Mid-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Far Anteromedial Portal Technique
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using two anteromedial (AM) portals by comparing with short-term follow-up results.Materials and Methods: Fifty patients who were treated by ACL reconstruction using a two AM portal technique were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up period was at least 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 68.5±13.9 months. The mid-term clinical outcomes were compared with short-term (≥12 months) results. For the assessment of knee stability, anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the Lachman test and the KT-2000. Rotational stability was evaluated using pivot shift test. For clinical assessment, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were used. results: The average anterior translation was 2.1±1.4 mm at the short-term follow-up and 2.8±1.8 mm at the mid-term follow-up. Stability and mid-term clinical outcomes were not significantly improved compared to the short-term follow-up results. At the mid-term follow-up, anteroposterior (AP) instability assessed by the KT-2000 was slightly increased, but still acceptable. On the other clinical physical evaluation, there was no statistically significant difference.conclusions: The short-term and mid-term outcomes of ACL reconstruction using the two AM portal technique were not significantly different except for AP stability although the value was less than 3 mm at both follow-ups. Therefore, this operative technique could be considered a satisfactory alternative for ACL reconstruction.
Abstract
purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using two anteromedial (AM) portals by comparing with short-term follow-up results.Materials and Methods: Fifty patients who were treated by ACL reconstruction using a two AM portal technique were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up period was at least 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 68.5±13.9 months. The mid-term clinical outcomes were compared with short-term (≥12 months) results. For the assessment of knee stability, anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the Lachman test and the KT-2000. Rotational stability was evaluated using pivot shift test. For clinical assessment, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were used. results: The average anterior translation was 2.1±1.4 mm at the short-term follow-up and 2.8±1.8 mm at the mid-term follow-up. Stability and mid-term clinical outcomes were not significantly improved compared to the short-term follow-up results. At the mid-term follow-up, anteroposterior (AP) instability assessed by the KT-2000 was slightly increased, but still acceptable. On the other clinical physical evaluation, there was no statistically significant difference.conclusions: The short-term and mid-term outcomes of ACL reconstruction using the two AM portal technique were not significantly different except for AP stability although the value was less than 3 mm at both follow-ups. Therefore, this operative technique could be considered a satisfactory alternative for ACL reconstruction.
참고문헌 (24)
- Buss DD, "Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. Results after twenty-four to forty-two months", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 75, pp.1346~1355 (1993)
- Feller JA, "A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 31, pp.564~573 (2003)
- Shelbourne KD, "Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 18, pp.292~299 (1990)
- Lee YS, "Comparative analysis of femoral tunnels between outside-in and transtibial double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a 3-dimensional computed tomography study", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.1417~1423 (2012)
- Aglietti P, "Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 454, pp.108~113 (2007)
- Jepsen CF, "Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study", Arthroscopy, 23, pp.1326~1333 (2007)
- Kanamori A, "The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament : a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test", Arthroscopy, 18, pp.394~398 (2002)
- Seon JK, "Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double-and single-bundle reconstructions", Int Orthop, 33, pp.425~429 (2009)
- Yamamoto Y, "Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement", Am J Sports Med, 32, pp.1825~1832 (2004)
- Mae T, "Single-versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique : Biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator", Arthroscopy, 17, pp.708~716 (2001)
- Bedi A, "Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique", Arthroscopy, 27, pp.380~390 (2011)
- Chang CB, "Comparisons of femoral tunnel position and length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques", Arthroscopy, 27, pp.1389~1394 (2011)
- Harner CD, "Double bundle or double trouble?", Arthroscopy, 20, pp.1013~1014 (2004)
- Cohen SB, "Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of a central medial portal", Arthroscopy, 23(325), pp.e1~e5 (2007)
- Myung-Ku Kim, "Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by the Two Anteromedial Portal Method: The Comparison of Transportal and Transtibial Techniques", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 23(4), pp.213~219 (2011), 대한슬관절학회
- Samuelson TS, "Anterior cruciate ligament graft rotation. Reproduction of normal graft rotation", Am J Sports Med, 24, pp.67~71 (1996)
- Loh JC, "Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement : 2002 Richard O’Connor Award paper", Arthroscopy, 19, pp.297~304 (2003)
- O’Neill DB, "Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament : a prospective randomized analysis of three techniques", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, pp.803~813 (1996)
- Scopp JM, "The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts", Arthroscopy, 20, pp.294~299 (2004)
- Woo SL, "The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon : a cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84, pp.907~914 (2002)
- Rue JP, "Femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a cadaveric study relating transtibial lateralized femoral tunnel position to the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle femoral origins of the anterior cruciate ligament", Am J Sports Med, 36, pp.73~79 (2008)
- Alentorn-Geli E, "The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 18, pp.1013~1037 (2010)
- Basdekis G, "Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 24, pp.459~464 (2008)
- Zantop T, "The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation", Am J Sports Med, 35, pp.223~227 (2007)