Safety and Efficacy of 6.2 mm Patellar Button in Resurfacing Less than 20 mm Thin Patella: A Matched Pair Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Restoring the native patellar thickness after patellar resurfacing provides optimal function of the knee after arthroplasty and minimises complications related to the patellofemoral articulation. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a thin patellar button (6.2 mm) in patients with a patella thickness of less than 20 mm during total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case control study. A total of 54 female patients with an intraoperative patellar thickness of <20 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 6.2 mm in thickness were identified (group 1). They were matched with 54 patients with a patellar thickness of 20–23 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 8 mm (group 2), based on age, sex, body mass index, and deformity. A clinical and radiological evaluation was done at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: The preoperative mean patellar thickness was 18.94±1.07 mm and was restored to 19.06±0.79 mm in group 1, as compared to 21.63±0.99 mm and 21.72±0.99 mm in group 2. The mean postoperative range of motion was 122.22°±9.25° in group 1 and 123.52°±8.72° in group 2 (p=0.13). No patellar bone or button related complications were observed in any patient in either group.Conclusions: The 6.2 mm thin patella is useful to restore the native thickness in patients with a patellar thickness of less than 20 mm without risk of button fracture, loosening or overstuffing.
Abstract
Purpose: Restoring the native patellar thickness after patellar resurfacing provides optimal function of the knee after arthroplasty and minimises complications related to the patellofemoral articulation. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a thin patellar button (6.2 mm) in patients with a patella thickness of less than 20 mm during total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case control study. A total of 54 female patients with an intraoperative patellar thickness of <20 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 6.2 mm in thickness were identified (group 1). They were matched with 54 patients with a patellar thickness of 20–23 mm, resurfaced with a patellar button of 8 mm (group 2), based on age, sex, body mass index, and deformity. A clinical and radiological evaluation was done at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: The preoperative mean patellar thickness was 18.94±1.07 mm and was restored to 19.06±0.79 mm in group 1, as compared to 21.63±0.99 mm and 21.72±0.99 mm in group 2. The mean postoperative range of motion was 122.22°±9.25° in group 1 and 123.52°±8.72° in group 2 (p=0.13). No patellar bone or button related complications were observed in any patient in either group.Conclusions: The 6.2 mm thin patella is useful to restore the native thickness in patients with a patellar thickness of less than 20 mm without risk of button fracture, loosening or overstuffing.
참고문헌 (30)
- Merican AM, "Patellar thickness and lateral retinacular release affects patellofemoral kinematics in total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22, pp.526~533 (2014)[DOI]
- Reuben JD, "Effect of patella thickness on patella strain following total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 6, pp.251~258 (1991)[DOI]
- Lee QJ, "Effect of patellar thickness on early results of total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22, pp.3093~3099 (2014)[DOI]
- Lie DT, "Patellar resection during total knee arthroplasty: effect on bone strain and fracture risk", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 13, pp.203~208 (2005)[DOI]
- Tanikawa H, "Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and patellofemoral pressure", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.280~285 (2017)[DOI]
- Abolghasemian M, "Effect of patellar thickness on knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical and experimental study", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.80~84 (2014)[DOI]
- [URL]
- Dong-Kyoon Kim, "Are Korean Patients Different from Other Ethnic Groups in Total Knee Arthroplasty?", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 27(4), pp.199~206 (2015), 대한슬관절학회
- Seo JG, "A case-control study of spontaneous patellar fractures following primary total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94, pp.908~913 (2012)
- Metsna V, "Anterior knee pain following total knee replacement correlates with the OARSI score of the cartilage of the patella", Acta Orthop, 85, pp.427~432 (2014)[DOI]
- Meftah M, "The effect of patellar replacement technique on patellofemoral complications and anterior knee pain", J Arthroplasty, 27, pp.1075~1080 (2012)[DOI]
- Jones AC, "Radiographic assessment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis", Ann Rheum Dis, 52, pp.655~658 (1993)[DOI]
- Ewald FC, "The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (248), pp.9~12 (1989)
- Camp CL, "Surgical technique for symmetric patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty", J Knee Surg, 26, pp.281~284 (2013)[DOI]
- Hofmann AA, "Patellar component medialization in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 12, pp.155~160 (1997)[DOI]
- Nikolaus OB, "Lateral patellar facet impingement after primary total knee arthroplasty: it does exist", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.970~976 (2014)[DOI]
- Gopinathan P, "Patello-femoral clunk syndrome-current concepts", J Orthop, 11, pp.55~57 (2014)[DOI]
- Hozack WJ, "The patellar clunk syndrome: a complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (241), pp.203~208 (1989)
- Strachan RK, "A technique of staged lateral release to correct patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.735~742 (2009)[DOI]
- Pierson JL, "The effect of stuffing the patellofemoral compartment on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp.2195~2203 (2007)
- Na SE, "A new high-flexion knee scoring system to eliminate the ceiling effect", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.584~593 (2012)[DOI]
- Kim TK, "Clinical implications of anthropometric patellar dimensions for TKA in Asians", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.1007~1014 (2009)[DOI]
- Pierce TP, "Is there an ideal patellar thickness following total knee arthroplasty?", Orthopedics, 39, pp.187~192 (2016)[DOI]
- Bengs BC, "The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.650~655 (2006)[DOI]
- Devers BN, "Does greater knee flexion increase patient function and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty?", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.178~186 (2011)[DOI]
- Singh VK, "Atraumatic patellar prosthesis dislocation with patellar tendon injury following a total knee arthroplasty: a case report", J Med Case Rep, 4, pp.11~ (2010)[DOI]
- Hamilton WG, "Patellar cut and composite thickness: the influence on postoperative motion and complications in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.1803~1807 (2017)[DOI]
- Hsu HC, "Influence of patellar thickness on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 11, pp.69~80 (1996)[DOI]
- Maniar RN, "Surgical technique: lateral retinaculum release in knee arthroplasty using a stepwise, outside-in technique", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.2854~2863 (2012)[DOI]
- Clarke H, "Patellar prosthesis design needs to be optimized for caucasian female patients", Orthop Proc, 95-B(Supp 15), pp.40~ (2013)