스페인어 ‘lo que’ 자유 관계절(Free Relative Clauses) 연구
A research on the Free Relative Clauses in Spanish
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to account for the syntactic peculiarities of Spanish Free Relative Clauses and to provide an appropriate analysis for them. On the basis of the 'multidominant structure' adopted in more recent works by Wilder(1999, 2008), Citko(2005, 2011), Riemsdijk(2006a,b), among others, we will propose a novel analysis of the free relative clauses in Spanish. More specifically, it is assumed that the neutral definite article 'lo' forms the relative DP merging with the empty pronoun 'pro' and that this relative DP 'lo+pro' moves to Spec-CP in order to checking its [+rel] feature. We suppose under this hypothesis that the relative DP, which has moved to Spec-CP, merges again with the matrix verb yielding the multidominant structure. Our multidominance analysis can well account for the so-called 'Matching Condition', which is generally observed in Free Relative Clauses. However, this multidominance analysis is so strict that it can not explain the Spanish data in which the Matching Condition is not satisfied. To resolve this problem, we assume that some Spanish verbs that subcategorize CP as a complement do not merge with the relative DP, but with the CP that contains it in its Spec position and in this case the multidominant structure is not formed.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to account for the syntactic peculiarities of Spanish Free Relative Clauses and to provide an appropriate analysis for them. On the basis of the 'multidominant structure' adopted in more recent works by Wilder(1999, 2008), Citko(2005, 2011), Riemsdijk(2006a,b), among others, we will propose a novel analysis of the free relative clauses in Spanish. More specifically, it is assumed that the neutral definite article 'lo' forms the relative DP merging with the empty pronoun 'pro' and that this relative DP 'lo+pro' moves to Spec-CP in order to checking its [+rel] feature. We suppose under this hypothesis that the relative DP, which has moved to Spec-CP, merges again with the matrix verb yielding the multidominant structure. Our multidominance analysis can well account for the so-called 'Matching Condition', which is generally observed in Free Relative Clauses. However, this multidominance analysis is so strict that it can not explain the Spanish data in which the Matching Condition is not satisfied. To resolve this problem, we assume that some Spanish verbs that subcategorize CP as a complement do not merge with the relative DP, but with the CP that contains it in its Spec position and in this case the multidominant structure is not formed.
참고문헌 (29)
- Bianchi, V., "Consequences of Antisymmetry. Headed Relative Clauses" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Bianchi, V., "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley (1996)", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.123~140 (2000)
- Matching Effects and the Syntax-Morphology Interface: Evidence from Hindi Correlatives, "Bhatt, R.", MIT, 53~68, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 31 (1998)
- Bresnan, J., "The syntax of free relatives in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 9, pp.331~391 (1978)
- Caponigro, I., "Free Relatives as DPs with a Silent D and a CP Complement", Proceedings of Western Conference of Linguistics(WECOL 2000), pp.140~150 (2002)
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures" (1981), Foris Publications
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik" (2000), The MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky's minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics", pp.1~30 (2007), De Gruyter Mouton
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~136 (2008), MIT Press
- Citko, B., "On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.475~496 (2005)
- Citko, B., "Missing labels", Lingua, 118, pp.907~944 (2008)
- Citko, B., "Symmetry in Syntax" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Gracanin-Yuksek, "About sharing", Doctor, pp.2007
- Johnson, K., "Gapping is not (VP) ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.289~328 (2009)
- Groos, A., "Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar", pp.171~216 (1981), Scuola Normale Superiore
- Harbert, W., "On the Nature of the Matching Parameter", The Linguistic Review, 2, pp.237~284 (1983)
- Hirschbühler, P., "Remarks on Free Relatives and Matching Phenomena", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.505~520 (1983)
- Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Ojea, A., "On Mixed Categories: The Case of Free Relatives", SKY Journal of Linguistics, 24, pp.119~143 (2011)
- Ott, D., "A note on free relative clauses in the theory of phases", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.3~192 (2011)
- Plann, S., "Relative Clauses in Spanish without overt antecedents and related constructions", Doctor, pp.1980
- Riemsdijk, V., "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax vol II", pp.338~382 (2006)
- Riemsdijk, V., "Phases of Interpretation" (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Suñer, M., "Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter", The Linguistic Review, 3, pp.363~387 (1984)
- de Vries, M., "On multidominance and linearization", Biolinguistics, 3, pp.344~403 (2009)
- Wilder, C., "Right node raising and the LCA", Proceeding of the Eighteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 18, pp.586~598 (1999), Cascadilla Press
- Wilder, C., "Topics in Ellipsis", pp.229~258 (2008), Cambridge University Press