본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The current utilization of the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) in isolated or combined total knee arthroplasty populations

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for clinical research and patient-centric care because they allow us to capture patient perspectives on their health condition. In knee arthroplasty, PROMs are frequently used to assess the risks and benefits of new interventions, surgical approaches, and other management strategies. A few examples of PROMs used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (collectively referred to as “legacy” PROMs). More recently, attention has been brought to another PROM called the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS was developed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and has over 300 domains assessing various aspects of patient health, including pain, physical function, and mental health. With the use of PROMIS increasing in TKA literature, there is a need to review the advancements being made in understanding and applying PROMIS for this population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to provide insight on the utilization, advantages, and disadvantages of PROMIS within the field of knee arthroplasty and to provide a comparison to legacy PROMs.

Abstract

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for clinical research and patient-centric care because they allow us to capture patient perspectives on their health condition. In knee arthroplasty, PROMs are frequently used to assess the risks and benefits of new interventions, surgical approaches, and other management strategies. A few examples of PROMs used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (collectively referred to as “legacy” PROMs). More recently, attention has been brought to another PROM called the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS was developed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and has over 300 domains assessing various aspects of patient health, including pain, physical function, and mental health. With the use of PROMIS increasing in TKA literature, there is a need to review the advancements being made in understanding and applying PROMIS for this population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to provide insight on the utilization, advantages, and disadvantages of PROMIS within the field of knee arthroplasty and to provide a comparison to legacy PROMs.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Gagnier JJ, "Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics", J Orthop Res, 35, pp.2098~2108 (2017)[DOI]
  2. Weldring T, "Patient-reported outcomes(PROs)and patient-reported outcome measures(PROMs)", Health Serv Insights, 6, pp.61~68 (2013)[DOI]
  3. Ahern S, "Collecting patient-reported outcome measures", Intern Med J, 47, pp.1454~1457 (2017)[DOI]
  4. Kluzek S, "Patient-reported outcome measures(PROMs)as proof of treatment efficacy", BMJ Evid-Based Med (2021)[DOI]
  5. Perez JL, "Readability of orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures : is there a fundamental failure to communicate?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 475, pp.1936~1947 (2017)[DOI]
  6. Canfield M, "Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty : defining the optimal collection window", Arthroplast Today, 6, pp.62~67 (2020)[DOI]
  7. "What is PROMIS?"[URL]
  8. "HealthMeasures intro to PROMIS"[URL]
  9. "National institutes of health patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS)"[URL]
  10. Browning RB, "Patients require less time to complete preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system(PROMIS)than legacy patient-reported outcome measures", Arthrosc Sport Med Rehabil, 3, pp.e1413~e1419 (2021)[DOI]
  11. Gulledge CM, "Floor and ceiling effects, time to completion, and question burden of PROMIS CAT domains among shoulder and knee patients undergoing nonoperative and operative treatment", JBJS Open Access (2019)[DOI]
  12. Iyer S, "A prospective, psychometric validation of national institutes of health patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function, pain interference, and upper extremity computer adaptive testing in cervical spine patients : successes and key limitations", Spine, 44, pp.1539~1549 (2019)[DOI]
  13. Tyser AR, "Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity", J Hand Surg Am, 39, pp.2047~2051.e4 (2014)[DOI]
  14. Hung M, "Validation of PROMIS ® physical function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.3466~3474 (2013)[DOI]
  15. Fliege H, "Development of a computeradaptive test for depression(D-CAT)", Qual Life Res, 14, pp.2277~2291 (2005)[DOI]
  16. Seo DG, "Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing", certification examinations, 2017, pp.14, 17~
  17. Lizzio VA, "Feasibility of PROMIS CAT administration in the ambulatory sports medicine clinic with respect to cost and patient compliance : a single-surgeon experience", Orthop J Sport Med, 7 (2019)[DOI]
  18. Khalil LS, "Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system(PROMIS)global health short forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplast, 35, pp.1540~1544 (2020)[DOI]
  19. Padilla JA, "Relationship between the patient-reported outcome measurement information system and traditional patient-reported outcomes for osteoarthritis", J Arthroplast, 34, pp.265~272 (2019)[DOI]
  20. Heng M, "Can the knee outcome and osteoarthritis score (KOOS) function subscale be linked to the PROMIS physical function to crosswalk equivalent scores?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 479, pp.2653~2664 (2021)[DOI]
  21. Tang X, "Linking the KOOS-PS to PROMIS physical function in knee patients evaluated for surgery", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 30, pp.281~289 (2022)[DOI]
  22. Austin DC, "A one-question patientreported outcome measure is comparable to multiple-question measures in total knee arthroplasty patients", J Arthroplast, 34, pp.2937~2943 (2019)[DOI]
  23. Shim J, "Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 global health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty", Bone Joint J, 101-B, pp.832~837 (2019)[DOI]
  24. Givens DL, "Timed up and go test is predictive of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty", Arthroplast today, 4, pp.505~509 (2018)[DOI]
  25. Lawrie CM, "Is the patient-reported outcome measurement information system feasible in bundled payment for care improvement total knee arthroplasty patients?", J Arthroplast, 36, pp.6~12 (2021)[DOI]
  26. Kortlever JTP, "PROMIS physical function correlates with KOOS, JR in patients with knee pain", J Knee Surg, 33, pp.903~911 (2020)[DOI]
  27. Ingall E, "Impact of preoperative opioid use on patient-reported outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty : a propensity matched analysis", J Knee Surg (2021)[DOI]
  28. Klemt C, "Single-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved functional outcomes : a propensity score-matched cohort study", J Arthroplast, 36, pp.298~304 (2021)[DOI]
  29. Kagan R, "The recovery curve for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system patient-reported physical function and pain interference computerized adaptive tests after primary total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplast, 33, pp.2471~2474 (2018)[DOI]
  30. Christensen J, "Physical activity, pain interference and comorbidities relate to PROMIS physical function in younger adults following total knee arthroplasty", Disabil Rehabil, 43, pp.3741~3747 (2021)[DOI]
  31. Darrith B, "Preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system global health scores predict patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference in the early postoperative time period after total knee arthroplasty", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 29, pp.e1417~e1426 (2021)[DOI]
  32. Hung M, "Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function : the HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT", J Orthop Res, 36, pp.1178~1184 (2018)[DOI]
  33. Horn ME, "Can patient-reported outcome measurement information system measures differentiate patients who will undergo hip and knee total joint arthroplasty : a retrospective case–control study", J Arthroplast (2022)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in knee arthroplasty patients: a systematic review of the literatureAlexander L. Neuwirth, David P. Trofa, Natalia Czerwonka, Puneet Gupta, Sohil S. Desai, Thomas R. Hickernell대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2023 · 제35권 Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee ArthroplastyHo Jong Ra, Young-Joon Choi대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2016 · 제28권 제1호Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient‑acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty: a systematic reviewAndreas Bell, Filippo Migliorini, Francesco Simeone, Luise Schäfer, Nicola Maffulli, Ulf Krister Hofmann대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2024 · 제36권 Serial changes in patient‑reported outcome measures and satisfaction rate during long‑term follow‑up after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta‑analysisDarryl D. D’Lima, Hyuk-Soo Han, Hyunkwon Kim, Jisu Park, Moon Jong Chang, Tae Woo Kim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2024 · 제36권 Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed valuesChatte Manish, Kim Tae Kyun, Kim Woo Hyun, Maredupaka Siddhartha, Meshram Prashant대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2020 · 제32권 Patients Still Wish for Key Improvements after Total Knee Arthroplasty김태균, Ankur Bamne, Seok Jin Kim, Yeon Gwi Kang, Young Dong Song대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2015 · 제27권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)