본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A new surrogate method for the neutron kinetics calculation of nuclear reactor core transients

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

Reactor core transient calculation is very important for the reactor safety analysis, in which the kernel is neutron kinetics calculation by simulating the variation of neutron density or thermal power over time. Compared with the point kinetics method, the time-space neutron kinetics calculation can provide accurate variation of neutron density in both space and time domain. But it consumes a lot of resources. It is necessary to develop a surrogate model that can quickly obtain the temporal and spatial variation information of neutron density or power with acceptable calculation accuracy. This paper uses the time-varying characteristics of power to construct a time function, parameterizes the time-varying characteristics which contains the information about the spatial change of power. Thereby, the amount of targets to predict in the space domain is compressed. A surrogate method using the machine learning is proposed in this paper. In the construction of a neural network, the input is processed by a convolutional layer, followed by a fully connected layer or a deconvolution layer. For the problem of time sequence disturbance, a structure combining convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network is used. It is verified in the tests of a series of 1D, 2D and 3D reactor models. The predicted values obtained using the constructed neural network models in these tests are in good agreement with the reference values, showing the powerful potential of the surrogate models.

Abstract

Reactor core transient calculation is very important for the reactor safety analysis, in which the kernel is neutron kinetics calculation by simulating the variation of neutron density or thermal power over time. Compared with the point kinetics method, the time-space neutron kinetics calculation can provide accurate variation of neutron density in both space and time domain. But it consumes a lot of resources. It is necessary to develop a surrogate model that can quickly obtain the temporal and spatial variation information of neutron density or power with acceptable calculation accuracy. This paper uses the time-varying characteristics of power to construct a time function, parameterizes the time-varying characteristics which contains the information about the spatial change of power. Thereby, the amount of targets to predict in the space domain is compressed. A surrogate method using the machine learning is proposed in this paper. In the construction of a neural network, the input is processed by a convolutional layer, followed by a fully connected layer or a deconvolution layer. For the problem of time sequence disturbance, a structure combining convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network is used. It is verified in the tests of a series of 1D, 2D and 3D reactor models. The predicted values obtained using the constructed neural network models in these tests are in good agreement with the reference values, showing the powerful potential of the surrogate models.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. D. E. Rumelhart, "Learning representations by backpropagating errors", Nature, 323, pp.533~536 (1986)[DOI]
  2. J. R. Quinlan, "Induction of decision trees", Mach. Learn, 1, pp.81~106 (1986)[DOI]
  3. M. Krzywinski, "Classification and regression trees", Nat. Methods, pp.757~758 (2017)
  4. S. L. Salzberg, "C4.5: programs for machine learning", pp.235~240 (1994), Morgan Kaufmann publishers, Inc
  5. Y. LeCun, "Backpropagation applied to handwritten Zip code recognition", Neural Comput, 1, pp.541~551 (1989)[DOI]
  6. K. S. Narendra, "Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks", IEEE Trans. Neural Network, 1, pp.4~27 (1990)
  7. M. Raissi, "Physics-informed neural networks : a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations", J. Comput. Phys, 378, pp.686~707 (2019)[DOI]
  8. E. Haghighat, "A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics", Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng, 379, pp.113741~ (2021)[DOI]
  9. "Physics-guided Neural Networks (PGNN): an Application in Lake Temperature Modeling" (2021)[URL]
  10. I. Alguindigue, "Vibration Monitoring with Artificial Neural Networks", ~ (1991)
  11. E. B. Bartlett, "Nuclear power plant status diagnostics using an artificial neural network", Nucl. Technol, 97, pp.272~281 (1991)
  12. Y. Bartal, "Nuclear power plant transient diagnostics using artificial neural networks that allow"don’t-know"classifications", Nucl. Technol, 110, pp.436~449 (1995)[DOI]
  13. E. Nissan, "An overview of AI methods for in-core fuel management: tools for the automatic design of nuclear reactor core configurations for fuel reload, (Re)arranging new and partly spent fuel", Design, 3, pp.37~ (2019)[DOI]
  14. G. T. Parks, "An intelligent stochastic optimization routine for nuclear fuel cycle design", Nucl. Technol, 89, pp.233~246 (1990)[DOI]
  15. J. Yang, "An accident diagnosis algorithm using long short-term memory", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 50, pp.582~588 (2018)[DOI]
  16. Y. Liu, "Data-driven modeling of coarse mesh turbulence for reactor transient analysis using convolutional recurrent neural networks", Nucl. Eng. Des, 390, pp.111716~ (2022)[DOI]
  17. M. I. Radaideh, "Neural-based time series forecasting of loss of coolant accidents in nuclear power plants", Expert Syst. Appl, 160, pp.113699~ (2020)[DOI]
  18. G. Lee, "A convolutional neural network model for abnormality diagnosis in a nuclear power plant", Appl. Soft Comput, 99, pp.106874~ (2021)[DOI]
  19. J. L. Montes, "LPPF PREDICTION IN A BWR FUEL LATTICE USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS", ~ (2007)
  20. Z. Li, "An accident diagnosis algorithm for HTR-PM based on deep learning methods", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 115, pp.140~150 (2019)[DOI]
  21. M. H. Elhareef, "PHYSICS-INFORMED DEEP LEARNING NEURAL NETWORK SOLUTION TO THE NEUTRON DIFFUSION MODEL", 12~ (2021)
  22. J. Wang, "Surrogate modeling for neutron diffusion problems based on conservative physics-informed neural networks with boundary conditions enforcement", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 176, pp.109234~ (2022)[DOI]
  23. M. Boroushaki, "Simulation of nuclear reactor core kinetics using multilayer 3-D cellular neural networks", IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci, 52, pp.719~728 (2005)[DOI]
  24. H. Kim, "Feasibility study of an explainable AI-based anomaly detection for nuclear reactor core operation in PWRs", ~ (2023)
  25. J. Zhang, "Fast prediction of multi-physics coupling for heat pipe reactors based on neural networks", ~ (2023)
  26. A. Zhang, "Prediction of nuclear reactor core thermal power based on artificial neural network", Comput. Simulat, 38, pp.455~461 (2021)
  27. Z. Cai, "Nuclear Power Reactor Neutron Dynamics" (2005), National Defense Industry Press
  28. Z. Huang, "Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Dynamics" (2014), Peking University Press
  29. Q. Huang, "A review of the application of artificial intelligence to nuclear reactors: where we are and what’s next", Heliyon, 9, pp.e13883~ (2023)[DOI]
  30. A. Karpatne, "Theory-guided data science : a new Paradigm for scientific discovery from data", IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng, 29, pp.2318~2331 (2017)[DOI]
  31. X. Jia, "Verification of SARAX code system in the reactor core transient calculation based on the simplified EBR-II benchmark", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 54, pp.1813~1824 (2022)[DOI]
  32. NATIONAL ENERGY SOFTWARE CENTER, "BENCHMARK PROBLEM BOOK", Argonne National Laboratory
  33. "POLCA-T neutron kinetics Model. Benchmarking" (2015)[URL]
  34. PWR Benchmark on Uncontrolled Rods Withdrawal at Zero Power, "R. Fraikin", OECD, 1997, NEA[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (49건)