본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Bowtie Methos-based Risk-management for Tunnel Construction

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류자원공학

초록

This study analyzed 250 tunnel incidents—46 from Korea and 204 from other parts of the world—to identify key geotechnical hazards associated with tunnel construction and implementing risk-management strategies. The identified hazards included portal-area issues, main sections situated in discontinuity or weak zones, shallow depths and valley areas, and post-face advance sections. The bowtie method was used to visualize specific events, treatments, and consequences pertaining to each hazard, and identify the relevant barriers and control measures. The bowtie risk-management model is a comprehensive approach for risk identification, assessment, and control. Thus, this study aims to enhance tunnel-construction safety by offering practical and effective risk-management and prevention strategies.

Abstract

This study analyzed 250 tunnel incidents—46 from Korea and 204 from other parts of the world—to identify key geotechnical hazards associated with tunnel construction and implementing risk-management strategies. The identified hazards included portal-area issues, main sections situated in discontinuity or weak zones, shallow depths and valley areas, and post-face advance sections. The bowtie method was used to visualize specific events, treatments, and consequences pertaining to each hazard, and identify the relevant barriers and control measures. The bowtie risk-management model is a comprehensive approach for risk identification, assessment, and control. Thus, this study aims to enhance tunnel-construction safety by offering practical and effective risk-management and prevention strategies.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. CGE Risk, "BowTieXP quick start manual", 9~10 (2012)
  2. Department of Minerals Resources, "How to conduct a risk assessment of mine operations and equipment and how to manage the risks, Risk Management handbook for the mining industry", NSW department of Primary industries, 13~15 (1997)
  3. Ericson, C. A., "Hazard analysis techniques for system safety" (2005), John Wiley & Sons
  4. Sahu, H. B., "Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in mining industry : a case study", 34th International conference of safety in mines research institutes, pp.467~480 (2011), India Habitat Centre
  5. Han, B., "Safety risk assessment of loess tunnel construction under complex environment based on game theory-cloud model", Scientific Reports, 13(12249), pp.1~18 (2023)
  6. Hardy, T. L., "Using accident reports to improve the hazard identification process", 28th International System Safety Conference (2010)
  7. Korean Tunnel Association, "Case histories of tunnel collapse", CIR Ltd, ~ (2010)
  8. Michalsen, A., "Risk assessment and perception", International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 10(4), pp.201~204 (2010)
  9. Introduction of Systematic Safety Assessment Techniques to the Underground Coal Industry, "O’Beirne, T. J.", NSW Coal Association, 114~, pp.NERDDC Project 1068 Final Report (1990)
  10. Rita L. Sousa, "Risk analysis for tunneling projects", Ph. D, pp.2010
  11. Rita L. Sousa, "Risk Analysis During Tunnel Construction Using Bayesian Networks:Porto Metro Case Study", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 27(1), pp.86~100 (2012)
  12. Wu, P., "Multiscale evaluation of tunnel construction safety risk: a case study of an ofshore tunnel construction in Ningbo", Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 71(108), pp.1~20 (2024)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)