Priorities in updating training paradigms in orthopedic manual therapy: an international Delphi study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose Orthopedic manual therapy (OMT) education demonstrates significant variability between philosophies and while literature has offered a more comprehensive understanding of the contextual, patient specific, and technique factors which interact to influence outcome, most OMT training paradigms continue to emphasize the mechanical basis for OMT application. The purpose of this study was to establish consensus on modifications & adaptions to training paradigms which need to occur within OMT education to align with current evidence. Methods A 3-round Delphi survey instrument designed to identify foundational knowledge to include and omit from OMT education was completed by 28 educators working within high level manual therapy education programs internationally. Round 1 consisted of open-ended questions to identify content in each area. Round 2 and Round 3 allowed participants to rank the themes identified in Round 1. Results Consensus was reached on 25 content areas to include within OMT education, 1 content area to omit from OMT education, and 34 knowledge components which should be present in those providing OMT. Support was seen for education promoting understanding the complex psychological, neurophysiological, and biomechanical systems as they relate to both evaluation and treatment effect. While some concepts were more consistently supported there was significant variability in responses which is largely expected to be related to previous training. Conclusion The results of this study indicate manual therapy educators understanding of evidence-based practice as support for all 3 tiers of evidence were represented. The results of this study should guide OMT training program development and modification.
Abstract
Purpose Orthopedic manual therapy (OMT) education demonstrates significant variability between philosophies and while literature has offered a more comprehensive understanding of the contextual, patient specific, and technique factors which interact to influence outcome, most OMT training paradigms continue to emphasize the mechanical basis for OMT application. The purpose of this study was to establish consensus on modifications & adaptions to training paradigms which need to occur within OMT education to align with current evidence. Methods A 3-round Delphi survey instrument designed to identify foundational knowledge to include and omit from OMT education was completed by 28 educators working within high level manual therapy education programs internationally. Round 1 consisted of open-ended questions to identify content in each area. Round 2 and Round 3 allowed participants to rank the themes identified in Round 1. Results Consensus was reached on 25 content areas to include within OMT education, 1 content area to omit from OMT education, and 34 knowledge components which should be present in those providing OMT. Support was seen for education promoting understanding the complex psychological, neurophysiological, and biomechanical systems as they relate to both evaluation and treatment effect. While some concepts were more consistently supported there was significant variability in responses which is largely expected to be related to previous training. Conclusion The results of this study indicate manual therapy educators understanding of evidence-based practice as support for all 3 tiers of evidence were represented. The results of this study should guide OMT training program development and modification.
참고문헌 (15)
- Namnaqani FI, "The effectiveness of McKenzie method compared to manual therapy for treating chronic low back pain : a systematic review", J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 19, pp.492~499 (2019)
- Voogt L, "Analgesic effects of manual therapy in patients with musculoskeletal pain : a systematic review", Man Ther, 20, pp.250~256 (2015)[DOI]
- Kolb WH, "The evolution of manual therapy education: what are we waiting for?", J Man Manip Ther, 28, pp.1~3 (2020)[DOI]
- Slaven EJ, "The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion : results of a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Man Manip Ther, 21, pp.7~17 (2013)[DOI]
- Nim CG, "The importance of selecting the correct site to apply spinal manipulation when treating spinal pain : myth or reality? : a systematic review", Sci Rep, 11, pp.23415~ (2021)[DOI]
- Watanabe N, "Mechanisms and effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine for pain management", Front Pain Res(Lausanne), 3, pp.863751~ (2022)[DOI]
- Testa M, "Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo : how contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes", Man Ther, 24, pp.65~74 (2016)[DOI]
- Junger S, "Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies(CREDES)in palliative care : recommendations based on a methodological systematic review", Palliat Med, 31, pp.684~706 (2017)[DOI]
- Nasa P, "Delphi methodology in healthcare research : how to decide its appropriateness", World J Methodol, 11, pp.116~129 (2021)[DOI]
- Humphrey-Murto S, "Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research", Med Teach, 39, pp.14~19 (2017)[DOI]
- Palmlof L, "Expectations of recovery : a prognostic factor in patients with neck pain undergoing manual therapy treatment", Eur J Pain, 20, pp.1384~1391 (2016)[DOI]
- Bialosky JE, "Unraveling the mechanisms of manual therapy : modeling an approach", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 48, pp.8~18 (2018)[DOI]
- Lin I, "What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? : eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines : systematic review", Br J Sports Med, 54, pp.79~86 (2020)[DOI]
- Guillaud A, "Reliability of diagnosis and clinical efficacy of visceral osteopathy : a systematic review", BMC Complement Altern Med, 18, pp.65~ (2018)[DOI]
- Zadro J, "Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? : systematic review", BMJ Open, 9, pp.e032329~ (2019)[DOI]