal R, "Myringoplasty", J Laryngol Otol, 120, pp.429~432 (2006)
  6. Salvador P, "Type I tympanoplasty: surgical success and prognostic factors", Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp(Engl Ed), 72, pp.182~189 (2021)
  7. Patil K, "Evaluation of different graft material in type 1 tympanoplasty", Indian J Otol, 20, pp.106~ (2014)
  8. Odat H, "Success rate of type 1tympanoplasty : a comparative study", J Laryngol Otol, 135, pp.315~319 (2021)
  9. Kulduk E, "Treatment of large tympanic membrane perforations : medial to malleus versus lateral to malleus", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 67, pp.173~179 (2015)
  10. Gersdorff M, "Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Comparative study of 122 cases", Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol(Bord), 124, pp.15~22 (2003)
  11. de Savornin Lohman EAJ, "Transmeatal tympanoplasty of subtotal and anterior perforations : a single-institution experience including 94 patients", Clin Otolaryngol, 42, pp.920~923 (2017)
  12. Khawaja M, "Comparison of graft uptake by underlay and overlay technique in myringoplasty", J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 32(Suppl 1), pp.S640~S643 (2020)
  13. Sharp JF, "Myringoplasty for the anterior perforation : experience with the Kerr flap", J Laryngol Otol, 106, pp.14~16 (1992)
  14. Tos M., "Manual of middle ear surgery", pp.5~ (1993), Thieme
  15. McGrew BM, "Impact of mastoidectomy on simple tympanic membrane perforation repair", Laryngoscope, 114, pp.506~511 (2004)
  16. Albu S, "Usefulness of cortical mastoidectomy in myringoplasty", Otol Neurotol, 33, pp.604~609 (2012)
  17. Vaidya S, "Study of outcome of tympanoplasties in relation to size and site of tympanic membrane perforation", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 66, pp.341~346 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Short- and Long-term Hearing Outcomes of Successful Inlay Cartilage Tympanoplasty Between Small and Large Eardrum PerforationsChi-Che Huang, Chien-Chia Huang, Pei-Wen Wu, Ta-Jen Lee, Wen-Hung Wang대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2015 · 제8권 제4호Swing-Door Overlay Tympanoplasty: Surgical Technique and Outcomes김동기, 박소영, 박시내, 서병도, 심명주, 이혁재대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2018 · 제11권 제3호Can Endoscopic Tympanoplasty Be a Good Alternative to Microscopic Tympanoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis김영호, 서유주, 이도영, 이상연대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2019 · 제12권 제2호Outcomes of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty for Large Perforations: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in South Korea강우석, 공수근, 문인석, 문일준, 이일우, 이종대, 정종우, 조형호, 최성원, 최지은, 허동구대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2023 · 제16권 제2호Endoscopic “Push-Trough” Technique Cartilage Myringoplasty in Anterior Tympanic Membrane PerforationsDerya Oztuna, Erdal Samim, Hatice Celik대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2015 · 제8권 제3호Cartilage Graft in Myringoplasty: What Are the Factors Influencing Hearing Gain?Bouatay Rachida, Bouaziz Nawress, Ferjaoui Mahdi, Harrathi Khaled, Kolsi Naourez, Koubaa Jamel대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2022 · 제26권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)