Redesigning a faculty development program for clinical teachers in Indonesia: a before-and-after study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose Faculty development (FD) is important to support teaching, including for clinical teachers. Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) has conducted a clinical teacher training program developed by the medical education department since 2008, both for FMUI teachers and for those at other centers in Indonesia. However, participation is often challenging due to clinical, administrative, and research obligations. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic amplified the urge to transform this program. This study aimed to redesign and evaluate an FD program for clinical teachers that focuses on their needs and current situation. Methods A 5-step design thinking framework (empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing) was used with a pre/post-test design. Design thinking made it possible to develop a participant-focused program, while the pre/post-test design enabled an assessment of the program’s effectiveness. Results Seven medical educationalists and 4 senior and 4 junior clinical teachers participated in a group discussion in the empathize phase of design thinking. The research team formed a prototype of a 3-day blended learning course, with an asynchronous component using the Moodle learning management system and a synchronous component using the Zoom platform. Pre-post-testing was done in 2 rounds, with 107 and 330 participants, respectively. Evaluations of the first round provided feedback for improving the prototype for the second round. Conclusion Design thinking enabled an innovative-creative process of redesigning FD that emphasized participants’ needs. The pre/post-testing showed that the program was effective. Combining asynchronous and synchronous learning expands access and increases flexibility. This approach could also apply to other FD programs.
Abstract
Purpose Faculty development (FD) is important to support teaching, including for clinical teachers. Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) has conducted a clinical teacher training program developed by the medical education department since 2008, both for FMUI teachers and for those at other centers in Indonesia. However, participation is often challenging due to clinical, administrative, and research obligations. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic amplified the urge to transform this program. This study aimed to redesign and evaluate an FD program for clinical teachers that focuses on their needs and current situation. Methods A 5-step design thinking framework (empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing) was used with a pre/post-test design. Design thinking made it possible to develop a participant-focused program, while the pre/post-test design enabled an assessment of the program’s effectiveness. Results Seven medical educationalists and 4 senior and 4 junior clinical teachers participated in a group discussion in the empathize phase of design thinking. The research team formed a prototype of a 3-day blended learning course, with an asynchronous component using the Moodle learning management system and a synchronous component using the Zoom platform. Pre-post-testing was done in 2 rounds, with 107 and 330 participants, respectively. Evaluations of the first round provided feedback for improving the prototype for the second round. Conclusion Design thinking enabled an innovative-creative process of redesigning FD that emphasized participants’ needs. The pre/post-testing showed that the program was effective. Combining asynchronous and synchronous learning expands access and increases flexibility. This approach could also apply to other FD programs.
참고문헌 (13)
- Sutkin G, "What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? : a review of the literature", Acad Med, 83, pp.452~466 (2008)[DOI]
- Steinert Y, "Faculty development : a ‘field of dreams’", Med Educ, 43, pp.42~49 (2009)[DOI]
- McLean M, "Faculty development : yesterday, today and tomorrow", Med Teach, 30, pp.555~584 (2008)[DOI]
- Steinert Y, "A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: a 10-year update: BEME guide no. 40", Med Teach, 38, pp.769~786 (2016)[DOI]
- Henriksen D, "Design thinking : a creative approach to educational problems of practice", Think Skills Creat, 26, pp.140~153 (2017)[DOI]
- Kirkpatrick DL, "Evaluating training programs: the four levels" (2006), Berrett-Koehler
- Greviana N, "Measuring online self-regulated learning among early-career medical doctors in a Massive Open Online Course on COVID-19", Asia Pac Sch, 7, pp.76~86 (2022)[DOI]
- Naing TT, "Faculty development of medical educators : training evaluation and key challenges", Asia Pac Sch, 7, pp.23~32 (2022)[DOI]
- Maisha K, "Influencing factors of e-learning adoption amongst students in a developing country : the post-pandemic scenario in Bangladesh", Futur Bus J, 9, pp.37~ (2023)[DOI]
- Maphosa V, "Factors influencing student’s perceptions towards e-learning adoption during COVID-19 pandemic : a developing country context", Eur J Interact Multimed Educ, 2, pp.e02109~ (2021)[DOI]
- Anderson J, "Applying design thinking to curriculum reform", Acad Med, 92, pp.427~ (2017)[DOI]
- Moon H, "A practical model of faculty development in medical education: make it accessible, versatile, and easy to use!", Can Med Educ J, 15, pp.80~82 (2024)[DOI]
- Chen BY, "From modules to MOOCs : application of the six-step approach to online curriculum development for medical education", Acad Med, 94, pp.678~685 (2019)[DOI]
