본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of LBLOCA of APR1400 with 3D RPV model using TRACE

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

It is very difficult to capture the multi-dimensional phenomena such as asymmetric flow and temperature distributions with the one-dimensional (1D) model, obviously, due to its inherent limitation. In order to overcome such a limitation of the 1D representation, many state-of-the-art system codes have equipped a three-dimensional (3D) component for multi-dimensional analysis capability. In this study, a standard multi-dimensional analysis model of APR1400 (Advanced Power Reactor 1400) has been developed using TRACE (TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine). The entire reactor pressure vessel (RPV) of APR1400 has been modeled using a single 3D component. The fuels in the reactor core have been described with detailed and coarse representations, respectively, to figure out the impact of the fuel description. Using both 3D RPV models, a comparative analysis has been performed postulating a double-ended guillotine break at a cold leg. Based on the results of comparative analysis, it is revealed that both models show no significant difference in general plant behavior and the model with coarse fuel model could be used for faster transient analysis without reactor kinetics coupling. The analysis indicates that the asymmetric temperature and flow distributions are captured during the transient, and such nonuniform distributions contribute to asymmetric quenching behaviors during blowdown and reflood phases. Such asymmetries are directly connected to the figure of merits in the LBLOCA analysis. Therefore, it is recommended to employ a multi-dimensional RPV model with a detailed fuel description for a realistic safety analysis with the consideration of the spatial configuration of the reactor core

Abstract

It is very difficult to capture the multi-dimensional phenomena such as asymmetric flow and temperature distributions with the one-dimensional (1D) model, obviously, due to its inherent limitation. In order to overcome such a limitation of the 1D representation, many state-of-the-art system codes have equipped a three-dimensional (3D) component for multi-dimensional analysis capability. In this study, a standard multi-dimensional analysis model of APR1400 (Advanced Power Reactor 1400) has been developed using TRACE (TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine). The entire reactor pressure vessel (RPV) of APR1400 has been modeled using a single 3D component. The fuels in the reactor core have been described with detailed and coarse representations, respectively, to figure out the impact of the fuel description. Using both 3D RPV models, a comparative analysis has been performed postulating a double-ended guillotine break at a cold leg. Based on the results of comparative analysis, it is revealed that both models show no significant difference in general plant behavior and the model with coarse fuel model could be used for faster transient analysis without reactor kinetics coupling. The analysis indicates that the asymmetric temperature and flow distributions are captured during the transient, and such nonuniform distributions contribute to asymmetric quenching behaviors during blowdown and reflood phases. Such asymmetries are directly connected to the figure of merits in the LBLOCA analysis. Therefore, it is recommended to employ a multi-dimensional RPV model with a detailed fuel description for a realistic safety analysis with the consideration of the spatial configuration of the reactor core

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Alessandro Petruzzi, "Thermal-Hydraulic System Codes in Nulcear Reactor Safety and Qualification Procedures", Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2008, pp.1~16 (2008), Hindawi Limited[DOI]
  2. G.E. Wilson, "Historical insights in the development of best estimate plus uncertainty safety analysis", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 52, pp.2~9 (2013)
  3. F. D'Auria, "The Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty(BEPU)approach in licensing of current nuclear reactors", Nucl. Eng. Des, 248, pp.317~328 (2012)
  4. MARS-KS CODE MANUAL, Volume II: Input Requirements, vol. 2, "Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety", ~, pp.KINS (2018), RR-1822
  5. G. Geffraye, "CATHARE 2V2. 5_2 : a single version for various applications", Nucl. Eng. Des, 241, pp.4456~4463 (2011)
  6. TRACE V5.0 PATCH 6 USER’S MANUAL, Volume 1: Input Specification, "United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission", US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ~ (2020)
  7. TRACE V5.0 PATCH 6 THEORY MANUAL, Volume 1: Field Equations, Solution Methods, and Physical Models, "United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission", US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ~ (2020)
  8. H. Lin, "The development and assessment of TRACE", PARCS model for Lungmen ABWR, 2014, pp.273, 241~250
  9. H. Lin, "Station blackout mitigation strategies analysis for Maanshan PWR plant using TRACE", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 89, pp.1~18 (2016)
  10. C. Queral, "AP1000 Large-Break LOCA BEPU analysis with TRACE code", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 85, pp.576~589 (2015)
  11. R. Okawa, "Large-Break LOCA analysis with modified boiling heattransfer model in TRACE code", Nucl. Eng. Des, 346, pp.97~111 (2019)
  12. I. Clifford, "Assessing the effects of switching from multi-channel to three-dimensional nodalisations of the core in TRACE", Nucl. Eng. Des, 383, pp.111446~ (2021)
  13. PARCS, A Multi-Dimensional Two-Group Reactor Kinetics Code Based on the Nonlinear Analytic Nodal Method, "H. Joo", Purdue University, ~, pp.PU (1998), NE-98-26
  14. B. Miglierini, "Investigation of VVER-1000 rod ejection accident according to the phenomenon identification and ranking tables for PWR", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 108, pp.438~444 (2018)
  15. Pressurised Water Reactor Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) Benchmark, Volume IV: Results of Phase III on Coupled Core-Plant Transient Modeling, "N. Todorova", OECD, 2003, pp.21~
  16. Three-Dimensional Thermal-hydraulic Calculation and Uncertainty Evaluation of Large-Break LOCA in SKN Units, vol. 3, "Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety", 4~, pp.KINS (2012), AR-968
  17. Y. Bang, "Modeling scheme of the safety injection tank with fluidic device for best estimate calculation of LBLOCA", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 75, pp.605~610 (2015)
  18. Zirconium Metal-Water Oxidation Kinetics IV. Reaction Rate Studies, "J.V. Cathcart", Oak Ridge Natl. Lab, ~, pp.ORNL (1977), NUREG-17
  19. FRAPCON-3.4: A Computer Code for the Calculation of Steady-State Thermal-Mechanical Behavior of Oxide Fuel Rods for High Burnup, vol. 1, "K. J. Geelhood", Pacific Northwest Natl. Lab, ~, pp.NUREG (2011), CR-7022
  20. V.H. Ransom, "The RELAP5 choked flow model and application to a large scale flow test", ASME Heat Transfer Division, Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulic 1980 Topical Meeting (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

Transient full core analysis of PWR with multi-scale and multi-physics approach박주엽, 윤한영, 이재룡한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2024 · 제56권 제3호Analysis of control rod driving mechanism nozzle rupture with loss of safety injection at the ATLAS experimental facility using MARS-KS and TRACE김태완, 정현준한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2024 · 제56권 제6호Numerical study on thermal-hydraulics of external reactor vessel cooling in high-power reactor using MARS-KS1.5 code: CFD-aided estimation of natural circulation flow rate김응수, 박일웅, 송민섭, 이연건한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제1호Development of advanced containment thermal-hydraulic analysis methodology based on three-field model codes for APR1400김성용, 김정주, 김지수, 박석정, 박찬억, 윤선홍, 이제희, 조용주, 조제우, 지성호, 추연준, 한금호, 홍순준한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2025 · 제57권 제9호Study on the influence of flow blockage in severe accident scenario of CAP1400 reactorCao Sheng, Gao Pengcheng, Li Jishen, Miao Fan, Shan Jianqiang, Tang Shaowei, Yang Hao, Zhang Bin한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제3호Improvement of crossflow model of MULTID component in MARS-KS with inter-channel mixing model for enhancing analysis performance in rod bundle김태완, 이윤석한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제12호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (41건)