본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Perceptions of team-based learning using the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument: an exploratory analysis amongst pharmacy and biomedical students in the United Kingdom

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate students’ perception of team-based learning (TBL) amongst a cohort exposed to this methodology for the first time at a university in the United Kingdom. MethodsBetween November and December 2018, 26 first-year Master of Pharmacy and 90 second-year Biomedical Science students of the School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, United Kingdom were invited to participate and requested to complete a questionnaire that contained quantitative and qualitative questions. The quantitative component was based on the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI). It additionally contained questions about key student characteristics. ResultsThe response rate was 60% (70 of 116); of the participants, 74% (n=52) were females and 26% (n=18) males. The percentage of agreement in the TBL-SAI suggested a favourable response to TBL. The overall mean score for the TBL-SAI was 115.6 (standard deviation, 5.6; maximum score, 140), which was above the threshold of 102, thus suggesting a preference for TBL. Statistically significant differences were not found according to demographic characteristics. Students who predicted a final grade of ≥70% strongly agreed that TBL helped improve their grades. Some students highlighted issues with working in teams, and only 56% of students agreed that they could learn better in a team setting. ConclusionThis study shows that students exposed to TBL for the first time favoured several aspects of TBL. However, more focused strategies including team-building activities and expert facilitation skills could potentially tackle resistance to working in teams.

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate students’ perception of team-based learning (TBL) amongst a cohort exposed to this methodology for the first time at a university in the United Kingdom. MethodsBetween November and December 2018, 26 first-year Master of Pharmacy and 90 second-year Biomedical Science students of the School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, United Kingdom were invited to participate and requested to complete a questionnaire that contained quantitative and qualitative questions. The quantitative component was based on the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI). It additionally contained questions about key student characteristics. ResultsThe response rate was 60% (70 of 116); of the participants, 74% (n=52) were females and 26% (n=18) males. The percentage of agreement in the TBL-SAI suggested a favourable response to TBL. The overall mean score for the TBL-SAI was 115.6 (standard deviation, 5.6; maximum score, 140), which was above the threshold of 102, thus suggesting a preference for TBL. Statistically significant differences were not found according to demographic characteristics. Students who predicted a final grade of ≥70% strongly agreed that TBL helped improve their grades. Some students highlighted issues with working in teams, and only 56% of students agreed that they could learn better in a team setting. ConclusionThis study shows that students exposed to TBL for the first time favoured several aspects of TBL. However, more focused strategies including team-building activities and expert facilitation skills could potentially tackle resistance to working in teams.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Larry Michaelsen, "The essential elements of team-based learning", New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(116), pp.7~27 (2008), Wiley[DOI]
  2. Tyler Reimschisel, "A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education", Medical Teacher, 39(12), pp.1227~1237 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  3. Jonathan Branney, "A mixed methods evaluation of team-based learning for applied pathophysiology in undergraduate nursing education", Nurse Education Today, 61, pp.127~133 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  4. Leanne Marie Nation, "The applicability of a validated team-based learning student assessment instrument to assess United Kingdom pharmacy students’ attitude toward team-based learning", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 13, pp.30~ (2016), Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute[DOI]
  5. Matthew Greetham, "Instilling collaborative and reflective practice in engineers: using a team-based learning strategy to prepare students for working in project teams", Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), pp.510~521 (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  6. Heidi A. Mennenga, "Development and Psychometric Testing of the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument", Nurse Educator, 37(4), pp.168~172 (2012), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  7. Franz Faul, "G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences", Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), pp.175~191 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  8. Geoff Norman, "Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics", Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), pp.625~632 (2010), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  9. Lucas M. Jeno, "The Relative Effect of Team-Based Learning on Motivation and Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective", CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), pp.ar59~ (2017), American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)[DOI]
  10. Anita Sharma, "Understanding the early effects of team-based learning on student accountability and engagement using a three session TBL pilot", Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(5), pp.802~807 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  11. Beven Livingston, "Physical therapy students’ perceptions of team-based learning in gross anatomy using the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 11, pp.1~ (2014), Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute[DOI]
  12. Dean Parmelee, "Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65", Medical Teacher, 34(5), pp.e275~e287 (2012), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  13. Nagaswami S. Vasan, "Team-based learning in anatomy: An efficient, effective, and economical strategy", Anatomical Sciences Education, 4(6), pp.333~339 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
  14. Adam S. Obad, "Assessment of first-year medical students’ perceptions of teaching and learning through team-based learning sessions", Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), pp.536~542 (2016), American Physiological Society[DOI]
  15. Lindsay K. Davidson, "A 3-year experience implementing blended TBL: Active instructional methods can shift student attitudes to learning", Medical Teacher, 33(9), pp.750~753 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (40건)