Loading pattern design and economic evaluation for 24-month cycle operation of OPR-1000 in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to the tightened regulatory environment since the Fukushima accident, the capacity factor of Korean nuclear power plants has been declining since 2011. To overcome this circumstance, a shift from 18- month to 24-month cycle operation is being considered in Korea. Therefore, in this study, loading patterns( LPs) for 24-month cycle operation of the Korean standard nuclear power plant(OPR-1000) are suggested and economic evaluations are performed. A single-zone LP with 89 fresh fuels was evaluated to be optimal for 24-month operation of OPR-1000 in terms of economic gain. The 24-month operation of OPR-1000 with this LP gives a profit of 7.073 million dollars per year compared to 18-month operation.
Abstract
Due to the tightened regulatory environment since the Fukushima accident, the capacity factor of Korean nuclear power plants has been declining since 2011. To overcome this circumstance, a shift from 18- month to 24-month cycle operation is being considered in Korea. Therefore, in this study, loading patterns( LPs) for 24-month cycle operation of the Korean standard nuclear power plant(OPR-1000) are suggested and economic evaluations are performed. A single-zone LP with 89 fresh fuels was evaluated to be optimal for 24-month operation of OPR-1000 in terms of economic gain. The 24-month operation of OPR-1000 with this LP gives a profit of 7.073 million dollars per year compared to 18-month operation.
참고문헌 (15)
- "Korea Hydro&Nuclear Power open nuclear power plant operation information"[URL]
- Yoshimasa Sakuya, "Feasibility study of 24-month cycle operation for boiling water reactor", Proceedings of GENES4, 2003, 1104~
- Kresimir Trontl, "24-month operating cycle containing gadolinium integral burnable absorbers for NPP Krsko", J. Energy, 62, pp.180~187 (2013)
- Aiman Dandi, "Feasibility of combinational burnable poison pins for 24-month cycle PWR reload core", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(2), pp.238~247 (2020), 한국원자력학회
- 조성주, "OPR1000 발전소의 핵연료 주기비분석을 통한 최적 배취 크기와 핵연료 농축도 결정", 에너지공학, 23(4), pp.256~262 (2014), 한국에너지학회
- S. K. You, "Evaluation of the Fuel Cycle Cost According to WH 16x16Advnaced Fuel Types", Transaction of Korean Nuclear Autumn Meeting (2001)
- An Economic Assessment for OPR1000 Longer Cycle Operation, "Seong Man Bae", Korean Society for Energy, 121~126 (2010)
- 최지원, "Verification and Validation of STREAM", RAST-K for PWR Analysis, 2019, pp.51(2), 356~368[DOI]
- The Nuclear Design Report for Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 Cycle 1, , Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, ~, pp.KAERI (1995), TR-542[DOI]
- The Nuclear Design Report for Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 Cycle 2, , Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, ~, pp.KAERI (1996), TR-605[DOI]
- Reload startup physics tests for pressurized water reactors, , ANS, ~, pp.ANSI (2005), ANS 19.6.1
- The Economics of Nuclear Fuel Cycle, , OECD, 1994
- "Fuel quentity& cost calculator"[URL]
- "Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy Notice No. 2022-11, Regulations on the Calculation of Radioactive Waste Management Cost and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Charge", Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of Korea, ~ (2022)
- "Electric Power Statistics Information System(EPSIS)"[URL]