Manipulation under Anesthesia for Stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study evaluated the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the degree of joint motion recovery after MUA.Materials and Methods: A total of 4,449 TKAs (2,973 patients) were performed between March 2000 and August 2014. Cases that underwent MUA for stiffness after TKA were reviewed. TKAs were performed using the conventional procedure in 329 cases and using the minimally invasive procedure in 4,120 cases. The preoperative range of joint motion, timing of manipulation, diagnosis and the range of joint motion before and after MUA were retrospectively investigated.Results: MUA was carried out in 22 cases (16 patients), resulting in the incidence of 0.5%. The incidence after the conventional procedure was 1.2% and 0.4% after the minimally invasive procedure. In the manipulated knees, the preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 102.5o±26.7o, and the preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 19 cases, rheumatoid arthritis in two, and infection sequela in one. MUA was performed 4.7±3.0 weeks after TKA. The average ROM was 64.5o±13.5o before manipulation. At an average of 64.3±41.3 months after manipulation, the ROM was recovered to 113.4o±31.2o, which was an additional 49.9o improvement in flexion. Conclusions: The satisfactory recovery of joint movement was achieved when MUA for stiffness was performed relatively early after TKA.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the degree of joint motion recovery after MUA.Materials and Methods: A total of 4,449 TKAs (2,973 patients) were performed between March 2000 and August 2014. Cases that underwent MUA for stiffness after TKA were reviewed. TKAs were performed using the conventional procedure in 329 cases and using the minimally invasive procedure in 4,120 cases. The preoperative range of joint motion, timing of manipulation, diagnosis and the range of joint motion before and after MUA were retrospectively investigated.Results: MUA was carried out in 22 cases (16 patients), resulting in the incidence of 0.5%. The incidence after the conventional procedure was 1.2% and 0.4% after the minimally invasive procedure. In the manipulated knees, the preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 102.5o±26.7o, and the preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 19 cases, rheumatoid arthritis in two, and infection sequela in one. MUA was performed 4.7±3.0 weeks after TKA. The average ROM was 64.5o±13.5o before manipulation. At an average of 64.3±41.3 months after manipulation, the ROM was recovered to 113.4o±31.2o, which was an additional 49.9o improvement in flexion. Conclusions: The satisfactory recovery of joint movement was achieved when MUA for stiffness was performed relatively early after TKA.
참고문헌 (26)
- Seyler TM, "Functional problems and arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89(Suppl 3), pp.59~69 (2007)
- Mohammed R, "Manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following knee arthroplasty", Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 91, pp.220~223 (2009)
- Scranton PE Jr, "Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 16, pp.428~435 (2001)
- Hutchinson JR, "Results of open arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87, pp.1357~1360 (2005)
- Keeney JA, "Revision total knee arthroplasty for restricted motion", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 440, pp.135~140 (2005)
- Bae DK, "Arthroscopy of symptomatic total knee replacements", Arthroscopy, 11, pp.664~671 (1995)
- Rowe PJ, "Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life?", Gait Posture, 12, pp.143~155 (2000)
- Laubenthal KN, "A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living", Phys Ther, 52, pp.34~43 (1972)
- Nicholls DW, "Revision surgery for stiff total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 5(Suppl), pp.S73~S77 (1990)
- Christensen CP, "Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 17, pp.409~415 (2002)
- Kim J, "Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86, pp.1479~1484 (2004)
- Scuderi GR, "The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution", J Arthroplasty, 20(4 Suppl 2), pp.23~26 (2005)
- Yercan HS, "Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty : prevalence, management and outcomes", Knee, 13, pp.111~117 (2006)
- Laskin RS, "Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 19(4 Suppl 1), pp.41~46 (2004)
- Fisher DA, "Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 22(6 Suppl 2), pp.39~42 (2007)
- Furia JP, "Heterotopic ossification following primary total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 10, pp.413~419 (1995)
- Harden RN, "Prospective examination of pain-related and psychological predictors of CRPS-like phenomena following total knee arthroplasty : a preliminary study", Pain, 106, pp.393~400 (2003)
- Mariani PP, "Histological and structural study of the adhesive tissue in knee fibroarthrosis : a clinical-pathological correlation", Arthroscopy, 13, pp.313~318 (1997)
- Shoji H, "Improved range of motion with the Y", S total knee arthroplasty system, 1987, pp.(218), 150~163
- Fox JL, "The role of manipulation following total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 63, pp.357~362 (1981)
- Daluga D, "Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables", J Arthroplasty, 6, pp.119~128 (1991)
- Esler CN, "Manipulation of total knee replacements", Is the flexion gained retained? J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, pp.27~29 (1999)
- Rubinstein RA Jr, "The incidence and results of manipulation after primary total knee arthroplasty", Knee, 17, pp.29~32 (2010)
- Bawa HS, "Predictors of range of motion in patients undergoing manipulation after TKA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.258~263 (2013)
- Sherry E, "Minimal invasive surgery for hip replacement: a new technique using the NILNAV hip system", ANZ J Surg, 73, pp.157~161 (2003)
- McAllister CM, "The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 23, pp.10~18 (2008)