부정산출요소를 고려한 중국 경제권의 효율성 평가
Efficiency Evaluation of Economic Zones in China Considering the Undesirable Output
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the development of China, air pollutants are also growing rapidly in recent decades, especially in big cities of the country. To better understand the relationship between economic conditions and air pollutants in big cities, this study combined the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of 17 provinces in China’s four key economic development zones (the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the Bohai Economic Rim, the Pearl River Delta, and the Yangtze River Delta) for the first time and explored the decoupling of economic growth from CO2 emissions. To achieve the research purpose, this paper constructs an economic benefit evaluation index system with employees, fixed investments, main energy productions as inputs, and gross domestic product (GDP) as output. In addition, the trend of economic efficiency changed from 2016 to 2020 was analyzed and compared by combining CO2 emissions and set as undesirable output based on slacks-based measure (SBM) model and undesirable output model. The results show that from the perspective of provincial economic efficiency, the economic efficiency considering the undesirable output is lower than the traditional economic efficiency from 2016 to 2020. In terms of regional economic efficiency, the Bohai Economic Rim (BER) and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (BTHR) are the most economically efficient of the four economic development zones (EDZs). Additionally, the mean value of regional green economic efficiency, in descending order, is the BER, the BTHR, the Pearl River Delta (PRD), and the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). In general, it is suggested that the government set different CO2 emission reductiontargets for different areas in order to achieve rapid economic growth, taking into consideration the disparities in industrial structure and economic development levels of different EDZs.
Abstract
With the development of China, air pollutants are also growing rapidly in recent decades, especially in big cities of the country. To better understand the relationship between economic conditions and air pollutants in big cities, this study combined the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of 17 provinces in China’s four key economic development zones (the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the Bohai Economic Rim, the Pearl River Delta, and the Yangtze River Delta) for the first time and explored the decoupling of economic growth from CO2 emissions. To achieve the research purpose, this paper constructs an economic benefit evaluation index system with employees, fixed investments, main energy productions as inputs, and gross domestic product (GDP) as output. In addition, the trend of economic efficiency changed from 2016 to 2020 was analyzed and compared by combining CO2 emissions and set as undesirable output based on slacks-based measure (SBM) model and undesirable output model. The results show that from the perspective of provincial economic efficiency, the economic efficiency considering the undesirable output is lower than the traditional economic efficiency from 2016 to 2020. In terms of regional economic efficiency, the Bohai Economic Rim (BER) and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (BTHR) are the most economically efficient of the four economic development zones (EDZs). Additionally, the mean value of regional green economic efficiency, in descending order, is the BER, the BTHR, the Pearl River Delta (PRD), and the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). In general, it is suggested that the government set different CO2 emission reductiontargets for different areas in order to achieve rapid economic growth, taking into consideration the disparities in industrial structure and economic development levels of different EDZs.
참고문헌 (46)
- Nazarko, J., "Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions", Technological and Economic development of Economy, 20(1), pp.25~44 (2014)
- "Economist", 2010, 46~54
- Yin, J., "Study on urban efficiency measurement and spatiotemporal evolution of cities in Northwest China based on the DEA–malmquist model", Sustainability, 11(2), pp.434~ (2019)
- Tao, X., "Provincial green economic efficiency of China : A non-separable input –output SBM approach", Applied energy, 171, pp.58~66 (2016)
- Martić, M., "An application of DEA for comparative analysis and ranking of regions in Serbia with regards to social-economic development", European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), pp.343~356 (2001)
- Shuai, S., "Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China : Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model", Journal of Environmental Management, 261, pp.110227~ (2020)
- Hu, J. L., "Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China", Energy policy, 34(17), pp.3206~3217 (2006)
- Hu, J. L., "Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies", Energy policy, 35(1), pp.373~382 (2007)
- Wei, Y. M., "An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel sector", Energy, 32(12), pp.2262~2270 (2007)
- Hu, J. L., "Efficient three industrial waste abatement for regions in China", The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 15(2), pp.132~144 (2008)
- Zhou, P., "Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance", Energy Policy, 36(8), pp.2911~2916 (2008)
- Zhou, P., "Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies", Energy Economics, 30(1), pp.1~14 (2008)
- Bian, Y., "Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China : A DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy", Energy Policy, 38(4), pp.1909~1917 (2010)
- Shi, G. M., "Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs", Energy policy, 38(10), pp.6172~6179 (2010)
- Yeh, T. L., "A comparative study of energy utilization efficiency between Taiwan and China", Energy policy, 38(5), pp.2386~2394 (2010)
- Zhou, P., "Total factor carbon emission performance : a Malmquist index analysis", Energy Economics, 32(1), pp.194~201 (2010)
- Guo, X. D., "Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA", Energy Policy, 39(5), pp.2352~2360 (2011)
- Zhang, X. P., "Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries", Energy Policy, 39(2), pp.644~650 (2011)
- Wu, F., "Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China : A nonparametric analysis", Energy Policy, 49, pp.164~172 (2012)
- Li, Y., "How to reduce energy intensity in China : A regional comparison perspective", Energy Policy, 61, pp.513~522 (2013)
- Pan, H., "China’s provincial industrial energy efficiency and its determinants", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5-6), pp.1032~1039 (2013)
- Wang, K., "Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions : a multi-directional efficiency analysis", Applied Energy, 104, pp.105~116 (2013)
- Wang, K., "Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020", Energy Policy, 54, pp.214~229 (2013)
- Banker, R. D., "A note on returns to scale in DEA", European journal of operational research, 88(3), pp.583~585 (1996)
- Ahn, T., "Efficiency characterizations in different DEA models", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 22(6), pp.253~257 (1988)
- Charnes, A., "Data envelopment analysis theory, methodology and applications", Journal of the Operational Research society, 48(3), pp.332~333 (1997)
- Cooper, W. W., "Handbook on data envelopment analysis", pp.1~39 (2011), Springer
- Tone, K., "Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach", Omega, 38(3-4), pp.145~156 (2010)
- Tone, K., "Dynamic DEA with network structure : A slacks-based measure approach", Omega, 42(1), pp.124~131 (2014)
- A hybrid measure of efficiency in DEA, "Tone, K.", GRIPS, ~ (2004)
- Cooper, W. W., "Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA: some recent developments", Journal of productivity analysis, 15, pp.217~246 (2001)
- Pestana Barros, C., "The Measurement of efficiency of Portuguese Sea Port Authorities with DEA", pp.1000~1020 (2003)
- Jemric, I., "Efficiency of banks in Croatia : A DEA approach", Comparative Economic Studies, 44(2), pp.169~193 (2002)
- Vincova, K., "Using DEA models to measure efficiency", Biatec, 13(8), pp.24~28 (2005)
- Tone, K., "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis", European journal of operational research, 130(3), pp.498~509 (2001)
- Wu, H., "How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency : Evidence from China", Energy Economics, 91, pp.104880~ (2020)
- Chen, J., "Stochastic frontier analysis of productive efficiency in China’s Forestry Industry", Journal of Forest Economics, 28, pp.87~95 (2017)
- Liu, Y., "Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency : The case of Yangtze river economic belt in China", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, pp.119993~ (2020)
- Liu, D., "Analysis of China’s coastal zone management reform based on land-sea integration", Marine Economics and Management (2019)
- Vincova, K., "Using DEA models to measure efficiency", Biatec, 13(8), pp.24~28 (2005)
- Geys, B., "Measuring local government technical(in)efficiency : an application and comparison of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches", Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), pp.499~513 (2009)
- Sala-Garrido, R., "Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model", Chemical Engineering Journal, 173(3), pp.766~772 (2011)
- Kočišová, K., "Application of the DEA on the measurement of efficiency in the EU countries", Agricultural Economics, 61(2), pp.51~62 (2015)
- 왕관, "Evaluating Performance and Efficiency of Logistics in Chinese Provinces and Cities along the Belt and Road Initiative", 로지스틱스연구, 28(3), pp.13~26 (2020), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
- 임병학, "컨테이너항만 네트워크가 항만 생산성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구: 사회 네트워크 분석을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 19(3), pp.19~35 (2011), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
- 박차미, "DEA-SBM을 이용한 국내 물류산업의 효율성 분석", 로지스틱스연구, 22(4), pp.27~46 (2014), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]