본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Development and validation of multiphysics PWR core simulator KANT

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

KANT (KAIST Advanced Nuclear Tachygraphy) is a PWR core simulator recently developed at Korea Advance Institute of Science and Technology, which solves three-dimensional steady-state and transient multigroup neutron diffusion equations under Cartesian geometries alongside the incorporation of thermal-hydraulics feedback effect for multi-physics calculation. It utilizes the standard Nodal Expansion Method (NEM) accelerated with various Coarse Mesh Finite Difference (CMFD) methods for neutronics calculation. For thermal-hydraulics (TH) calculation, a single-phase flow model and a one-dimensional cylindrical fuel rod heat conduction model are employed. The time-dependent neutronics and TH calculations are numerically solved through an implicit Euler scheme, where a detailed coupling strategy is presented in this paper alongside a description of nodal equivalence, macroscopic depletion, and pin power reconstruction. For validation of the steady, transient, and depletion calculation with pin power reconstruction capacity of KANT, solutions for various benchmark problems are presented. The IAEA 3-D PWR and 4-group KOEBERG problems were considered for the steady-state reactor benchmark problem. For transient calculations, LMW (Lagenbuch, Maurer and Werner) LWR and NEACRP 3-D PWR benchmarks were solved, where the latter problem includes thermal-hydraulics feedback. For macroscopic depletion with pin power reconstruction, a small PWR problem modified with KAIST benchmark model was solved. For validation of the multi-physics analysis capability of KANT concerning large-sized PWRs, the BEAVRS Cycle1 benchmark has been considered. It was found that KANT solutions are accurate and consistent compared to other published works.

Abstract

KANT (KAIST Advanced Nuclear Tachygraphy) is a PWR core simulator recently developed at Korea Advance Institute of Science and Technology, which solves three-dimensional steady-state and transient multigroup neutron diffusion equations under Cartesian geometries alongside the incorporation of thermal-hydraulics feedback effect for multi-physics calculation. It utilizes the standard Nodal Expansion Method (NEM) accelerated with various Coarse Mesh Finite Difference (CMFD) methods for neutronics calculation. For thermal-hydraulics (TH) calculation, a single-phase flow model and a one-dimensional cylindrical fuel rod heat conduction model are employed. The time-dependent neutronics and TH calculations are numerically solved through an implicit Euler scheme, where a detailed coupling strategy is presented in this paper alongside a description of nodal equivalence, macroscopic depletion, and pin power reconstruction. For validation of the steady, transient, and depletion calculation with pin power reconstruction capacity of KANT, solutions for various benchmark problems are presented. The IAEA 3-D PWR and 4-group KOEBERG problems were considered for the steady-state reactor benchmark problem. For transient calculations, LMW (Lagenbuch, Maurer and Werner) LWR and NEACRP 3-D PWR benchmarks were solved, where the latter problem includes thermal-hydraulics feedback. For macroscopic depletion with pin power reconstruction, a small PWR problem modified with KAIST benchmark model was solved. For validation of the multi-physics analysis capability of KANT concerning large-sized PWRs, the BEAVRS Cycle1 benchmark has been considered. It was found that KANT solutions are accurate and consistent compared to other published works.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. CASMO-4E: Extended Capability CASMO-4 User’s Manual, , Studsvik Scandpower, ~, pp.SSP-09 (2009), 442-U
  2. SIMULATE-3: advanced three-dimensional two-group reactor analysis code user’s manual, , Studsvik Scandpower, ~, pp.SSP-09 (2009), 447-U
  3. PARCS NRC Core Neutronics Simulator Theory Manual, "T. Downar", ~ (2009)
  4. DeCART2D V1.1 User's Manual, "J.Y. Cho", Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, ~, pp.KAERI (2016), UM-40[DOI]
  5. Jin Young Cho, "Three Dimensional Nuclear Analysis System DeCART", CHORUS, ANS Annual Meeting, pp.2013[DOI]
  6. Piotr Darnowski, "Analysis of the BEAVRS PWR benchmark using SCALE and PARCS", NUKLEONIKA, 64(3), pp.87~96 (2019)
  7. Jaakko Leppanen, "Validation of the Serpent-ARES code sequence using the MIT BEAVRS benchmark ― HFP conditions and fuel cycle 1 simulations", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 96, pp.324~331 (2016)
  8. K. S. Smith, "Assembly homogenization techniques for light water reactor analysis", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 17(3), pp.303~335 (1986)
  9. Jaeha Kim, "Three-dimensional pin-resolved transient diffusion analysis of PWR core by the Hybrid coarse-mesh finite difference algorithm", Nuclear Science and Engineering, 194, pp.1~13 (2020)
  10. K. R. Rempe, "SIMULATE-3 pin power reconstruction : methodology and benchmarking", Nuclear Science and Engineering, 103, pp.334~ (1989)
  11. H. Finnemann, "Interface current techniques for multidimensional reactor calculations", Atomkernenergie, 30, pp.123~128 (1977)
  12. R. D. Lawrence, "Progress in nodal methods for the solution of the neutron diffusion and transport equations", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 17(3), pp.271~301 (1986)
  13. Seongdong Jang, "Improved macroscopic depletion in 2-D nodal analysis by 2x2 albedo-corrected parametrized equivalence constants method", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 175, pp.109209~ (2022)
  14. Tae-suk Oh, "Polynomial relaxation in the quasi-static approach and its implementation in nonlinear reactor transient analyses", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 158, pp.108271~ (2021)
  15. Tae-suk Oh, "Investigation of nodal numerical adjoints from CMFD-based acceleration methods", Front. Energy Res, 10, pp.873731~ (2022)
  16. COBRA-EN: an upgraded version of the COBRA-3C, "MIT code for thermal hydraulic transient analysis of light water reactor fuel assemblies and cores", D. Basile, 1999
  17. VIPRE-01: a Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis Code for Reactor Cores, "C. W. Stewart", Electric Power Research Institute, ~, pp.EPRI NP-2511 CCM (1983)
  18. J. C. Gehin, "A Quasi Static Polynomial Nodal Method for Nuclear Reactor Analysis", Ph. D., Department of Nuclear Engineering, pp.1992
  19. Bumhee Cho, "A nonoverlapping local", global iterative method with 2-D, Annals of Nuclear Energy, pp.2015, 85[DOI]
  20. Maria Pusa, "Computing the matrix exponential in burnup calculations", Nuclear Science and Engineering, 164(2), pp.140~150 (2010)
  21. Taesuk Oh, "Fission Yield Correction for Simplified Xe-135 and Sm-149 Decay Chains", Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting (2022)
  22. Hwanyeal Yu, "A new embedded analysis with pinwise discontinuity factors for pin power reconstruction", Nuclear Science and Engineering, 195(7), pp.766~777 (2021)
  23. J. Leppanen, "The Serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82, pp.142~150 (2015)
  24. Benchmark Problem Book, , Argonne National Laboratory, ~, pp.ANL-7416, Suppl. 2 (1977)
  25. E. Z. Muller, "Benchmarking with the multigroup diffusion highorder response matrix method", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 18(9), pp.535~544 (1991)
  26. Y. H. Kim, "A bilinear weighting method for the control rod cusping problem in nodal methods", Journal of Korean Nuclear Society, 22, pp.p238~ (1990)
  27. S. Langenbuch, "Coarse-mesh flux expansion method for the analysis of space-time effects in large light water reactor cores", Nuclear Science and Engineering, 63, pp.437~456 (1977)
  28. Benchmark Problems in Reactor and Particle Transport Physics:Benchmark Problem 1A ~ 3A, "N.Z. Cho", ~ (2000)
  29. D.N. Horelik, "Benchmark for evaluation and validation of reactor simulations", MIT Computational Reactor Physics Group, 29 (2018)
  30. J. Kotchoubey, "POLCA-T Neutron Kinetics Model Benchmarking", Master, Division of Nuclear Reactor Technology, pp.2015
  31. K. S. Smith, "An Analytic Nodal Method for Solving the Two-Group, Multidimensional Static and Transient Neutron Diffusion Equations", Master, Department of Nuclear Engineering, pp.1979
  32. M. P. Knight, "Derivation of a refined PANTHER solution to the NEACRP PWR rod ejection transients", Proc. Joint Int. Conf. Mathematical Methods and Supercomputing for Nuclear Applications, 1, pp.302~313 (1997), American Nuclear Society
  33. "Results of LWR core transient benchmarks" (1993)[URL]
  34. C. Wan, "Uncertainty analysis for the assembly and core simulation of BEAVRS at HZP conditions", Nuclear Engineering and Design, 314, pp.11~19 (2017)
  35. Min Ryu, "Solution of the BEAVRS benchmark using the nTRACER direct whole core calculation code", Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 52(7-8), pp.961~969 (2015)
  36. Kan Wang, "Analysis of BEAVRS two-cycle benchmark using RMC based on full core detailed model", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 98, pp.301~312 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)