Multihazard capacity optimization of an NPP using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and sampling-based PSA
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami (Japan, 2011), regulatory efforts to mitigate external hazards have increased both the safety requirements and the total capital cost of nuclear power plants (NPPs). In these circumstances, identifying not only disaster robustness but also cost-effective capacity setting of NPPs has become one of the most important tasks for the nuclear power industry. A few studies have been performed to relocate the seismic capacity of NPPs, yet the effects of multiple hazards have not been accounted for in NPP capacity optimization. The major challenges in extending this problem to the multihazard dimension are (1) the high computational costs for both multihazard risk quantification and system-level optimization and (2) the lack of capital cost databases of NPPs. To resolve these issues, this paper proposes an effective method that identifies the optimal multihazard capacity of NPPs using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and the two-stage direct quantification of fault trees using Monte Carlo simulation method, called the two-stage DQFM. Also, a capacitybased indirect capital cost measure is proposed. Such a proposed method enables NPP to achieve safety and costeffectiveness against multi-hazard simultaneously within the computationally efficient platform. The proposed multihazard capacity optimization framework is demonstrated and tested with an earthquake–tsunami example
Abstract
After the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami (Japan, 2011), regulatory efforts to mitigate external hazards have increased both the safety requirements and the total capital cost of nuclear power plants (NPPs). In these circumstances, identifying not only disaster robustness but also cost-effective capacity setting of NPPs has become one of the most important tasks for the nuclear power industry. A few studies have been performed to relocate the seismic capacity of NPPs, yet the effects of multiple hazards have not been accounted for in NPP capacity optimization. The major challenges in extending this problem to the multihazard dimension are (1) the high computational costs for both multihazard risk quantification and system-level optimization and (2) the lack of capital cost databases of NPPs. To resolve these issues, this paper proposes an effective method that identifies the optimal multihazard capacity of NPPs using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and the two-stage direct quantification of fault trees using Monte Carlo simulation method, called the two-stage DQFM. Also, a capacitybased indirect capital cost measure is proposed. Such a proposed method enables NPP to achieve safety and costeffectiveness against multi-hazard simultaneously within the computationally efficient platform. The proposed multihazard capacity optimization framework is demonstrated and tested with an earthquake–tsunami example
참고문헌 (27)
- E. Choi, "A review of multihazard risk assessment:progress, potential, and challenges in the application to nuclear power plants", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc, 53, pp.101933~ (2020)
- J. E. Yang, "Fukushima Dai-Ichi accident : lessons learned and future actions from the risk perspectives", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 46(1), pp.27~38 (2014)
- B. Zhu, "Risk-based approach for optimum maintenance of bridges under traffic and earthquake loads", J. Struct. Eng, 139(3), pp.422~434 (2013)
- C. Gomez, "An optimization-based decision support framework for coupled pre-and post-earthquake infrastructure risk management", Struct. Saf, 77, pp.1~9 (2019)
- N. Xu, "The risk-return tradeoff in optimizing regional earthquake mitigation investment", Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(2), pp.133~146 (2007)
- A. Mondoro, "Optimal risk-based management of coastal bridges vulnerable to hurricanes", J. Infrastruct. Syst, 23(3), pp.04016046~ (2017)
- R. Rocchetta, "Risk assessment and risk-cost optimization of distributed power generation systems considering extreme weather conditions", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 136, pp.47~61 (2015)
- S. Chandrasekaran, "Retrofit optimization for resilience enhancement of bridges under multihazard scenario", J. Struct. Eng, 142(8), pp.C4015012~ (2016)
- A. Nikellis, "Multihazard risk assessment and cost–benefit analysis of a bridge–roadway–levee system", J. Struct. Eng, 146(5), pp.04020050~ (2020)
- M. Liu, "Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam, 34(3), pp.289~306 (2005)
- S. Kwag, "Robust design of seismic isolation system using constrained multi-objective optimization technique", KSCE J. Civ. Eng, 17(5), pp.1051~1063 (2013)
- E. Choi, "Development of Multi-Group Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for identifying critical post-disaster scenarios of lifeline networks", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc, 41, pp.101299~ (2019)
- E. Choi, "Cost-effective retrofits of power grids based on critical cascading failure scenarios identified by multi-group non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc, 49, pp.101640~ (2020)
- S. Kwag, "Multi-objective-based seismic fragility relocation for a Korean nuclear power plant", Nat. Hazards, 103(3), pp.3633~3659 (2020)
- C. Bolisetti, "Cost-and risk-based seismic design optimization of nuclear power plant safety systems", Nucl. Technol, 207(11), pp.1687~1711 (2021)
- E. Choi, "Development of a two-stage DQFM for efficient single-and multi-hazard risk quantification for nuclear facilities", Energies, 14(4), pp.1017~ (2021)
- F. L. Leverenz, "User’s Guide for the WAM-BAM Computer Code (No. PB–249624)", Science Applications. Inc, ~ (1976)
- Y. Watanabe, "Development of the DQFM method to consider the effect of correlation of component failures in seismic PSA of nuclear power plant", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 79(3), pp.265~279 (2003)
- S. Kwag, "Development of efficient external multihazard risk quantification methodology for nuclear facilities", Energies, 12(20), pp.3925~ (2019)
- K. Deb, "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm : nsga-II", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput, 6(2), pp.182~197 (2002)
- S. Kameshwar, "Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards", Eng. Struct, 78, pp.154~166 (2014)
- A. P. Bradley, "The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms", Pattern Recogn, 30(7), pp.1145~1159 (1997)
- Development of Site Risk Assessment & Management Technology Including Extreme External Events, "KAERI", Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, ~, pp.KAERI (2017), RR-4225[DOI]
- B. Ellingwood, "Validation studies of seismic PRAs", Nucl. Eng. Des, 123, pp.189~196 (1990)
- G. Ochoa, "Setting the mutation rate: scope and limitations of the 1", L heuristic, 2002, ~[DOI]
- S. Kwag, "Toward improvement of samplingbased seismic probabilistic safety assessment method for nuclear facilities using composite distribution and adaptive discretization", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 215, pp.107809~ (2021)
- Kwag, S., "On Improving Seismic Risk and Cost for Research Reactor Based on Multi-Objective Optimization Considering Seismic Correlation", ~