본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인터넷 규제와 관할

Internet Regulation and Jurisdiction

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Traditionally, international jurisdiction was based mainly in geographical terms. As far as the Internet regulation is concerned, three types of jurisdiction are relevant: prescriptive jurisdiction, adjudicative jurisdiction, and enforcement jurisdiction. Prescriptive jurisdiction refers to the power to apply legal norms to conduct. Adjudicative jurisdiction means the power of courts and tribunals to resolve disputes. Enforcement jurisdiction is the power of the jurisdiction to enforce. The Internet will be regulated through the three types of the Internet jurisdiction. Generally speaking, the Internet jurisdiction tends to become synonymous with the international jurisdiction on the Internet, which is a type of adjudicative jurisdiction. This Article will distinguish adjudicative jurisdiction from prescriptive jurisdiction and enforcement jurisdiction. In terms of the prescriptive jurisdiction, the Article will explore Yahoo case. Technology places more of a challenge on applying traditional jurisdiction to the Internet, than on being a tool in Internet regulation. Existing law can not control the Internet, an inherently technological environment. In spite of the problems associated with traditional jurisdiction as a means of regulating the Internet, the Internet should be regulated. In this regard, the traditional jurisdiction methods must be amended to account for the unique nature of the Internet.

참고문헌 (77)

  1. 金容奭, "국제재판관할에서의 관련 재판적의 인정과 인터넷을 통한 불법행위의 결과발생지의 재판관할(2003. 9. 26. 선고 2003다29555판결)", 대법원판례해설, (47) (2004)
  2. 김상훈, "인터넷상 명예훼손에 의한 손해배상청구소송의 국제재판관할-불법행위 특별재판적과 관련하여-", 한림법학 FORUM, (16) (2005)
  3. 김용진, "지적재산권침해와 인터넷국제재판관할", 민사소송, 5 (2002), 한국사법행정학회
  4. 盧泰嶽, "사이버불법행위의 재판관할과 준거법", 국제사법연구, (8) (2003)
  5. 盧泰嶽, "인터넷 명예훼손행위와 國際裁判管轄(대상판결: 대법원 2003. 9.26.선고 2003다29555판결)", 民事裁判의 諸問題, 13 (2003)
  6. 노태악, "인터넷명예훼손행위와 국제재판관할(대상판결: 대법원 2003. 9. 26.선고 2003다29555판결)", 민사재판의제문제, 13 (2003), 한국사법행정학회
  7. 법무부, "국제사법해설", 법무부, ~ (2001)
  8. 법무부, "국제사법해설", 법무부, ~ (2001)
  9. 石光現, "國際私法 解說" (2003), 芝山
  10. 石光現, "國際私法과 國際訴訟" (2002), 博英社
  11. 石光現, "國際私法과 國際訴訟" (2004), 博英社
  12. 석광현, "국제재판관할에 관한 연구" (2001), 서울대학교 출판부
  13. 石光現, "民事 및 商事事件의 國際裁判管轄과 外國裁判의 承認 및 執行에 관한 헤이그協約", 1998년 3월 개최된 特別委員會 제2차 회의 참가보고서, 4 (1998)
  14. 손경한, "국제 저작권 분쟁의 국제재판관할-드림웍스 판결을 중심으로-, in 국제지적재산권법 및 국제사법의 논점", 제4회 한일 지적재산권법․국제사법 공동세미나 (2005)
  15. 이규호, "인터넷과 국제재판관할", 정보법학, 11(2), pp.109~143 (2007), 한국정보법학회
  16. 이규호, "著作權關聯 國際民事訴訟에 있어 不適切한 法廷地 法理", 季刊 著作權, (68), pp.16~31 (2004)
  17. 이규호, "지적재산권에 관한 외국재판의 승인 및 집행에 대한 연구", 법학연구, 14(3), pp.59~100 (2004), 법학연구원
  18. 李聖昊, "사이버 知的財産權 紛爭에 관한 國際裁判管轄과 準據法", 저스티스, 72, pp.138~200 (2003), 한국법학원
  19. 이성호, "사이버 지적재산권분쟁의 재판관할과 준거법", 국제사법연구, (8) (2003)
  20. 李時潤, "新民事訴訟法" (2006), 博英社
  21. 韓忠洙, "國際私法의 誕生과 國際裁判管轄", 法曹, (536) (2001)
  22. 韓忠洙, "民事訴訟法의 改正과 國際裁判管轄-涉外私法의 改正案과 관련하여", 民事訴訟(IV), ~ (2001)
  23. 道垣內正人, "裁判管轄等に關する條約採擇をぬぐゐ現況(上)", ジュリスト, (1211), pp.88~89 (2001)
  24. Jack L. Goldsmith, "Against Cyberanarchy", U. Chi. L. Rev, 65, pp.1199~ (1998)
  25. Lawrence Lessig, "The Path of Cyberlaw", Yale L.J, 104, pp.1743~ (1995)
  26. "A Swedish Proposal for a Law About Computer-Mediated Communication" (2009)[URL]
  27. Adria Allen, "Internet Jurisdiction Today", Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus, 22(69), pp.75~76 (2001)
  28. Andreas Lowenfeld, "International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness 46", ~ (1996)
  29. Arthur T. von Mehren, "Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis", Harv. L. Rev, 79, pp.1121~1127 (1966)
  30. Benjamin Wittes, "Information-Highway Robbery: Is Law Enforcement Ready for Cybercrime?" (1994), Legal Times
  31. Bernard H. Oxman, "Jurisdiction of States, in Encyclopedia of Public International Law 277", Rudolf Bernhardt ed, ~ (1987)
  32. David Plotnikoff, "Bite Lacking in Protests of On-Line Censorship", San Jose Mercury News, 4~ (1996)
  33. Eli M. Noam, "An Unfettered Internet ? Keep Dreaming", N.Y. Times, ~ (1997), at A1
  34. European Legal Studies Center of Columbia University, "Opinion 1", 03,Competence of the Community to Conclude the New Lugano Convention on the Jurisdiction And the Recognition And Enforcement of Judgments in Civil And Commercial Matters, 2007, pp.13, 189~191
  35. F.A. Mann, "The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited After Twenty Years", R.C.A.D.I, 186, pp.9~26 (1984)
  36. "FTC Halts Internet Pyramid Scheme" (1997)[URL]
  37. Gary B. Born, "Reflections on Judicial Jurisdiction in International Cases", Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L, 17, pp.1~33 (1987)
  38. Geanne Rosenberg, "Trying to Resolve Jurisdictional Rules on the Internet", N.Y. Times, ~ (1997), at D1
  39. George Cole, "Censorship in Cyberspace", 1996 WL 615112, ~ (1996), at 20
  40. "Ministerial Conference Bonn 6-8 July 1997" (2009)[URL]
  41. Holger Hestermeyer, "Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Torts", Nw.J. Int’l L. & Bus, 26, pp.267~268 (2006)
  42. Holger Hestermeyer, "Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Torts", Nw.J. Int’l L. & Bus, 26, pp.267~268 (2006)
  43. Howard Goldberg, "CompuServe Blocks Access to Sex Forums on Net", Chi. Sun-Times, ~ (1995), at 12
  44. International Chamber of Commerce, "The Extraterritorial Application of National Laws", Dieter Lange & Gary Born eds, 38~40 (1987)
  45. Jason Coppel, "A Hard Look at the Effects Doctrine of Jurisdiction in Public International Law", Leiden J. Int’l L, 6, pp.73~ (1993)
  46. John Berry, "Who will Tax the Web?", Internet World, ~ (1997), at 37
  47. John H. Cushman, Jr, "Basque Web Site Suspended After Protests", N.Y. Times, ~ (1997), at D3
  48. John Markoff, "German Pornography Laws Determine What America Sees", N.Y. Times, ~ (1995), at 2
  49. John Markoff, "On-Line Service Blocks Access to Topics Called Pornographic", N.Y. Times, ~, at A1
  50. Julian Dibbell, "A Rape in Cyberspace", The Village Voice, ~ (1993), at 36
  51. Lea Brilmayer, "Justifying International Acts 107", ~ (1989)
  52. "Holocaust Survivors Sue Yahoo! Over Nazi Auctions" (2009)[URL]
  53. Mark Eckenwiler, "Criminal Law and the Internet", Legal Times, ~ (1995), at S32
  54. Marrel Menthe, "Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: A Theory of International Spaces", Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev, 4, pp.69~ (1998)
  55. Martin H. Samson, "Trademark Lawsuits in Cyberspace", N.Y. L.J, ~ (1996), at S1
  56. Matthew Fagin, "Comment, Regulating Speech Across Borders: Technology vs. Value", Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev, 9, pp.395~430 (2003)
  57. Megan Waples, "Note, The Adequate Alternative Forum Analysis in Forum Non Conveniens: A Case for Reform", Conn. L. Rev, 36, pp.1475~1475 (2004)
  58. "cr_Internet_Liberation_Army_--_(last visit on June 28,2009)" (2009)[URL]
  59. Nathaniel Nash, "Holding Compuserve Responsible", N.Y. Times, ~ (1996), at D4
  60. Peter H. Lewis, "Limiting A Medium Without Boundaries", N.Y. Times, ~ (1996), at D
  61. Peter Nygh, "Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 44", Hague Conference on Private International Law (2000)
  62. "A Look at How U.S. Based Yahoo! Was Condemned by French Law" (2000)[URL]
  63. Rosalind Resnick, "Cybertort: The New Era", Nat’l L.J, ~ (1994), at A1
  64. Stephan Wilske, "International Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Which States May Regulate the Internet ?", Fed. Comm. L. J, pp.117~124 (1997)
  65. "Transnational Issues in Cyberspace: A Project on the Law Relating to Jurisdiction"[URL]
  66. "The Gaming Club"[URL]
  67. "Paris" (2000)[URL]
  68. "A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)