새우조망 어업에서 그리드와 윈도우 네트의 선택효과
A selective effect of grid and window net in the shrimp beam trawl fishery
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study aims at a selective effect of the Grid and Window net in the shrimp beam trawl. The experimental trawling of the Proto type, Grid type and Grid and Window net type was performed in a sea area of Geo–je and Tong–yeong from Mar, 2006 to Apr, 2010. The obtained results are as follows; Catch per unit area (Number) of the Proto type net and Grid type net were 0.18/㎡, 0.23/㎡, respectively. The Grid type demonstrated 2.4% lower bycatch rate than the proto type (6.6% vs 4.2%, respectively). In addition, in terms of total weight, the bycatch rate of Grid type was 7.6% lower than the proto type (50.2% vs 42.6%, respectively). In the comparison of shrimp catch, the Proto type demonstrated better haul outcome (0.02 case/㎡) than the Grid & Window type (0.02 case/㎡). The Grid & Window net type demonstrated 16.4% lower bycatch rate than the Proto type (32.2% vs 48.6%, respectively). In addition, in terms of total weight, the bycatch rate of Grid & Window net type was 8.3% lower than the Proto type (85.9% vs 94.2% respectively).
Abstract
The study aims at a selective effect of the Grid and Window net in the shrimp beam trawl. The experimental trawling of the Proto type, Grid type and Grid and Window net type was performed in a sea area of Geo–je and Tong–yeong from Mar, 2006 to Apr, 2010. The obtained results are as follows; Catch per unit area (Number) of the Proto type net and Grid type net were 0.18/㎡, 0.23/㎡, respectively. The Grid type demonstrated 2.4% lower bycatch rate than the proto type (6.6% vs 4.2%, respectively). In addition, in terms of total weight, the bycatch rate of Grid type was 7.6% lower than the proto type (50.2% vs 42.6%, respectively). In the comparison of shrimp catch, the Proto type demonstrated better haul outcome (0.02 case/㎡) than the Grid & Window type (0.02 case/㎡). The Grid & Window net type demonstrated 16.4% lower bycatch rate than the Proto type (32.2% vs 48.6%, respectively). In addition, in terms of total weight, the bycatch rate of Grid & Window net type was 8.3% lower than the Proto type (85.9% vs 94.2% respectively).
참고문헌 (10)
- Broadhurst MK, "Reducing the bycatch of juvenile fish (mulloway) in the Hawkesbury River prawn–trawl fishery using square– mesh panels in codends", Fish Res, 19, pp.321~331 (1994)
- Broadhurst MK, "Using composite square–mesh panels and the Nordmøre–grid to reduce bycatch in the Shark Bay prawn–trawl fishery, Western Australia", Fish Res, 58(3), pp.349~365 (2002)[DOI]
- Broadhurst MK, "Selectivity of conventional diamond and nove square–mesh codends in an Australian estuarine penaeid–trawl fishery", Fish Res, 67, pp.183~194 (2004)[DOI]
- Cha BJ, "Development of a bycatch reduction device (BRD) for shrimp beam trawl suing flexible materials", Iran J Fish Sci, 11(1), pp.89~104 (2012)
- Day G, "NPF operators make gains in bycatch reduction but problems remain!", Professional Fisherman, 23, pp.18~19 (2001)
- Depestele J, "Short–term surival of discarded target fish and non–target invertebrate species in the "eurocutter" beam trawl fishery of the southern North Sea", Fish Res, 154, pp.82~72 (2014)[DOI]
- Eayrs S, "Reducing bycatch in Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery", Asia–Pacific Fishing 97, Conference papers, pp.97~105 (1997), Baird Publications
- Fonseca P, "Using a modified Nordmore grid for by–catch reduction in the Portuguese crustacean–trawl fishery", Fish Res, 71, pp.223~239 (2005)[DOI]
- 장충식, "한국 연안해역 새우 조망어업의 어획량 분석", 한국어업기술학회지, 45(1), pp.1~13 (2009), 한국어업기술학회
- 장충식, "상하식과 그리드식 새우조망 어구의 전개성능과 선택성", 한국어업기술학회지, 50(3), pp.351~360 (2014), 한국어업기술학회[DOI]