본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

冒充专利行为犯罪化的必要性及 完善建议

On the necessity of criminalizing the act of passing off patent and suggestions for improvement

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

在中国经济不断飞速发展的关键时期, 中国有关部门及法律保护知识产权的任务也越来越重。国务院2008年6月发布 ≪国家知识产权战略纲要≫, 确立了中国要建设成为创新型国家的战略目标。专利制度的有效保护, 在推动建设创新型国家, 推动中国科教兴国战略具有重大的作用, 是不可缺少的一项重要制度。但随着中国专利申请数量以及授权数量的大幅度增加, 经济的飞速发展, 专利侵权行为也开始呈现出多样化复杂化的趋势, 在这其中的一些专利侵权行为, 仅仅依靠民事、行政手段难以做到有效的保护, 因而亟需加强专利权的刑法保护, 冒充专利行为与假冒专利行为是两个不同的行为, 但两种行为的社会危害性相当, 但中国刑法仅仅对假冒他人专利的行为规定了刑法处罚, 对冒充专利行为却没有作出相关规定, 因此本文通过对冒充专利行为的现状以及国外立法进行分析, 提出冒充专利行为犯罪化的必要性和完善建议。

Abstract

In the critical period of China’s rapid economic development, China’s relevantdepartments and legal protection of intellectual property rights are becoming moreand more important. In June 2008, the State Council issued the outline of nationalintellectual property strategy, which established the strategic goal of building Chinainto an innovative country. The effective protection of patent system plays animportant role in promoting the construction of an innovative country and thestrategy of rejuvenating China through science and education. However, with therapid development of China’s economy, the number of patent applications andauthorizations has increased significantly. With the rapid development of economy,patent infringement has also begun to show a trend of diversification and complexity. Some of these patent infringement behaviors can not be effectively protected only bycivil and administrative means. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the criminalprotection of patent rights. There are two kinds of counterfeiting patents andcounterfeiting patents The former can constitute a crime, while the latter violatesadministrative regulations and does not violate criminal law. However, the socialharmfulness of counterfeiting patent is equivalent to that of counterfeiting patent. When amending the patent law in 2008, China’s legislature redefined the legalliability of patent counterfeiting, clearly stipulating that those who are serious enoughto be prosecuted for criminal responsibility. However, the subsequent amendment tothe criminal law did not make corresponding amendments to the relevant provisions,resulting in the failure to implement the original legislative intent of the patent law. Therefore, China’s criminal law only provides criminal punishment for the act ofcounterfeiting other people’s patent, but does not make relevant provisions on the actof counterfeiting patent. Therefore, this paper analyzes the status quo of the act ofcounterfeiting patent and foreign legislation, and puts forward the necessity andimprovement suggestions of criminalizing the act of passing off patent.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 刘少谷, "刑法规制假冒专利行为的困境与对策", 中州学刊, (3) (2019)
  2. 凌宗亮, "假冒他人专利与冒充专利不应区分", 电子知识产权, (1) (2008)
  3. 刘 蓓, "刑法中假冒专利罪与冒充专利罪的辨析", 法制与社会, (27) (2008)
  4. 刘少谷, "刑法规制假冒专利行为的困境与对策", 中州学刊, (3) (2019)
  5. 于建萍, "论冒充专利行为的犯罪化", 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 42(2) (2019)
  6. 张 旭, "假冒专利行为的民刑责任及其制度改进", 硕士, pp.2017
  7. 马克昌, "犯罪通论", pp.26~ (1996), 武汉大学出版社
  8. 杨兴培, "经济犯罪和经济刑法研究", pp.29~ (2006), 北京大学出版社
  9. 于建平, "应把 “冒充专利”行为纳入刑法规制", 人民检察, (3.) (2018)
  10. 周国文, "刑罚的界限--Joelfeinberg的 “道德界限”与超越" (2008), 中国检察出版社
  11. 贺志军, "刑法中的 “假冒他人专利”新释", 法商研究, 36(6) (2019)
  12. 郑 璇, "冒充专利行为的犯罪化研究", 硕士, pp.2015

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)