Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction: a cohort study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Research on factors influencing the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is relatively scarce and mostly relies even on reports from a single group. Understanding the factors contributing to the failure of revision ACL reconstruction can provide valuable information for achieving better clinical outcomes and assist in patient counseling before surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the factors contributing to surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction. Methods: The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent single-bundle revision ACL reconstruction using the transportal technique between 2010 and 2020 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were classified into 2 groups based on the presence of surgical failure during the follow-up period (group NF, patients who did not experience surgical failure; group F, patients who experienced surgical failure). In this study, surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction was defined as meeting any of the following conditions during follow-up: the presence of graft re-tear confirmed by MRI, anterior-posterior laxity graded ≥2, or rotational laxity graded ≥2. A comparative analysis was conducted on demographic data, as well as pre-, intra-, and postoperative data between the groups. Additionally, a regression analysis was performed to investigate factors influencing surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction. Results: A total of 58 patients were included (group NF, 40 patients; group F, 18 patients). In between-group comparisons of demographic, peri-, and intra-operative data, group F exhibited a higher frequency of multiple revision surgeries (P = 0.001), increased preoperative osteoarthritis grade (P = 0.001), and shallower femoral tunnel depth (P = 0.002) compared to group NF. At the final follow-up, group F demonstrated relatively poor clinical outcomes, both subjectively and objectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that all variables that showed differences in the preceding comparisons were independent factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction. Conclusion: Surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction can occur in a substantial number of patients, influenced by non-modifiable factors such as cases corresponding to multiple revision surgery and preoperative osteoarthritis grade and modifiable factors like femoral tunnel depth.
Abstract
Background: Research on factors influencing the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is relatively scarce and mostly relies even on reports from a single group. Understanding the factors contributing to the failure of revision ACL reconstruction can provide valuable information for achieving better clinical outcomes and assist in patient counseling before surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the factors contributing to surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction. Methods: The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent single-bundle revision ACL reconstruction using the transportal technique between 2010 and 2020 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were classified into 2 groups based on the presence of surgical failure during the follow-up period (group NF, patients who did not experience surgical failure; group F, patients who experienced surgical failure). In this study, surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction was defined as meeting any of the following conditions during follow-up: the presence of graft re-tear confirmed by MRI, anterior-posterior laxity graded ≥2, or rotational laxity graded ≥2. A comparative analysis was conducted on demographic data, as well as pre-, intra-, and postoperative data between the groups. Additionally, a regression analysis was performed to investigate factors influencing surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction. Results: A total of 58 patients were included (group NF, 40 patients; group F, 18 patients). In between-group comparisons of demographic, peri-, and intra-operative data, group F exhibited a higher frequency of multiple revision surgeries (P = 0.001), increased preoperative osteoarthritis grade (P = 0.001), and shallower femoral tunnel depth (P = 0.002) compared to group NF. At the final follow-up, group F demonstrated relatively poor clinical outcomes, both subjectively and objectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that all variables that showed differences in the preceding comparisons were independent factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction. Conclusion: Surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction can occur in a substantial number of patients, influenced by non-modifiable factors such as cases corresponding to multiple revision surgery and preoperative osteoarthritis grade and modifiable factors like femoral tunnel depth.
참고문헌 (45)
- Tischer T, "Time to focus on ACL revision : ESSKA 2022 consensus", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 31, pp.4637~4638 (2023)
- Tuca M, "Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament surgery", Worldwide Benchmark Stud J Isakos, 8, pp.2~10 (2023)
- Grassi A, "What is the mid-term failure rate of revision ACL reconstruction? a systematic review", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 475, pp.2484~2499 (2017)
- Li X, "Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int Orthop, 47, pp.719~734 (2023)
- Hettrich CM, "The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : two-and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.1534~1540 (2013)
- Lind M, "Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions", Am J Sports Med, 40, pp.1551~1557 (2012)
- Leroux T, "The epidemiology of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Ontario, Canada", Am J Sports Med, 42, pp.2666~2672 (2014)
- Mohan R, "Clinical outcomes in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a meta-analysis", Arthroscopy, 34, pp.289~300 (2018)
- Grassi A, "Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results", Br J Sports Med, 50, pp.716~724 (2016)
- Wright RW, "Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes at a minimum of 5-year follow-up : a systematic review", J Knee Surg, 32, pp.218~221 (2019)
- Wright RW, "Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a systematic review", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94, pp.531~536 (2012)
- Kamath GV, "Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 39, pp.199~217 (2011)
- Matassi F, "Controversies in ACL revision surgery : Italian expert group consensus and state of the art", J Orthop Traumatol, 23, pp.32~ (2022)
- MARS, "Meniscal and articular cartilage predictors of clinical outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 44, pp.1671~1679 (2016)
- Liechti DJ, "Outcomes and risk factors of rerevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a systematic review", Arthroscopy, 32, pp.2151~2159 (2016)
- Kraeutler MJ, "Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 99, pp.1689~1696 (2017)
- Tapasvi S, "Revision ACL reconstruction : principles and practice", Ind J Orthop, 55, pp.263~275 (2021)
- Chen JL, "Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single-and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions : a MARS cohort study", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.1571~1578 (2013)
- Wyatt RW, "Prevalence and incidence of cartilage injuries and meniscus tears in patients who underwent both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions", Am J Sports Med, 42, pp.1841~1846 (2014)
- Roethke LC, "Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACLR) : causes and how to minimize primary ACLR failure", Arch Bone Jt Surg, 11, pp.80~93 (2023)
- Koga H, "Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery : state of the art", J ISAKOS, 2, pp.36~46 (2017)
- Moon HS, "Graft isometry during anatomical ACL reconstruction has little effect on surgical outcomes", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 30, pp.1594~1604 (2022)
- Moon HS, "The graft insertion length in the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with suspensory fixation and tibialis anterior allograft does not affect surgical outcomes but is negatively correlated with tunnel widening", Arthroscopy, 37, pp.2903~2914 (2021)
- Irrgang JJ, "Responsiveness of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form", Am J Sports Med, 34, pp.1567~1573 (2006)
- Briggs KK, "The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee : 25 years later", Am J Sports Med, 37, pp.890~897 (2009)
- Myrer JW, "Relative and absolute reliability of the KT-2000 arthrometer for uninjured knees. Testing at 67, 89, 134, and 178 N and manual maximum forces", Am J Sports Med, 24, pp.104~108 (1996)
- Weng CJ, "Clinical and functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon in patients aged 50 years or older", Arthroscopy, 36, pp.558~562 (2020)
- Harris JD, "Research pearls : the significance of statistics and perils of pooling Part 1 clinical versus statistical significance", Arthroscopy, 33, pp.1102~1112 (2017)
- Tischer T, "Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults : the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND", UCLA appropriateness method, 2023, pp.31, 4662~4672
- Pfeiffer TR, "An increased lateral femoral condyle ratio is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 100, pp.857~864 (2018)
- Moon HS, "Medial meniscal posterior horn tears are associated with increased posterior tibial slope : a case-control study", Am J Sports Med, 48, pp.1702~1710 (2020)
- Moon HS, "Do rotation and measurement methods affect reliability of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position on 3d reconstructed computed tomography?", Orthop J Sports Med, 7, pp.2325967119885882~ (2019)
- Iriuchishima T, "Truncated-pyramid shape simulation for the measurement of femoral intercondylar notch volume can detect the volume difference between ACL-injured and intact subjects", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 29, pp.1709~1713 (2021)
- Moon H-S, "Small intercondylar notch size is not associated with poor surgical outcomes of anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions", Clin Orthop Surg, 16, pp.73~85 (2024)
- Bae BS, "Ramp lesion in anterior cruciate ligament injury : a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, epidemiology, and diagnosis", Knee Surg Relat Res, 35, pp.23~ (2023)
- Yoon KH, "A Comparison of results in older, middle-aged, and younger patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : minimum 10-year follow-up", Clin Orthop Surg, 1, pp.15~ (2023)
- Yao S, "Tackling the challenges of graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-thinking from the endpoint", Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9, pp.756930~ (2021)
- Shelbourne KD, "Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations", Am J Sports Med, 28, pp.446~452 (2000)
- Wright RW, "Osteoarthritis classification scales : interobserver reliability and arthroscopic correlation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 96, pp.1145~1151 (2014)
- Shi WL, "Femoral tunnel malposition, increased lateral tibial slope, and decreased notch width index are risk factors for non-traumatic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure", Arthroscopy (2023)[DOI]
- Morgan JA, "Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction", J Knee Surg, 25, pp.361~368 (2012)
- Byrne KJ, "Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 30, pp.1388~1395 (2022)
- Bait C, "Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 27, pp.1873~1881 (2019)
- Grassi A, "Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? a meta-analysis of 32 studies", Bone Joint J, 99, pp.714~723 (2017)
- Wright RW, "Association between graft choice and 6-year outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the MARS cohort", Am J Sports Med, 49, pp.2589~2598 (2021)