Analysis and comparison of the 2D/1D and quasi-3D methods with the direct transport code SHARK
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 2D/1D method has become the mainstream of the direct transport calculation considering the balance of accuracy and efficiency. However, the 2D/1D method still suffers from stability issues. Recently, a quasi-3D method has been proposed with axial Legendre expansion. Analysis and comparison of the 2D/1D and quasi-3D method is conducted in theory from the equation derivation. Besides, the C5G7 benchmark, the KUCA benchmark and the macro BEAVRS benchmark are calculated to verify the theory comparisons of these two methods with the direct transport code SHARK. All results show that the quasi-3D method has better stability and accuracy than the 2D/1D method with worse efficiency and memory cost. It provides a new option for direct transport calculation with the quasi-3D method.
Abstract
The 2D/1D method has become the mainstream of the direct transport calculation considering the balance of accuracy and efficiency. However, the 2D/1D method still suffers from stability issues. Recently, a quasi-3D method has been proposed with axial Legendre expansion. Analysis and comparison of the 2D/1D and quasi-3D method is conducted in theory from the equation derivation. Besides, the C5G7 benchmark, the KUCA benchmark and the macro BEAVRS benchmark are calculated to verify the theory comparisons of these two methods with the direct transport code SHARK. All results show that the quasi-3D method has better stability and accuracy than the 2D/1D method with worse efficiency and memory cost. It provides a new option for direct transport calculation with the quasi-3D method.
참고문헌 (16)
- W. Wu, "Verification of the 3D capability of OpenMOC with the C5G7 3D extension benchmark", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 140, pp.107293~ (2020)
- H.G. Joo, "Methods and performance of a three-dimensional whole-core transport code DeCART", Proc. Of PHYSOR (2004)
- B. Kochunas, "Overview of Development and Design of MPACT: Michigan Parallel Characteristics Transport Code”M&C 2013", ~ (2013)
- Y. S. Jung, "Practical numerical reactor employing direct whole core neutron transport and subchannel thermal", hydraulic solvers, 2013, pp.62, 357~374
- J. Chen, "A new high-fidelity neutronics code NECP-X", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 116, pp.417~428 (2018)
- Y. Zheng, "A new approach to three-dimensional neutron transport solution based on the method of characteristics and linear axial approximation", J. Comput. Phys, 350, pp.25~44 (2017)
- S. Choi, "Recent development status of neutron transport code STREAM", Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting (2019)
- A. Marin-Lafleche, "Proteus-Moc, A 3D Deterministic Solver Incorporating 2D Method of Characteristics", M&C (2013)
- C. Zhao, "A linear source scheme for the 2D", 1D transport method in SHARK, 2021, pp.161, 108479~
- S. Stimpson, "Assessment and improvement of the 2D", 1D method stability in DeCART, 2013, ~
- Oecd, "Calculations without spatial homogenization", MOX Fuel Assembly 3-D Extension Case”, Nuclear Science, NEA, DOC, pp.2005, 16~
- C. Zhao, "Research for the Improvement of the 2D", 1D Transport Method and Application in the Numerical Nuclear Reactor Physics calculation, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2019
- M. Jarrett, "An Improved 2D", 1D P3 Method with Angle-dependent Leakage and Pin Homogenization, 2018, ~
- A. Yamamoto, "Derivation of optimum polar angle quadrature set for the method of characteristics based on approximation error for the bickley function", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol, 44, pp.129~136 (2007)
- N. Horelik, "Benchmark for evaluation and validation of reactor simulations (BEAVRS)", International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (2013)
- K. Wang, "RMC e a Monte Carlo code for reactor core analysis", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, pp.121~129 (2015)