No observed effect of a student-led mock objective structured clinical examination on subsequent performance scores in medical students in Canada
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Student-led peer-assisted mock objective structured clinical examinations (MOSCEs) have been used in various settings to help students prepare for subsequent higher-stakes, faculty-run OSCEs. MOSCE participants generally valued feedback from peers and reported benefits to learning. Our study investigated whether participation in a peer-assisted MOSCE affected subsequent OSCE performance. To determine whether mean OSCE scores differed depending on whether medical students participated in the MOSCE, we conducted a between-subjects analysis of variance, with cohort (2016 vs. 2017) and MOSCE participation (MOSCE vs. no MOSCE) as independent variables and the mean OSCE score as the dependent variable. Participation in the MOSCE had no influence on mean OSCE scores (P=0.19). There was a significant correlation between mean MOSCE scores and mean OSCE scores (Pearson r=0.52, P<0.001). Although previous studies described self-reported benefits from participation in student-led MOSCEs, it was not associated with objective benefits in this study.
Abstract
Student-led peer-assisted mock objective structured clinical examinations (MOSCEs) have been used in various settings to help students prepare for subsequent higher-stakes, faculty-run OSCEs. MOSCE participants generally valued feedback from peers and reported benefits to learning. Our study investigated whether participation in a peer-assisted MOSCE affected subsequent OSCE performance. To determine whether mean OSCE scores differed depending on whether medical students participated in the MOSCE, we conducted a between-subjects analysis of variance, with cohort (2016 vs. 2017) and MOSCE participation (MOSCE vs. no MOSCE) as independent variables and the mean OSCE score as the dependent variable. Participation in the MOSCE had no influence on mean OSCE scores (P=0.19). There was a significant correlation between mean MOSCE scores and mean OSCE scores (Pearson r=0.52, P<0.001). Although previous studies described self-reported benefits from participation in student-led MOSCEs, it was not associated with objective benefits in this study.
참고문헌 (7)
- Adam Slomer, "Does Test-enhanced Learning Improve Success Rates of Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Intravenous Insertion? A Randomized Controlled Trial", AEM Education and Training, 1(4), pp.310~315 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
- Debra Pugh, "How do formative objective structured clinical examinations drive learning? Analysis of residents’ perceptions", Medical Teacher, 40(1), pp.45~52 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Rishad Khan, "Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: A scoping review", Medical Teacher, 39(7), pp.745~756 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Claire B. Lee, "A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience", Medical Education Online, 23(1), pp.1440111~ (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Karima Khamisa, "The implementation and evaluation of an e-Learning training module for objective structured clinical examination raters in Canada", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 15, pp.18~ (2018), Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute[DOI]
- "Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination part II" (2018)[URL]
- Susan Humphrey-Murto, "Feedback in the OSCE: What Do Residents Remember?", Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 28(1), pp.52~60 (2016), Informa UK Limited[DOI]