Knee Examination under Anesthesia: Development of a Predictive Score for Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of knee examination under anesthesia (EUA) and develop a prognostic score for partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.Materials and Methods: A total of 229 patients with an ACL injury were included. Knee EUA was performed using the Lachman test, pivot shift test and arthrometric maximum manual sidetoside difference (AMMD) test. The arthroscopic examination is the gold standard for the diagnosis of partial and complete ACL tears, which was compared with EUA findings. Multivariate logistic regression was estimated, and the significant variables were used to develop a predictive score.Results: The relative risk for a complete tear with Lachman 2+ was 8.55 (range, 3.5 to 20.7) and 53.04 (range, 6.7 to 417) with Lachman 3+, compared to Lachman 1+. Negative pivot shift was reported in 23 cases in the partial tear group (76.7%) and in 22 in the complete tear group (11.1%). The AMMD was 3.5 mm in the partial tear group and 5.4 mm in the complete tear group (p<0.05). A prognostic score of less than five suggested the presence of a partial ACL tear. The score showed 81.1% sensitivity and 68.7% specificity.Conclusions: Partial ACL tears can be differentiated from complete tears with Lachman test, pivot shift test, and AMMD test.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of knee examination under anesthesia (EUA) and develop a prognostic score for partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.Materials and Methods: A total of 229 patients with an ACL injury were included. Knee EUA was performed using the Lachman test, pivot shift test and arthrometric maximum manual sidetoside difference (AMMD) test. The arthroscopic examination is the gold standard for the diagnosis of partial and complete ACL tears, which was compared with EUA findings. Multivariate logistic regression was estimated, and the significant variables were used to develop a predictive score.Results: The relative risk for a complete tear with Lachman 2+ was 8.55 (range, 3.5 to 20.7) and 53.04 (range, 6.7 to 417) with Lachman 3+, compared to Lachman 1+. Negative pivot shift was reported in 23 cases in the partial tear group (76.7%) and in 22 in the complete tear group (11.1%). The AMMD was 3.5 mm in the partial tear group and 5.4 mm in the complete tear group (p<0.05). A prognostic score of less than five suggested the presence of a partial ACL tear. The score showed 81.1% sensitivity and 68.7% specificity.Conclusions: Partial ACL tears can be differentiated from complete tears with Lachman test, pivot shift test, and AMMD test.
참고문헌 (17)
- Zantop T, "The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation", Am J Sports Med, 35, pp.223~227 (2007)[DOI]
- Ochi M, "Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 22, pp.463~ (2006)
- Serrano-Fernandez JM, "Augmentation technique for partial ACL ruptures using semitendinosus tendon in the over-the-top position", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 18, pp.1214~1218 (2010)[DOI]
- Sonnery-Cottet B, "Selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tears: a series of 36 patients with mean 24 months follow-up", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 18, pp.47~51 (2010)[DOI]
- Crain EH, "Variation in anterior cruciate ligament scar pattern: does the scar pattern affect anterior laxity in anterior cruciate ligamentdeficient knees?", Arthroscopy, 21, pp.19~24 (2005)[DOI]
- Adachi N, "Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy: a minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 120, pp.128~133 (2000)[DOI]
- Adachi N, "Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense", Acta Orthop Scand, 73, pp.330~334 (2002)[DOI]
- Nakamae A, "Biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament remnants: how long do they contribute to knee stability after injury in patients with complete tears?", Arthroscopy, 26, pp.1577~1585 (2010)[DOI]
- Lane CG, "The pivot shift", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 16, pp.679~688 (2008)[DOI]
- Bach BR Jr, "Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72, pp.1299~1306 (1990)[DOI]
- Ochi M, "A minimum 2-year follow-up after selective anteromedial or posterolateral bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.117~122 (2009)[DOI]
- Fritschy D, "Can we predict the outcome of a partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament? A prospective study of 43 cases", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 5, pp.2~5 (1997)[DOI]
- Bak K, "Isolated partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long-term follow-up of 56 cases", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 5, pp.66~71 (1997)[DOI]
- Sonnery-Cottet B, "Arthroscopic identification of isolated tear of the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.728~732 (2009)[DOI]
- Dejour D, "The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears", Arthroscopy, 29, pp.491~499 (2013)[DOI]
- Yoon KH, "Standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus isolated singlebundle augmentation with hamstring autograft", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.1265~1274 (2009)[DOI]
- Liu W, "A modeling study of partial ACL injury: simulated KT-2000 arthrometer tests", J Biomech Eng, 124, pp.294~301 (2002)[DOI]