Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background: With more complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures there is often the need to use more constrained prostheses. This study aims to investigate patient-relevant outcomes following primary and revision rotating-hinged total knee arthroplasty. Methods: Electronic searches were performed using four databases from their date of inception to January 2021. Relevant studies were identified, with data extracted and analysed using PRIMSA guidelines. Results: Nineteen studies were included, producing a cohort of 568 primary and 413 revision rotating hinge total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Survival was assessed at 1-, 5-, and 10-year post-implantation. Sensitivity analyses based on person-time incidence ratios (PTIRs) were prespecified for studies not reporting survival at these timepoints. From the primary hinge TKA cohort, the median survival at 1 year was 93.4% and at 10 years it was 87%. The PTIR at long-term follow-up of this primary cohort was 1.07 (95% CI 0.4–1.7) per 100 person-years. From the revision hinge TKA cohort, the median survival at 1 year was 79.6%, and at 10 years it was 65.1%. The PTIR at long term-follow-up of this revision cohort was 1.55 (95% CI 0.9–2.3) per 100 person-years. Post-operative flexion range of motion (ROM) was 110° for primary hinge TKA and 103° for revision hinge TKA. Compared with baseline, the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) improved for both groups post-operatively (primary: KSS 17 to 86, KSFS 28 to 58; revision: KSS 37 to 82, KSFS 34 to 61). Conclusion: The quality of the evidence for patient-relevant outcomes following hinged knee arthroplasty was limited. While there is the potential for high early revision rates, where successful, large functional benefits may be achieved.
Abstract
Background: With more complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures there is often the need to use more constrained prostheses. This study aims to investigate patient-relevant outcomes following primary and revision rotating-hinged total knee arthroplasty. Methods: Electronic searches were performed using four databases from their date of inception to January 2021. Relevant studies were identified, with data extracted and analysed using PRIMSA guidelines. Results: Nineteen studies were included, producing a cohort of 568 primary and 413 revision rotating hinge total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Survival was assessed at 1-, 5-, and 10-year post-implantation. Sensitivity analyses based on person-time incidence ratios (PTIRs) were prespecified for studies not reporting survival at these timepoints. From the primary hinge TKA cohort, the median survival at 1 year was 93.4% and at 10 years it was 87%. The PTIR at long-term follow-up of this primary cohort was 1.07 (95% CI 0.4–1.7) per 100 person-years. From the revision hinge TKA cohort, the median survival at 1 year was 79.6%, and at 10 years it was 65.1%. The PTIR at long term-follow-up of this revision cohort was 1.55 (95% CI 0.9–2.3) per 100 person-years. Post-operative flexion range of motion (ROM) was 110° for primary hinge TKA and 103° for revision hinge TKA. Compared with baseline, the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) improved for both groups post-operatively (primary: KSS 17 to 86, KSFS 28 to 58; revision: KSS 37 to 82, KSFS 34 to 61). Conclusion: The quality of the evidence for patient-relevant outcomes following hinged knee arthroplasty was limited. While there is the potential for high early revision rates, where successful, large functional benefits may be achieved.
참고문헌 (40)
- Price AJ, "Knee replacement", Lancet, 392, pp.1672~1682 (2018)
- Kurtz S, "Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 89, pp.780~785 (2007)
- NJR, "National Joint Registry for England Wales Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man", ~ (2020)
- Scuderi GR, "Revision total knee arthroplasty : how much constraint is enough?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 392, pp.300~305 (2001)
- Hampton CB, "Aseptic loosening at the tibia in total knee arthroplasty: a function of cement mantle quality?", J Arthroplasty, 35, pp.S190~S196 (2020)
- Pasquier G, "The role of rotating hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty", EFORT Open Rev, 4, pp.269~278 (2019)
- Rodriguez-Merchan EC, "Total knee arthroplasty using hinge joints : Indications and results", EFORT Open Rev, 4, pp.121~132 (2019)
- Gehrke T, "The role of hinges in primary total knee replacement", Bone Jt J, 96, pp.93~95 (2014)
- Wilson HA, "Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement : systematic review and meta-analysis", BMJ, 364, pp.352~ (2019)
- Cuckler JM, "Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is necessary?", Orthopedics, 18(932–3), pp.6~ (1995)
- Makaram N, "Survival of the low contact stress rotating platform total knee replacement is influenced by age : 1058 implants with a minimum follow-up of 10 years", Knee, 25, pp.1283~1291 (2018)
- Campbell M, "Synthesis without metaanalysis(SWiM)in systematic reviews : reporting guideline", BMJ, 368, pp.6890~ (2020)
- Wylde V, "Post-operative patient-related risk factors for chronic pain after total knee replacement : a systematic review", BMJ Open, 7, pp.e018105~ (2017)
- Rodriguez-Merchan EC, "Revision knee arthroplasty with a rotating-hinge design in elderly patients with instability following total knee arthroplasty", J Clin Orthop Trauma, 6, pp.19~23 (2015)
- Neumann DR, "Follow-up of a modular rotating hinge knee system in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 27, pp.814~819 (2012)
- Gudnason A, "Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty : a minimum 6-year follow-up", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 131, pp.1~7 (2011)
- Pradhan NR, "Salvage revision total knee replacement using the endo-model rotating hinge prosthesis", Knee, 11, pp.469~473 (2004)
- Bistolfi A, "Endo-modell rotatinghinge total knee for revision total knee arthroplasty", Orthopedics, 36, pp.e1299~e1306 (2013)
- Barrack RL, "The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 15, pp.858~ (2000)
- Back DL, "The SMILES prosthesis in salvage revision knee surgery", Knee, 15, pp.40~44 (2008)
- Bistolfi A, "Rotating-hinge total knee for revision total knee arthroplasty", Orthopedics, 35, pp.e325~e330 (2012)
- Joshi N, "Is there a place for rotating-hinge arthroplasty in knee revision surgery for aseptic loosening?", J Arthroplasty, 23, pp.1204~1211 (2008)
- Pour AE, "Rotating hinged total knee replacement : use with caution", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 89, pp.1735~1741 (2007)
- Rahman J, "Custom rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in patients with poliomyelitis affected limbs", Int Orthop, 39, pp.833~838 (2015)
- Lozano LM, "Better outcomes in severe and morbid obese patients(BMI > 35 kg", m2)in primary Endo-Model rotatinghinge total knee arthroplasty, 2012, pp.2012, 249391~
- Kowalczewski J, "Primary rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty : good outcomes at mid-term follow-up", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.1202~1206 (2014)
- Yang JH, "Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20, pp.517~523 (2012)
- Petrou G, "Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7-to 15-year follow-up", J Bone Jt Surg B, 86, pp.813~817 (2004)
- Bistolfi A, "Results with 98 endo-modell rotating hinge prostheses for primary knee arthroplasty", Orthopedics, 36, pp.e746~e752 (2013)
- Leng Y, "Primary total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely compromised knees", Int J Clin Exp Med, 11, pp.5867~5872 (2018)
- Baier C, "Assessing patient-oriented results after revision total knee arthroplasty", J Orthop Sci, 18, pp.955~961 (2013)
- Abdelaziz H, "Clinical survivorship of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty using hinged knees and tantalum cones at minimum 10-year follow-up", J Arthroplasty, 34, pp.3018~3022 (2019)
- 2019 Annual Report, "German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD)", ~ (2019)
- Finnish Arthroplasty Registry, "ENDOnet", Finnish Arthroplasty Registry, ~ (2020)
- 17th Annual Report, "National Joint Registry (NJR)", ~ (2020)
- Crowson CS, "Living with survival analysis in orthopedics", J Arthroplasty, 36, pp.3358~3361 (2021)
- Annual Report 2020: Hip, Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty, "AOA Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry", ~
- Sabah SA, "Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty", Bone Jt J, 103-B, pp.627~634 (2021)
- Deere K, "How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry", Lancet Rheumatol, 3, pp.e438~e446 (2021)
- Hommel H, "Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty : study protocol of a randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of level of constraint on postoperative outcome", BMJ Open, 7, pp.e012964~ (2017)