Towards achieving status of green economy in OECD countries: Articulating the role of nuclear energy, greenfield investment and environmental taxation
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In today’s era, the green economy has become the central focus worldwide, along with the clean energy transition. Unfortunately, the current economic development model flourishes at the expense of the natural environment and ecosystems. Thereby, the concept of green economy gets immense attention among scholars and policy analyst. Most countries are dependent on energy import due to limited and unsustainable natural resource use. In this context, environmental taxation can play a key role in restricting the unsustainable use of natural resources, and nuclear energy can reduce energy import dependency, helping to shift from conventional growth to green economic growth. In this context, this study is an attempt to explore the relationship between nuclear energy, environmental taxation, greenfield investment, and the green economy in a panel of 16 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies from 2000 to 2019. To get empirical estimate the study relies on Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MM-QR) approach. Interestingly, this study found that nuclear energy development discourages green economic growth across all quantiles in OECD countries. Furthermore, the study found that environmental taxation helps OECD countries achieve green economy status. Greenfield investments are another factor promotes the green economy. Climate policy measures are suggested in line with increasing share of nuclear energy in energy mix through greenfield investment in energy sector
Abstract
In today’s era, the green economy has become the central focus worldwide, along with the clean energy transition. Unfortunately, the current economic development model flourishes at the expense of the natural environment and ecosystems. Thereby, the concept of green economy gets immense attention among scholars and policy analyst. Most countries are dependent on energy import due to limited and unsustainable natural resource use. In this context, environmental taxation can play a key role in restricting the unsustainable use of natural resources, and nuclear energy can reduce energy import dependency, helping to shift from conventional growth to green economic growth. In this context, this study is an attempt to explore the relationship between nuclear energy, environmental taxation, greenfield investment, and the green economy in a panel of 16 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies from 2000 to 2019. To get empirical estimate the study relies on Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MM-QR) approach. Interestingly, this study found that nuclear energy development discourages green economic growth across all quantiles in OECD countries. Furthermore, the study found that environmental taxation helps OECD countries achieve green economy status. Greenfield investments are another factor promotes the green economy. Climate policy measures are suggested in line with increasing share of nuclear energy in energy mix through greenfield investment in energy sector
참고문헌 (29)
- Y. Shang, "The impacts of energy resource and tourism on green growth : evidence from Asian economies", Resour. Pol, 81, pp.103359~ (2023)[DOI]
- L. Zhan, "Development and outlook of advanced nuclear energy technology", Energy Strategy Rev, 34, pp.100630~ (2021)[DOI]
- L. Liu, "The role of nuclear energy in the carbon neutrality goal", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 162, pp.104772~ (2023)[DOI]
- A. Huang, "Budgeting for a greener future : asymmetric nexus between nuclear energy technology budgets and CO2 emissions", Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 202, pp.123321~ (2024)[DOI]
- M. Murshed, "Can renewable energy transition drive green growth? The role of good governance in promoting carbon emission-adjusted economic growth in Next Eleven countries", Innov. Green Dev, 3, pp.100123~ (2024)[DOI]
- Y. Q. Zhang, "The impact of non-renewable energy production and energy usage on carbon emissions: evidence from China", Energy Environ (2023)[DOI]
- M. F. Bashir, "Nuclear energy consumption, energy access and energy poverty: policy implications for the COP27 and environmental sustainability", Technol. Soc, 75, pp.102385~ (2023)[DOI]
- W. Gao, "Progress in Nuclear Energy How does nuclear energy consumption contribute to or hinder green growth in major nuclear energyconsuming countries", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 170, pp.105111~ (2024)[DOI]
- S. T. Hassan, "The heterogeneous impact of geopolitical risk and environment-related innovations on greenhouse gas emissions : the role of nuclear and renewable energy in the circular economy", Gondwana Res, 127, pp.144~155 (2024)[DOI]
- M. Sadiq, "Do globalization and nuclear energy intensify the environmental costs in top nuclear energy-consuming countries?", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 156, pp.104533~ (2023)[DOI]
- Danish, "The effect of nuclear energy on the environment in the context of globalization : consumption vs production-based CO2 emissions", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 54, pp.1312~1320 (2022)[DOI]
- OECD, "Sustainable development", Res. Handb. Int. Environ. Law, pp.130~150 (2021)[DOI]
- M. Sadiq, "Does nuclear energy consumption contribute to human development? Modeling the effects of public debt and trade globalization in an OECD heterogeneous panel", J. Clean. Prod, 375, pp.133965~ (2022)[DOI]
- M. Simionescu, "The renewable and nuclear energy-economic growth nexus in the context of quality of governance", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 157, pp.104590~ (2023)[DOI]
- T. Christoforidis, "The dynamic links between nuclear energy and sustainable economic growth. Do institutions matter?", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 139, pp.103866~ (2021)[DOI]
- M. Luqman, "Nuclear Energy , Renewable Energy and Economic Growth in Pakistan : Evidence from Non-linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model", 139~ (2019)
- S. T. Hassan, "Impact of economic complexity index, globalization, and nuclear energy consumption on ecological footprint: first insights in OECD context", Energy, 263, pp.125628~ (2023)[DOI]
- Danish, "The effect of nuclear energy on the environment nexus in the context of globalization: consumption vs production-based CO2emissions", Nucl. Eng. Technol (2021)[DOI]
- S. T. Hassan, "Is public service transportation increase environmental contamination in China? The role of nuclear energy consumption and technological change", Energy, 238, pp.121890~ (2022)[DOI]
- S. Stjepanovi´c, "A new database on Green GDP; 1970–2019 : a framework for assessing the green economy", Oeconomia Copernic, 13, pp.949~975 (2022)[DOI]
- Saˇsa Stjepanovi´c, "A new database on Green GDP;1970–2019 : a framework for assessing the green economy", Copernicana, 13, pp.949~975 (2022)[DOI]
- I. A. Canay, "A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data", Econom. J, 14, pp.368~386 (2011)[DOI]
- R. Koenker, "Quantile regression for longitudinal data", J. Multivariate Anal, 91, pp.74~89 (2004)[DOI]
- M. H. Pesaran, "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels", J. Econom, 142, pp.50~93 (2008)[DOI]
- J. Blomquist, "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation", Econ. Lett, 121, pp.374~378 (2013)[DOI]
- Danish, "Testing the pollution haven hypothesis on the pathway of sustainable development : accounting the role of nuclear energy consumption", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 53, pp.2746~2752 (2021)[DOI]
- "6 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Not the Way to a Green and Peaceful World" (2022)[URL]
- A. Razzaq, "Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy : fresh insights from QARDL approach", Sustain. Dev, 29, pp.176~193 (2021)[DOI]
- A. Kwilinski, "Greenfield investment as a catalyst of green economic growth", Energies, 16, pp.1~16 (2023)[DOI]