One-year Oxford knee scores should be used in preference to 6-month scores when assessing the outcome of total knee arthroplasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether there was a clinically significant difference in the mean Oxford knee score (OKS) between 6 and 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to identify variables associated with a clinically significant change in the OKS between 6 and 12 months. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using an established arthroplasty database of 1574 primary TKA procedures. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, OKS and EuroQoL 5- domain (EQ-5D) score were collected preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. A clinically significant change in the OKS was defined as 5 points or more. Results: There was a 1.1-point increase in the OKS between 6 and 12 months postoperatively, which was statistically significant (95% confidence (CI) 0.8–1.3, p < 0.0001). There were 381 (24.2%) patients who had a clinically significant improvement in their OKS from 6 to 12 months. After adjusting for confounding, patients with a lower BMI (p = 0.028), without diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), a better preoperative OKS (p < 0.001) or a worse 6-month OKS (p < 0.001) were more likely to have a clinically significant improvement. A 6-month OKS < 36 points was a reliable predictor of a clinically significant improvement in the 6-month to 12-month OKS (area under the curve 0.73, 95% CI 0.70–0.75, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, there was no clinically significant change in the OKS from 6 to 12 months; however, a clinically significant improvement was observed in approximately a quarter of patients and was more likely in those scoring less than 36 points at 6 months. Level of evidence: retrospective diagnostic study, level III.
Abstract
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether there was a clinically significant difference in the mean Oxford knee score (OKS) between 6 and 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to identify variables associated with a clinically significant change in the OKS between 6 and 12 months. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using an established arthroplasty database of 1574 primary TKA procedures. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, OKS and EuroQoL 5- domain (EQ-5D) score were collected preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. A clinically significant change in the OKS was defined as 5 points or more. Results: There was a 1.1-point increase in the OKS between 6 and 12 months postoperatively, which was statistically significant (95% confidence (CI) 0.8–1.3, p < 0.0001). There were 381 (24.2%) patients who had a clinically significant improvement in their OKS from 6 to 12 months. After adjusting for confounding, patients with a lower BMI (p = 0.028), without diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), a better preoperative OKS (p < 0.001) or a worse 6-month OKS (p < 0.001) were more likely to have a clinically significant improvement. A 6-month OKS < 36 points was a reliable predictor of a clinically significant improvement in the 6-month to 12-month OKS (area under the curve 0.73, 95% CI 0.70–0.75, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, there was no clinically significant change in the OKS from 6 to 12 months; however, a clinically significant improvement was observed in approximately a quarter of patients and was more likely in those scoring less than 36 points at 6 months. Level of evidence: retrospective diagnostic study, level III.
참고문헌 (17)
- Natalie J. Collins, "Patient-Reported Outcomes for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty", Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 28(3), pp.367~394 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Jill Dawson, "Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 80(1), pp.63~69 (1998), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- A. D. Liddle, "Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty", The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(6), pp.793~801 (2015), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- David J. Beard, "Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(1), pp.73~79 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Nicholas D. Clement, "Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: where do we draw the line?", Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 133(5), pp.689~694 (2013), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- N. D. Clement, "Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is affected by their general physical well-being", Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 21(11), pp.2638~2646 (2013), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- John Browne, "What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? a systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme", Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), pp.128~ (2013), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Chloe E. H. Scott, "Five-year survivorship and patient-reported outcome of the Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23(6), pp.1676~1683 (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- D. P. Williams, "Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement", The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B(1), pp.45~51 (2013), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- David J Beard, "The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial", The Lancet, 394(10200), pp.746~756 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- P. N. Baker, "The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 89-B(7), pp.893~900 (2007), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- Edward Burn, "Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales", BMJ Open, 8(4), pp.e020977~ (2018), BMJ[DOI]
- M. Herdman, "Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)", Quality of Life Research, 20(10), pp.1727~1736 (2011), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- N. D. Clement, "The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 22(8), pp.1933~1939 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- K. Giesinger, "Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty", Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22(2), pp.184~189 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- N. D. Clement, "Increased symptoms of stiffness 1 year after total knee arthroplasty are associated with a worse functional outcome and lower rate of patient satisfaction", Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 27(4), pp.1196~1203 (2019), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Jessica Maxwell, "The Influence of the Contralateral Knee Prior to Knee Arthroplasty on Post-Arthroplasty Function: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study", Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 95(11), pp.989~993 (2013), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]