International case study comparing PSA modeling approaches for nuclear digital I&C – OECD/NEA task DIGMAP
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nuclear power plants are increasingly being equipped with digital I&C systems. Although some probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) models for the digital I&C of nuclear power plants have been constructed, there is currently no specific internationally agreed guidance for their modeling. This paper presents an initiative by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency called “Digital I&C PSA – Comparative application of DIGital I&C Modelling Approaches for PSA (DIGMAP)”, which aimed to advance the field towards practical and defendable modeling principles. The task, carried out in 2017–2021, used a simplified description of a plant focusing on the digital I&C systems important to safety, for which the participating organizations independently developed their own PSA models. Through comparison of the PSA models, sensitivity analyses as well as observations throughout the whole activity, both qualitative and quantitative lessons were learned. These include insights on failure behavior of digital I&C systems, experience from models with different levels of abstraction, benefits from benchmarking as well as major contributors to the core damage frequency and those with minor effect. The study also highlighted the challenges with modeling of large common cause component groups and the difficulties associated with estimation of key software and common cause failure parameters
Abstract
Nuclear power plants are increasingly being equipped with digital I&C systems. Although some probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) models for the digital I&C of nuclear power plants have been constructed, there is currently no specific internationally agreed guidance for their modeling. This paper presents an initiative by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency called “Digital I&C PSA – Comparative application of DIGital I&C Modelling Approaches for PSA (DIGMAP)”, which aimed to advance the field towards practical and defendable modeling principles. The task, carried out in 2017–2021, used a simplified description of a plant focusing on the digital I&C systems important to safety, for which the participating organizations independently developed their own PSA models. Through comparison of the PSA models, sensitivity analyses as well as observations throughout the whole activity, both qualitative and quantitative lessons were learned. These include insights on failure behavior of digital I&C systems, experience from models with different levels of abstraction, benefits from benchmarking as well as major contributors to the core damage frequency and those with minor effect. The study also highlighted the challenges with modeling of large common cause component groups and the difficulties associated with estimation of key software and common cause failure parameters
참고문헌 (46)
- Q Z Liang, "A review on the research status of reliability analysis of the digital instrument and control system in NPPs", IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 427(1), pp.012018~ (2020), IOP Publishing
- Review of Quantitative Software Reliability Methods, "T. -L. Chu", Brookhaven National Lab, ~, pp.BNL-94047-2010 (2010)
- Current State of Reliability Modeling Methodologies for Digital Systems and Their Acceptance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Assessments, "T. Aldemir", U.S. NRC, ~, pp.NUREG (2006), CR-6901
- STEFAN AUTHÉN, "RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS IN A PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 44(5), pp.471~482 (2012), 한국원자력학회[DOI]
- Seung Jun Lee, "PSA model with consideration of the effect of fault-tolerant techniques in digital I&C systems", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 87, pp.375~384 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Qingzhu Liang, "Reliability Assessment for a Safety-Related Digital Reactor Protection System Using Event-Tree", Fault-Tree (ET, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, pp.2020, 2020[DOI]
- Sang Hun Lee, "Reliability modeling of safety-critical network communication in a digitalized nuclear power plant", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 144, pp.285~295 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Risk Analysis of Various Design Architectures for High Safety-Significant Safety-Related Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems of Nuclear Power Plants during Accident Scenarios, "H. Bao", U.S. Department of Energy, ~, pp.INL (2022), RPT-22-70056
- John H. Bickel, "Risk implications of digital reactor protection system operating experience", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(1), pp.107~124 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Hyun Gook KANG, "A Quantitative Study on Risk Issues in Safety Feature Control System Design in Digitalized Nuclear Power Plant", Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 45(8), pp.850~858 (2008), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Amany S. Saber, "Reliability Analysis Model of the Digital Reactor Protection System", 2020 37th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC), pp.8~10 (2020), IEEE
- Hanaa Torkey, "Bayesian belief-based model for reliability improvement of the digital reactor protection system", Nuclear Science and Techniques, 31(10) (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Rania A. Fahmy, "Development of dynamic fault tree model for reactor protection system", Process Safety Progress, 40(2), pp.e12201~ (2020), Wiley[DOI]
- Zhanguo Ma, "Reliability model of the digital reactor protection system considering the repair time and common cause failure", Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 54(5), pp.539~551 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Jing Zhao, "Reliability of digital reactor protection system based on extenics", SpringerPlus, 5(1), pp.1953~ (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Y. Bulba, "Classification and research of the reactor protection instrumentation and control system functional safety markov models in a normal operation mode", International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications (2016)
- Ibrahim Ahmed, "Risk-informed approach to the safety improvement of the reactor protection system of the AGN-201K research reactor", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(4), pp.764~775 (2020), 한국원자력학회
- Marwa A. Shouman, "A Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Reliability Evaluation of the Reactor Protection System", Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(9), pp.6797~6809 (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Guidelines for Reliability Analysis of Digital Systems in PSA Context — Final Report, Nordic nuclear safety research, "S. Auth´en", ~, pp.NKS-330 (2015)
- Recommendations on Assessing Digital System Reliability in Probabilistic Risk Assessments of Nuclear Power Plants, "NEA", OECD, CSNI, pp.2009, ~[DOI]
- Failure Modes Taxonomy for Reliability Assessment of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems for Probabilistic Risk Analysis, "NEA", OECD, CSNI, pp.2015, ~[DOI]
- Digital I&C PSA – Comparative Application of Digital I&C Modelling Approaches for PSA, Main Report and Appendix A, "NEA", ~, pp.NEA (2023), CSNI[DOI]
- Digital I&C PSA – Comparative Application of Digital I&C Modelling Approaches for PSA, Appendices B0-B6, "NEA", ~, pp.NEA (2023), CSNI[DOI]
- M. Porthin, "Comparative application of digital I&C modeling approaches for PSA", International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2019) (2019)
- S.M. Shin, "An international joint research to explore the method for Digital I&C reliability assessment: OECD", NEA DIGMAP, 2019, ~
- Markus Porthin, "WGRISK DIGMAP: Comparison of PSA Modeling Approaches for Digital I&C", 12th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2021) (2021), American Nuclear Society
- A Benchmark Implementation of Two Dynamic Methodologies for the Reliability Modeling of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems, "T. Aldemir", U.S. NRC, ~, pp.NUREG (2009), CR-6985
- Manish Tripathi, "A Comparative Study on Reliability Analysis Methods for Safety Critical Systems Using Petri-Nets and Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology: A Case Study of Nuclear Power Plant", IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 71(2), pp.564~578 (2022), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)[DOI]
- Darpan Krishnakumar Shukla, "A Review of Recent Dynamic Reliability Analysis Methods and a Proposal for a Smart Component Methodology", Reliability, Safety and Hazard Assessment for Risk-Based Technologies, pp.267~291 (2019), Springer Singapore[DOI]
- T. Aldemir, "Probabilistic risk assessment modeling of digital instrumentation and control systems using two dynamic methodologies", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(10), pp.1011~1039 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- C.J. Garrett, "The dynamic flowgraph methodology for assessing the dependability of embedded software systems", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25(5), pp.824~840 (1995), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)[DOI]
- Jun Yang, "Bidirectional implementation of Markov", CCMT for dynamic reliability analysis with application to digital I&C systems, 2019, pp.185, 278~290[DOI]
- R.B.N. Vital, "Availability assessment of a nuclear reactor limitation system by a Timed Petri Net", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 152, pp.104380~ (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Modeling a Digital Feedwater Control System Using Traditional Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods, "T.-L. Chu", U.S.NRC, ~, pp.NUREG (2009), CR-6997
- Kwang Seop Son, "Development of state-based integrated dependability model of RPS in NPPs considering CCF and periodic testing effects at the early design phase", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193, pp.106645~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- DIGREL Example PSA Model Description, "J.-E. Holmberg", Risk Pilot, ~, pp.Report 14127_R001 (2016)
- Yuanfeng Cai, "Quantitative software reliability assessment methodology based on Bayesian belief networks and statistical testing for safety-critical software", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 145, pp.107593~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 서정일, "Experimental approach to evaluate software reliability in hardware-software integrated environment", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(7), pp.1462~1470 (2020), 한국원자력학회[DOI]
- Modelling of DIgital I&C, MODIG — interim report 2015, "S. Auth´en", Nordic Nuclear Safety Research, ~, pp.NKS-361 (2016)
- "Modeling of Digital Instrumentation and Control in Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments" (2012)[URL]
- M. Jockenh¨ovel-Barttfeld, "Modelling software failures of digital I&C in probabilistic safety analyses", ATW - Int. J. Nucl. Power, 60, pp.151~158 (2015)
- Hyun Gook Kang, "Development of a Bayesian belief network model for software reliability quantification of digital protection systems in nuclear power plants", Annals of Nuclear Energy, 120, pp.62~73 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- AREVA Design Control Document Rev. 5 - Tier 2 Chapter 19 - Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Severe Accident Evaluation, "AREVA", U.S.NRC, ~, pp.ML13262A290 (2013)
- Software Reliability Analysis for PSA: Failure Mode and Data Analysis, "O. B¨ackstr¨om", Nordic Nuclear Safety Research, ~, pp.NKS-341 (2015)
- "Functional Safety of Electrical/electronic/programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems - Part 6: Guidelines on the Application of IEC 61508-2 and IEC 61508-3, IEC 61508-6" (2010)[URL]
- 김만철, "Evaluation of Effectiveness of Fault-Tolerant Techniques in a Digital Instrumentation and Control System with a Fault Injection Experiment", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(3), pp.692~701 (2019), 한국원자력학회[DOI]