부산물을 이용한 꽃게 통발용 미끼의 유인 효과
Attracting effect of baits used the by-product for swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus pots
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In order to develop the substitutive materials for natural baits of swimming crab pots, the attracting effects of swimming crab such as the preference of baits which were made of the by-products of marine and stock raising through the water tank experiments and fishing experiments. On the investigation of mean entrapped catch number to the pot by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), mackerel with grinded mackerel's internals(MMI), mackerel with tuna's internals(MTI) and makerel with grinded krill(MK) each in one pot by turns, MMI and MK were entrapped mean 3.9(13.0%) and they were a little more comparing to M, and MTI is least with mean 2.1(7.0%)(F=12.913, P<0.05). Otherwise, on the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits in the 4 pots each, M was entrapped mean 3.0(10%), but MMI, MTI and MK were mean 1.2(4.0%), 1.0(3.3%) and 1.5(5.0%) each and they were only 30-50% of M(F=13.398, P<0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the 5 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), and krill(K), manila clam(MC), pig's fat(PF) and chicken's head(CH) which were used in substitutive baits, M was entrapped mean 3.2(10.7%), but K was about 50% of catch of M with mean 1.6(5.3%), and MC, PF and CH were very few with mean 0.1-0.2(0.3-0.7%)(F=89.186, P<0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the pots which were put each the 3 kinds of baits, original krill(K), grinded krill with gluten and soybean oil cake(KGGS) and grinded krill with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine(KGGSGL) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cages(BF), and which were put the mackerel(M) in the non-fluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage(RFN), it was entrapped mean 3.0(10.0%) in the pot which was put the mackerel in the RFN, and the same level in the pots which were put the K and KGGSGL in the BF, but it was mean 2.0(6.7%) in the pots which was put the KGGS in BF and it was decreased by 30% of catch comparing to RFN(F=3.750, P<0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crab by the pots which was put grinded tuna with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine(TIGSGL) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cage(BF), and which was put mackerel(M) in the non-fluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage(RFN), it was entrapped mean 3.3(11.0%) in the pot which was put mackerel in RFn, and mean 2.7(9.0%) in the pot which was put TIGSGL in BF and it was about 15% less comparing to use bait M(t=1.387, P>0.05). As a results of fishing experiments, a plan for enhancing catching efficiency of TIGSGL will be required because catching efficiency of TIGSGL, alternative bait, was half of fish catching efficiency of natural bait using mackerel. Fishing experiments were conducted 3 times using reinforced substitutive artificial bait that is reinforced attractive effect of TIGSGL and composed of tuna intestine, grinded mackerel, gluten, soybean cake, glycine and alanine(TIMGGSGLA). Catching efficiency of TIMGGSGLA was about 80% of that of natural bait made of mackerel.
Abstract
In order to develop the substitutive materials for natural baits of swimming crab pots, the attracting effects of swimming crab such as the preference of baits which were made of the by-products of marine and stock raising through the water tank experiments and fishing experiments. On the investigation of mean entrapped catch number to the pot by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), mackerel with grinded mackerel's internals(MMI), mackerel with tuna's internals(MTI) and makerel with grinded krill(MK) each in one pot by turns, MMI and MK were entrapped mean 3.9(13.0%) and they were a little more comparing to M, and MTI is least with mean 2.1(7.0%)(F=12.913, P<0.05). Otherwise, on the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits in the 4 pots each, M was entrapped mean 3.0(10%), but MMI, MTI and MK were mean 1.2(4.0%), 1.0(3.3%) and 1.5(5.0%) each and they were only 30-50% of M(F=13.398, P<0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the 5 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), and krill(K), manila clam(MC), pig's fat(PF) and chicken's head(CH) which were used in substitutive baits, M was entrapped mean 3.2(10.7%), but K was about 50% of catch of M with mean 1.6(5.3%), and MC, PF and CH were very few with mean 0.1-0.2(0.3-0.7%)(F=89.186, P<0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the pots which were put each the 3 kinds of baits, original krill(K), grinded krill with gluten and soybean oil cake(KGGS) and grinded krill with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine(KGGSGL) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cages(BF), and which were put the mackerel(M) in the non-fluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage(RFN), it was entrapped mean 3.0(10.0%) in the pot which was put the mackerel in the RFN, and the same level in the pots which were put the K and KGGSGL in the BF, but it was mean 2.0(6.7%) in the pots which was put the KGGS in BF and it was decreased by 30% of catch comparing to RFN(F=3.750, P<0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crab by the pots which was put grinded tuna with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine(TIGSGL) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cage(BF), and which was put mackerel(M) in the non-fluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage(RFN), it was entrapped mean 3.3(11.0%) in the pot which was put mackerel in RFn, and mean 2.7(9.0%) in the pot which was put TIGSGL in BF and it was about 15% less comparing to use bait M(t=1.387, P>0.05). As a results of fishing experiments, a plan for enhancing catching efficiency of TIGSGL will be required because catching efficiency of TIGSGL, alternative bait, was half of fish catching efficiency of natural bait using mackerel. Fishing experiments were conducted 3 times using reinforced substitutive artificial bait that is reinforced attractive effect of TIGSGL and composed of tuna intestine, grinded mackerel, gluten, soybean cake, glycine and alanine(TIMGGSGLA). Catching efficiency of TIMGGSGLA was about 80% of that of natural bait made of mackerel.
참고문헌 (25)
- An, Y.I., "Development of artificial bait for octopus drift line", Jour. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech, 43(4), pp.291~300 (2007)
- Archdale, M.V., "Catch of swimming crabs using fish mince in teabags compared to conventional fish baits in collapsible pots", Fish. Res, 91, pp.291~298 (2008)
- Beukemaj, J.J., "Acquired hook avoidance in the pike Esox lucius L. fished with artificial and natural baits", Jour. Fish Bio, 2, pp.155~160 (1970)
- Carr, W.E.S., "Chemically stimulated feeding behavior in marine animals", J. Chem. Ecol, 12, pp.989~1011 (1986)
- Carr, W.E.S., "Adenosine 5 monophoshpate, an internal regulatory agent, is a potent chemoattractant for a marine shrimp", J. Comp. Phsiol, 153, pp.47~53 (1983)
- Chang, H.Y., "Analysis on the present business states of coastal and off shore fisheries by type of fishery", Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu, 15(2), pp.166~175 (2003)
- Chang, H.Y., "Attracting effect of baits used in trap for swimming crab.", Jour. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech, 43(4), pp.301~309 (2007)
- Chang, H.Y., "Fluorescent characteristics of baits and bait cages for swimming crab Protunus trituberculatus pots", Jour. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech, 44(3), pp.174~183 (2008)
- Fuwa, S., "The efficiency of the processed bait for longline made by the leftovers of squid", Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 66(5), pp.888~889 (2000)
- Hara, J.J., "Chemoreception in Fishes", pp.433~ (1982), Elsevier Sci
- Harada, K., "Feeding attraction activities of nucleic acid related compounds for abalone, oriental weather fish and yellowtail", Bull. Japanese Soc. Sci.Fish, 52(11), pp.1961~1968 (1986)
- Januma, S., "The application of processed bait for pelagic tuna longline made by liver of squid", Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 67(2), pp.313~314 (2001)
- Januma, S., "Development and comparative of squid liver artificial bait for tuna longline", Fish. Sci, 69, pp.288~292 (2003)
- Johnstone, A.D.F., "Laboratory investigations of bait acceptance by the cod, Gadus morthua L.: investigations of feeding stimulants", Fish. Res, 9, pp.219~230 (1990)
- Kawamura, G., "Effectiveness of a sugarcane fish combination as bait in trapping swimming crabs", Fish. Res, 22, pp.155~160 (1995)
- Kobayashi, H., "A study on the success of a fishery with artificial baits for tuna long lines", Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish, 41(2), pp.175~182 (1975)
- Lφkkeborg, S., "Fishing experiments with an alternative longline bait using surplus fish products", Fish. Res, 12, pp.43~56 (1991)
- Miyazaki, C., "Fishing efficiency of feed stuff containing chemical stimulant", Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab, 49, pp.99~103 (1967)
- Takaoka. O., "Identification of feeding stimulants for marbled rockfish", Bull. Japanese. Soc. Sci. Fish, 56(2), pp.345~351 (1990)
- Takeda, M., "Identification of feeding stimulants for juvenile eel.", Bull. Japanese. Soc. Sci. Fish, 50, pp.645~651 (1984)
- Umezu, T., "Behavioral response of fishes to chemical stimuli", Bull. Japanese Soc. Sci. Fish, 32(3), pp.352~376 (1966)
- Watanabe, T., "Trap catch of the red queen crab Chionoecetes japonicus when using conspecific crabs as trap bait", Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 71(4), pp.549~554 (2005)
- Yamaguchi, Y., "Effectiveness of artificial baits for obtaining higher hooking rate on bottom set long line fishing", Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish, 49(12), pp.1819~1824 (1983)
- Youm, M., "The improved artificial trap baits", Bull. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech, 34(2), pp.185~190 (1998)
- Zimmer Faust, "The relationship between chemoreception and foraging behavior in crustaceans", Limnol. Oceanogr, 34(7), pp.1367~1374 (1989)
