Evaluation of student perceptions with 2 interprofessional assessment tools—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale—following didactic and clinical learning experiences in the United States
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts. Methods: Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year. Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart, while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly. For the baseline and post-cohort assessments, 865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS. The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the baseline and post-cohort assessments. Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores. For each score, 3 comparisons were made simultaneously: overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort, overall baseline versus post-clinical cohort, and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort. Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons. Results: The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS, respectively. The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores. No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score. Conclusion: The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts. Methods: Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year. Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart, while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly. For the baseline and post-cohort assessments, 865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS. The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the baseline and post-cohort assessments. Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores. For each score, 3 comparisons were made simultaneously: overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort, overall baseline versus post-clinical cohort, and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort. Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons. Results: The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS, respectively. The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores. No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score. Conclusion: The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.
참고문헌 (16)
- Joseph Zorek, "Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA: A comparative analysis", Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(2), pp.123~130 (2012), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Barbara Barzansky, "Medical Schools in the United States, 2017-2018", JAMA, 320(10), pp.1042~1050 (2018), American Medical Association (AMA)[DOI]
- Frederick Chen, "The current state of academic centers for interprofessional education", Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5), pp.497~498 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Conor Gilligan, "Recommendations from recent graduates in medicine, nursing and pharmacy on improving interprofessional education in university programs: a qualitative study", BMC Medical Education, 14(1), pp.52~ (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Mayumi A. Willgerodt, "Interprofessional education and practice guide No. 4: Developing and sustaining interprofessional education at an academic health center", Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5), pp.421~425 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Courtney West, "Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools: Common practices, barriers and facilitators", Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 4, pp.41~49 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Rachel D. Havyer, "Addressing the Interprofessional Collaboration Competencies of the Association of American Medical Colleges", Academic Medicine, 91(6), pp.865~888 (2016), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel, "Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert panel", Interprofessional Education Collaborative, ~ (2011)
- Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update, "Interprofessional Education Collaborative", Interprofessional Education Collaborative, ~ (2016)
- Jeffrey Norris, "The Development and Validation of the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale", Academic Medicine, 90(10), pp.1394~1400 (2015), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Hollar D, "Concurrent validation of CHIRP, a new instrument for measuring healthcare student attitudes towards interdisciplinary teamwork", J Appl Meas, 13, pp.360~375 (2012)
- JoLaine Reierson Draugalis, "Best Practices for Survey Research Reports Revisited: Implications of Target Population, Probability Sampling, and Response Rate", American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(8), pp.142~ (2009), American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education[DOI]
- Andrew J. Muzyk, "An Interprofessional Course on Substance Use Disorders for Health Professions Students", Academic Medicine, 92(12), pp.1704~1708 (2017), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- C. Hobgood, "Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration", BMJ Quality & Safety, 19(6), pp.e25~e25 (2010), BMJ[DOI]
- Sarah Yardley, "Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’", Medical Education, 46(1), pp.97~106 (2012), Wiley[DOI]
- "BEME coding sheet" (2012)[URL]