본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A multi-criteria decision-making process for selecting decontamination methods for radioactively contaminated metal components

김대현|류호진|최성열|함인혜
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)|2023.01|Nuclear Engineering and Technology|제55권 제1호|pp. 52-62|DOI 10.1016/j.net.2022.09.012

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

AHPTOPSISPROMETHEEDecommissioningSteam generator
주제분류원자력공학

초록

Various decontamination technologies have been developed for removing contaminated areas in industries. Although it is important to consider parameters such as safety, cost, and time when selecting the decontamination technology, till date their comparative study is missing. Furthermore, different decontamination technologies influence the decontamination effects in different ways. Therefore, this study compares different decontamination techniques for the steam generator using a multicriteria decision-making method. A steam generator is a large device comprising both low- and very low-level waste (LLW, VLLW) and reflects the difference in weights of the standards according to the classification of the waste. For LLW and VLLW decontaminations, chemical oxidizing reduction decontamination (CORD) and decontamination grit blasting were used as the preferred techniques, respectively, considering the purpose of decontamination differs based on the initial state of waste. An expert survey revealed that safety in LLW and waste minimization in VLLW exhibited high preference. This evaluation method can be applied not only to the comparison between each process, but also to the creation of process scenarios. Therefore, determining the decontamination approach using logical decision-making methods may improve the safety and economic feasibility of each step in the decommissioning process and ensure a public acceptance.

Abstract

Various decontamination technologies have been developed for removing contaminated areas in industries. Although it is important to consider parameters such as safety, cost, and time when selecting the decontamination technology, till date their comparative study is missing. Furthermore, different decontamination technologies influence the decontamination effects in different ways. Therefore, this study compares different decontamination techniques for the steam generator using a multicriteria decision-making method. A steam generator is a large device comprising both low- and very low-level waste (LLW, VLLW) and reflects the difference in weights of the standards according to the classification of the waste. For LLW and VLLW decontaminations, chemical oxidizing reduction decontamination (CORD) and decontamination grit blasting were used as the preferred techniques, respectively, considering the purpose of decontamination differs based on the initial state of waste. An expert survey revealed that safety in LLW and waste minimization in VLLW exhibited high preference. This evaluation method can be applied not only to the comparison between each process, but also to the creation of process scenarios. Therefore, determining the decontamination approach using logical decision-making methods may improve the safety and economic feasibility of each step in the decommissioning process and ensure a public acceptance.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. G. Barariu, "The optimization of decontamination methods selected for contaminated areas used in decommissioning of CANDUn6 NPP", J. Energy Power Eng, 4 (2010)
  2. Ömer Kaya, "A novel two stage approach for electric taxis charging station site selection", Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, pp.102396~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Ch Achillas, "Electronic waste management cost: a scenario-based analysis for Greece", Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 29(9), pp.963~972 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  4. M. Bertolini, "Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract", International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), pp.422~430 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. Kadir D. Alemdar, "A GIS and microsimulation-based MCDA approach for evaluation of pedestrian crossings", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 148, pp.105771~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. Yi-Jing Zhang, "Mathematical modeling and evaluation of the safety culture for the operating nuclear power plants in China: Critical review and multi-criteria decision analysis", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 168, pp.108871~ (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. İsmail Erol, "Fuzzy MCDM framework for locating a nuclear power plant in Turkey", Energy Policy, 67, pp.186~197 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  8. Ruxing Gao, "National Options for a Sustainable Nuclear Energy System: MCDM Evaluation Using an Improved Integrated Weighting Approach", Energies, 10(12), pp.2017~ (2017), MDPI AG[DOI]
  9. Decision Analysis System for Selection of Appropriate Decontamination Technologies, "M.A. Ebadian", Federal Energy Technology Center Morgantown (FETC-MGN), ~ (1998)
  10. G. Dottavio, "Logistical optimization of nuclear waste flows during decommissioning", 8th Int. Conf. Energy Manag, 10, pp.968~973 (2016)
  11. 송종순, "원전 해체 시 최적 제염기술 선정을 위한 EXPERT-CHOICE 기법 적용에 대한 연구", Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, 15(3), pp.231~237 (2017), 한국방사성폐기물학회[DOI]
  12. KwanSeong Jeong, "Approach to optimization of risk assessment based on an evaluation matrix for decommissioning processes of a nuclear facility", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 128, pp.53~62 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  13. 배선하, "AHP와 TOPSIS 융합 방법론을 이용한 국가 사이버 역량 강화 방안", 융합보안 논문지, 15(4), pp.43~55 (2015), 한국융합보안학회
  14. Thomas L Saaty, "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp.234~281 (1977), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  15. C.-L. Hwang, "Mult. Attrib. Decis. Mak. Methods Appl. A State-Of-The-Art Surv", pp.58~191 (1981), Springer Berlin Heidelberg
  16. J.-P. Brans, "Mult. Criteria Decis. Anal. State Art Surv", pp.187~219 (2016), Springer
  17. Adel Guitouni, "Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method", European Journal of Operational Research, 109(2), pp.501~521 (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  18. J.P. Brans, "A preference ranking organisation method: (the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making)", Manage. Sci, 31, pp.647~656 (1985)
  19. 송종순, "원전 제염기술 및 해외경험 분석을 통한 1차 계통 제염 적용 연구", Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, 14(1), pp.45~55 (2016), 한국방사성폐기물학회[DOI]
  20. M. Walberg, "Disposal of steam generators from decommissioning of PWR nuclear power plants", IYNC, (158) (2008)
  21. H.D. Mathieu Ponnet, "Thorough Chemical Decontamination with the MEDOC Process: Batch Treatment of Dismantled Pieces or Loop Treatment of Large Components Such as the BR3Steam Generator and Pressurizer", Thorough Chemical Decontamination with the MEDOC Process: Batch Treatment, pp.1~9 (2003)
  22. NEW TREATMENT CONCEPT FOR STEAM GENERATORS- TECHNICAL ASPECTS, "A. Lindstrom", Waset Manag., ~ (2007)
  23. C. Topf, "Full system decontamination (FSD) with the CORD ® family prior to decommissioning-experiences at the German NPP obrigheim 2007", Iync, pp.20~26 (2008)
  24. L. S. Belda, "Decontamination in preparation for dismantlement - AREVA's chemical decontamination technologies, projects performed and results obtained in the period 2011-2016", Curr. Emerg. Methods Optimising Saf. Effic. Nucl. Decommissioning (2017)
  25. "Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: Decontamination, Disassembly and Waste Management" (1983)[URL]
  26. B. Krause, "Options for Steam Generator Decommissioning", 10, pp.103~106 (2016)
  27. 김계남, "ABRASIVE BLASTING TECHNOLOGY FOR DECONTAMINATION OF THE INNER SURFACE OF STEAM GENERATOR TUBES", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 43(5), pp.469~476 (2011), 한국원자력학회
  28. Decontamination and Dismantling of Radioactive Concrete Structures A Report of the NEA Co-operative Programme on Decommissioning (CPD) Decontamination and Dismantling of Radioactive Concrete Structures, "OECD", ~ (2011)
  29. M. Ponnet, "Metal decontamination techniques used in decommissioning activities" (2002), in : Eur. Nucl. Decommissioning Train
  30. "ANTIOXI-decontamination Techniques for Activity Removal in Nuclear Environments" (2008)[URL]
  31. Analysis on the Current Status of Chemical Decontamination Technology of Steam Generators in the Oversea Nuclear Power Plants, "T. Yoon", NPPs, 29~31 (2015)
  32. Decontamination of Reactor Systems and Contaminated Components for Disposal or Refurbishment Developments and Experience with the EPRI DFD Chemical Decontaminati O N Process, "EPRI", ~ (2001)
  33. Review of Plant Decontamination Methods, "EPRI", ~ (1989)
  34. Egidijus Babilas, "Selection and evaluation of decontamination and dismantling techniques for decommissioning of large NPPs components", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 84, pp.108~115 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  35. Selection of Decommissioning Strategies: Issues and Factors, "IAEA", Expert Group, ~, pp.IAEA-TECDOC-1478 (2005)
  36. Technology Reference Guide for Radiologically Contaminated Surfaces, "EPA", ~ (2006)
  37. "Identifying and Evaluating Hazards in Research Laboratories" (2015)[URL]
  38. Study on the State-Of-The Arts Approaches and Methodologies for the Decommissioning Cost Estimation of Nuclear Facilities, "KAERI", ~ (2004)
  39. Y.S. Hwang, "Progress of radioactive waste management in Korea", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 42(2), pp.159~177 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  40. MOTIE, "RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT", ~ (2017)
  41. A. Lindstrom, "New treatment concept for steam generators technical aspects", Waste Manag. Symp. Conf. Sess., pp.3~24 (2007)
  42. M.G. Carmichael, "The ANBOT: an intelligent robotic Co-worker for industrial abrasive blasting", 2019 IEEE, 2019, 8026~8033
  43. "Radiological Assessment of Steam Generator Removal and Replacement : Update and Revision National Technical Informati on Service" (1980)[URL]
  44. 문제권, "The Status and Prospect of Decommissioning Technology Development at KAERI", Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, 17(2), pp.139~165 (2019), 한국방사성폐기물학회[DOI]
  45. L. AITAMMAR, "Chooz-A steam generators characterization", PREDEC 2016 Chooz-A Steam Gener. Charact (2016)
  46. THE DECOMMISSIONING OF THE BR3 STEAM GENERATOR, "SCKCEN", ~ (2005)
  47. Ponnet, Comparison of Thorough Decontamination Techniques on Dismantled Pieces of a PWR Reactor, "M. Klein", IAEA, ~ (1998)
  48. Decontamination Techniques Used in Decommissioning Activities, "OECD", ~ (1999)
  49. Shengyong Liu, "A State-of-the-Art Review of Radioactive Decontamination Technologies: Facing the Upcoming Wave of Decommissioning and Dismantling of Nuclear Facilities", Sustainability, 14(7), pp.4021~ (2022), MDPI AG[DOI]
  50. 손영직, "고리1호기 증기발생기 제염해체 시 작업자 피폭선량 평가 및 저감화 방안", Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, 16(3), pp.377~387 (2018), 한국방사성폐기물학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

해체공정에서의 방사화부식생성물 제거를 위한 제염기술 선정 인자에 관한 연구송종순, 유현진, 이상헌, 현도원(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2024 · 제18권 제4호Laser decontamination for radioactive contaminated metal surface: A reviewCai Chuang, Chen Hui, Ji Fei, Liao Dasong, Wang Feisen, Wang Qian, Yong Chen한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제1호A Study on the Construction of Cutting Scenario for Kori Unit 1 Bio-shield considering ALARA송종순, 안준열, 양기태, 이민호, 이학윤한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제11호Surface removal of stainless steel using a single-mode continuous wave fiber laser to decontaminate primary circuits송기희, 신재성한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제9호Simulation analysis and evaluation of decontamination effect of different abrasive jet process parameters on radioactively contaminated metalChen Bo, Deng Jian, Huang Can-yu, Hua Yun-fei, Lei Jie-heng, Lei Lin, Lei Ze-yong, Zhao Mu, Zhong Lin, Zuo Zhe-wen한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제11호Method for clearance of contaminated buildings in Korea research reactor 1 and 2강민영, 김광표, 김근호, 송정호, 이준희, 임준혁, 황두성한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)

The regulatory system for imported-cargo radiation monitoring in Korea and a proposal for its improvement김화평, 송창주, 김희근, 손진호, 김성준, 이은지, 정철기, 최우석, 공태영pp. 1-11Laser decontamination for radioactive contaminated metal surface: A reviewLiao Dasong, Wang Feisen, Cai Chuang, Chen Hui, Ji Fei, Yong Chen, Wang Qianpp. 12-24Modeling cryptographic algorithms validation and developing block ciphers with electronic code book for a control system at nuclear power plants함인혜, 손준영, 탁태우pp. 25-36Measurement of missing video frames in NPP control room monitoring system using Kalman filterGupta Manjari, Chaubey Mrityunjay, Singh Lalit Kumarpp. 37-44Analysis of dismantling process and disposal cost of waste RVCH김윤규, 서태원, 박선규pp. 45-51
원문 보기