본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Variation of reliability-based seismic analysis of an electrical cabinet in different NPP location for Korean Peninsula

김두기|Tahmina Tasnim Nahar|Md Motiur Rahman
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)|2022.03|Nuclear Engineering and Technology|제54권 제3호|pp. 926-939|DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.09.026

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)Classical reliability analysisFirst-order second moment method (FOSM)PSHAReliability index of the cabinetEarthquake level
주제분류원자력공학

초록

The area of this study will cover the location-wise seismic response variation of an electrical cabinet innuclear power point (NPP) based on classical reliability analysis. The location-based seismic groundmotion (GM) selection is carried out with the help of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis using PSHRisktool,where the variation of reliability analysis can be understood from the relation between the reliabilityindex and intensity measure. Two different approaches such as the first-order second momentmethod (FOSM) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) are helped to evaluate and compare the reliabilityassessment of the cabinet. The cabinet is modeled with material uncertainty utilizing Steel01 as thematerial model and the fiber section modeling approach is considered to characterize the section'snonlinear reaction behavior. To verify the modal frequency, this study compares the FEM result withrecorded data using Least-Squares Complex Exponential (LSCE) method from the impact hammer test. Inspite of a few investigations, the main novelty of this study is to introduce the reader to check andcompare the seismic reliability assessment variation in different seismic locations and for differentearthquake levels. Alongside, the betterment can be found by comparing the result between twoconsidered reliability estimation methods.

Abstract

The area of this study will cover the location-wise seismic response variation of an electrical cabinet innuclear power point (NPP) based on classical reliability analysis. The location-based seismic groundmotion (GM) selection is carried out with the help of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis using PSHRisktool,where the variation of reliability analysis can be understood from the relation between the reliabilityindex and intensity measure. Two different approaches such as the first-order second momentmethod (FOSM) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) are helped to evaluate and compare the reliabilityassessment of the cabinet. The cabinet is modeled with material uncertainty utilizing Steel01 as thematerial model and the fiber section modeling approach is considered to characterize the section'snonlinear reaction behavior. To verify the modal frequency, this study compares the FEM result withrecorded data using Least-Squares Complex Exponential (LSCE) method from the impact hammer test. Inspite of a few investigations, the main novelty of this study is to introduce the reader to check andcompare the seismic reliability assessment variation in different seismic locations and for differentearthquake levels. Alongside, the betterment can be found by comparing the result between twoconsidered reliability estimation methods.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. H. Gulvanessian, "EN1990 Eurocode-basis of structural design", P. I. Eng. Civ. En, 144, pp.8~13 (2001)[DOI]
  2. P. Varpasuo, "The seismic reliability of VVER-1000 NPP prestressed containment building", Nucl. Eng. Des, 160, pp.387~398 (1996)[DOI]
  3. K. Salman, "Seismic capacity evaluation of NPP electrical cabinet facility considering grouping effects", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol, 57, pp.1~13 (2020)[DOI]
  4. Thanh-Tuan Tran, "Fragility Assessment for Electric Cabinet in Nuclear Power Plant Using Response Surface Methodology", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(3), pp.894~903 (2019), 한국원자력학회[DOI]
  5. J. Hur, "Seismic reliability analysis of NPP's nonstructural components using surrogate models", 13th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (2019)
  6. PRA Procedures Guide: A Guide to the Performance of Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear Power Plants, "J.W. Hickman", US Nuclear Regulatory Comission, ~, pp.NUREG (1983), CR-2300
  7. A. T. Cao, "Simplified approach for seismic risk assessment of cabinet facility in nuclear power plants based on cumulative absolute velocity", Nucl. Technol, 206, pp.743~757 (2019)[DOI]
  8. S. Poghosyan, "Complex investigation of fire PSA dominant scenario related to direct flame contact with safety related pipes", PSAM 12 - the Probabilistic Safety Assessment &Management Conference (2014)
  9. T. Sakurahara, "Methodological and practical comparison of integrated probabilistic risk assessment(I-PRA)with the existing fire PRA of nuclear power plants", Nucl. Technol, 204, pp.354~377 (2018)[DOI]
  10. M. A. Hariri-Ardebili, "Safety and reliability assessment of heterogeneous concrete components in nuclear structures", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 203, pp.107104~ (2020)[DOI]
  11. S. Jin, "Damage performance based seismic capacity and fragility analysis of existing concrete containment structure subjected to near fault ground motions", Nucl. Eng. Des, 360, pp.110478~ (2020)[DOI]
  12. W. Jiang, "Generate floor response spectra : Part 1. Direct spectra-to-spectra method", Nucl. Eng. Des, 293, pp.525~546 (2015)[DOI]
  13. L. E. Suarez, "Floor response spectra with structureeequipment interaction effects by a mode synthesis approach", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam, 15, pp.141~158 (1987)[DOI]
  14. A. R. T. Kanee, "Elastic floor response spectra of nonlinear frame structures subjected to forward-directivity pulses of nearfault records", Earthq. Struct, 5, pp.49~65 (2013)[DOI]
  15. T. T. Nahar, "PSHRisk-Tool : a python-based computational tool for developing site seismic hazard analysis and failure risk assessment of infrastructure", Appl. Sci, 10, pp.1~26 (2020)[DOI]
  16. Y. C. Sung, "Performance-based damage assessment of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings", J. Chin. Inst. Eng, 29, pp.51~62 (2006)[DOI]
  17. M. Liu, "Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam, 34, pp.289~306 (2005)[DOI]
  18. V. E. Saouma, "Seismic capacity and fragility analysis of an ASR-affected nuclear containment vessel structure", Nucl. Eng. Des, 346, pp.140~156 (2019)[DOI]
  19. Seismic Fragility of Nuclear Power Plant Components (Phase II), "K.K. Bandyopadhyay", US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ~, pp.NUREG (1987), CR-4659
  20. Notes in Structural Reliability Theory and Risk Analysis, "J. D. Sørensen", Institute of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, ~ (2004)
  21. R. E. Melchers, "Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction" (2018), John wiley & sons
  22. R. Mohammadi, "Structural reliability index versus behavior factor in RC frames with equal lateral resistance", Eartheq. Struct, 8, pp.996~1016 (2015)[DOI]
  23. T. K. Datta, "Seismic Analysis of Structures" (2010), John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd
  24. T. T. Nahar, "Effective safety assessment of aged concrete gravity dam based on the reliability index in a seismically induced site", Appl. Sci, 11 (2021)
  25. A. H. -S. Ang, "Structural risk analysis and reliability-based design", J. Struct. Div, 99, pp.1891~1910 (1973)[DOI]
  26. O. Ditlevsen, "Structural Reliability Methods" (1996), John Wiley & Sons
  27. P. Thoft-Cristensen, "Structural Reliability Theory and its Applications" (1982), Springer Science & Business Media
  28. M. Tichý, "Applied Methods of Structural Reliability" (1993), Springer Science & Business Media
  29. M. A. Hariri-Ardebili, "Simplified reliability analysis of multi hazard risk in gravity dams via machine learning techniques", Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng, 18, pp.592~610 (2018)[DOI]
  30. A. Haldar, "Probabilistic Structural Mechanics Handbook: Theory and Industrial Applications", pp.27~52 (1995), Springer US
  31. A. Harbitz, "An efficient sampling method for probability of failure calculation", Struct. Saf, 3, pp.109~115 (1986)[DOI]
  32. M. D. McKay, "A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code", Technometrics, 42, pp.55~61 (2000)[DOI]
  33. S. -K. Au, "Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation", Probabilist. Eng. Mech, 16, pp.263~277 (2001)[DOI]
  34. C. A. Cornell, "A probability-based structural code", J. Am. Concr. Inst, 66, pp.974~985 (1969)[DOI]
  35. E. Rosenblueth, "Reliability basis for some Mexican codes", ACI Spec. Publ, 31, pp.1~41 (1972)[DOI]
  36. R. L. Iman, "A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables", Commun. Stat. Simulat. Comput, 11, pp.311~334 (1982)[DOI]
  37. A. M. Olsson, "Latin hypercube sampling for stochastic finite element analysis", J. Eng. Mech, 128, pp.121~125 (2002)[DOI]
  38. M. Stein, "Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling", Technometrics, 29, pp.143~151 (1987)[DOI]
  39. D. Huntington, "Improvements to and limitations of Latin hypercube sampling", Probabilist. Eng. Mech, 13, pp.245~253 (1998)[DOI]
  40. B.M. Ayyub, "Structural reliability assessment using Latin hypercube sampling", 5th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (1989)
  41. F. McKenna, "OpenSees : open system for earthquake engineering simulation", Comput. Sci. Eng, 13, pp.58~66 (2006)[DOI]
  42. M. M. Rahman, "FeView : finite element model(FEM)visualization and post-processing tool for OpenSees", Software, 15, pp.100751~ (2021)[DOI]
  43. A. Neuenhofer, "Geometrically nonlinear flexibility-based frame finite element", J. Struct. Eng, 124, pp.704~711 (1998)[DOI]
  44. S. Mazzoni, "The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES): OpenSees Command Language Manual", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER), ~ (2006)
  45. Máté Hazay, "11.19: Seismic fragility assessment of steel frames: Application of advanced reliability analysis", ce, 2017, pp.1(2-3), 2993~3002[DOI]
  46. N. K. Psyrras, "Build-X : expert system for seismic analysis and assessment of 3D buildings using OpenSees", Adv. Eng. Software, 116, pp.23~35 (2018)[DOI]
  47. X. Lu, "A shear wall element for nonlinear seismic analysis of super-tall buildings using OpenSees", Finite Elem. Anal. Des, 98, pp.14~25 (2015)[DOI]
  48. B. H. Kim, "A new method to extract modal parameters using output-only responses", J. Sound Vib, 282, pp.215~230 (2005)[DOI]
  49. R. Brincker, "Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition", Smart Mater. Struct, 10, pp.441~445 (2001)[DOI]
  50. J. Cara, "Modal identification of structures from input", output data using the expectationemaximization algorithm and uncertainty quantification by mean of the bootstrap, 2019, pp.26, 2272~
  51. B. -H. Park, "Vector ARMAX modeling approach in multi-input modal analysis", Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 3, pp.373~387 (1989)[DOI]
  52. Parameter estimation techniques for modal analysis, "D.L. Brown", SAE, 828~846, pp.SAE Technical Papers 88 (1979)
  53. "Digital Signal Processing" (2016)[URL]
  54. A. Mohammed, "Investigation of the Table in the Student Lab", Master, Department of Mechanical Engineering, pp.2005
  55. C. Shah, "Mesh discretization error and criteria for accuracy of finite element solutions", 4th ASEAN ANSYS User Conference (2002)
  56. S. Pakzad, "Dynamics of Civil Structures: Proceedings of the 36th IMAC", Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics (2018), Springer
  57. M. Mashayekhi, "Development of hysteretic energy compatible endurance time excitations and its application", Eng. Struct, 177, pp.753~769 (2018)[DOI]
  58. J. K. Lapajne, "Seismic hazard reassessment of an existing NPP in Slovenia", Nucl. Eng. Des, 175, pp.215~226 (1997)[DOI]
  59. N. Jayaram, "A computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance", Earthq. Spectra, 27, pp.797~815 (2011)[DOI]
  60. "Push for Reactors Halt Causes Stir" (2017)[URL]
  61. Korea-Japan Joint Research on Development of Seismic Capacity Evaluation and Enhancement Technology Considering Near-Fault Effects, "Y.S. Choun", Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, ~, pp.KAERI (2003), RR-2688[DOI]
  62. C. A. Cornell, "Seismic motion and response prediction alternatives", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam, 7, pp.295~315 (1979)[DOI]
  63. Regulatory Guide 1.60: Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, "U. S. NRC", United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 301~415 (2014)
  64. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, "ASCE", American Society of Civil Engineers, ~, pp.ASCE (2017), SEI 41-17
  65. Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, "FEMA", Federal Emergency Management Agency, ~, pp.FEMA P-58-1 (2018)
  66. M. Mahsuli, "Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis", J. Comput. Civ. Eng, 27, pp.87~98 (2013)[DOI]
  67. M. Westberg, "Reliability-Based Assessment of Concrete Dam Stability", Doctor, pp.2010
  68. Introduction to Safety and Reliability of Structures, "J. Schneider", International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, ~ (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

Seismic capacity re-evaluation of the 480V motor control center of South Korea NPPs using earthquake experience and experiment data김민규, 최유정, 최인길한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제4호Seismic evaluation of different types of electrical cabinets in nuclear power plants considering coupling effects: Experimental and numerical study김두기, 김석철, Ikbal Md Kamrul Hasan, Nguyen Dong Van한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제9호Hazard-consistent fragility analysis of equipment in NPP structures considering multiple hazard levels정형조, 주희건한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2025 · 제57권 제12호An efficient numerical modeling approach for coupled electrical cabinets in nuclear power plants김두기, Islam Md. Rajibul, Turja Sudeep Das, Van Nguyen Dong한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2024 · 제56권 제9호Impact of choice of fragility approaches on seismic risk quantification of nuclear power plantsAldemir Tunc, Denning Richard, Kasapoglu Baris, Sezen Halil한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2024 · 제56권 제12호Effect of nonlinear structural response on seismic fragility and risk of emergency power supply and distribution system in a nuclear power plantLi Chengzhen, Tang Yuchuan, Tombaş Emrullah한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2025 · 제57권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)

Neutronics modelling of control rod compensation operation in small modular fast reactor using OpenMCXin Jin, Hui Guo, Xingjie Peng, Yiwei Wu, Kuaiyuan Feng, Hanyang Gupp. 803-810Application of artificial neural network for the critical flow prediction of discharge nozzleTao Tang, Yuechan Liu, Baorui Zhang, Hong Xupp. 834-841Thermo-mechanical stress analysis of feed-water valves in nuclear power plantsLei Zhao, Yang Yue, Wen-qing Li, Jia-yi Wu, Zhi-jiang Jin, Jin-yuan Qianpp. 849-859Modified θ projection model-based constant-stress creep curve for alloy 690 steam generator tube material최권재, 한상배, 김종민, 문성인, 권준엽, 이봉상, 김민철pp. 917-925Henry gas solubility optimization for control of a nuclear reactor: A case studySeyed Mohammad Hossein Mousakazemipp. 940-947
원문 보기