Determination of the quality of stripe-marked and cracked eggs during storage
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Stripe marks, which occasionally occur on the shell, do not cause breakage to the shell and shell membranes of eggs. This study investigated the quality of intact eggs (IEs), minor stripe-marked eggs (MEs), severe stripe-marked eggs (SEs), and cracked eggs (CEs) during 3-week storage at 25°C. Methods: Shell eggs were collected the day after being laid and were washed. Among them, eggs without any visual cracks or stripe marks on the shells were evaluated as IEs by the plant employees using candling in a darkened egg storage room; the remaining eggs exhibited some eggshell defects. At day 3, the eggs were further categorized into IEs, MEs, SEs, CEs, and broken eggs (BEs) on the basis of the description given. Except BEs, which were discarded, the remaining eggs were stored at 25°C (approximate relative humidity 50%) and then analyzed. Results: Stripe marks were observed primarily within the first 3 days after washing. At day 3, CEs had significantly (p<0.05) lower Haugh unit values, but all eggs had grades AA or A, according to the United States Department of Agriculture standard. As storage time increased, differences in egg quality between groups were more obvious. IEs had the highest eggshell breaking strength. During storage, the total plate counts and pathogens, namely Escherichia coli, Campylobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp., were not detectable in the internal content of IEs and SEs. Conclusion: In conclusion, cracks degraded egg quality severely and minor stripe marks only slightly influenced the egg quality.
Abstract
Objective: Stripe marks, which occasionally occur on the shell, do not cause breakage to the shell and shell membranes of eggs. This study investigated the quality of intact eggs (IEs), minor stripe-marked eggs (MEs), severe stripe-marked eggs (SEs), and cracked eggs (CEs) during 3-week storage at 25°C. Methods: Shell eggs were collected the day after being laid and were washed. Among them, eggs without any visual cracks or stripe marks on the shells were evaluated as IEs by the plant employees using candling in a darkened egg storage room; the remaining eggs exhibited some eggshell defects. At day 3, the eggs were further categorized into IEs, MEs, SEs, CEs, and broken eggs (BEs) on the basis of the description given. Except BEs, which were discarded, the remaining eggs were stored at 25°C (approximate relative humidity 50%) and then analyzed. Results: Stripe marks were observed primarily within the first 3 days after washing. At day 3, CEs had significantly (p<0.05) lower Haugh unit values, but all eggs had grades AA or A, according to the United States Department of Agriculture standard. As storage time increased, differences in egg quality between groups were more obvious. IEs had the highest eggshell breaking strength. During storage, the total plate counts and pathogens, namely Escherichia coli, Campylobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp., were not detectable in the internal content of IEs and SEs. Conclusion: In conclusion, cracks degraded egg quality severely and minor stripe marks only slightly influenced the egg quality.
참고문헌 (28)
- Yuceer M, "Antimicrobial lysozyme-chitosan coatings affect functional properties and shelf life of chicken eggs during storage", J Sci Food Agr, 94, pp.153~162 (2014)
- Chukwuka OK, "Egg quality defects in poultry management and food safety", Asian J Agric Res, 5, pp.1~16 (2011)
- King’ori AM, "Egg quality deffects: Types, causes and occurrence: a review", J Anim Prod Adv, 2, pp.350~357 (2012)
- Roberts JR, "Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens", J Poult Sci, 41, pp.161~177 (2004)
- Wellman-Labadie O, "Antimicrobial activity of the Anseriform outer eggshell and cuticle", Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol, 149, pp.640~649 (2008)
- Hamilton RMG, "Methods and factors that affect the measurement of egg shell quality", Poult Sci, 61, pp.2022~2039 (1982)
- Barnett DM, "Hatchability and early chick growth potential of broiler breeder eggs with hairline cracks", J Appl Poult Res, 13, pp.65~70 (2004)
- Khabisi MM, "The influence of egg shell crack types on hatchability and chick quality", Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 36, pp.289~295 (2012)
- Todd ECD, "Risk assessment of use of cracked eggs in Canada", Int J Food Microbiol, 30, pp.125~143 (1996)
- De Ketelaere B, "Eggshell crack detection based on acoustic resonance frequency analysis", J Agr Eng Res, 76, pp.157~163 (2000)
- Samli HE, "Effects of storage time and temperature on egg quality in old laying hens", J Appl Poult Res, 14, pp.548~553 (2005)
- Huang Q, "Estimation of egg freshness using S-ovalbumin as an indicator", Poult Sci, 91, pp.739~743 (2012)
- Ragni L, "Dielectric characterization of hen eggs during storage", J Food Eng, 82, pp.450~459 (2007)
- AOAC International, "Official methods of analysis of AOAC International", AOAC International, ~ (1990)
- Sun CJ, "Global variation and uniformity of eggshell thickness for chicken eggs", Poult Sci, 91, pp.2718~2721 (2012)
- Torrico DD, "Mineral oil-chitosan emulsion coatings affect quality and shelf‐life of coated eggs during refrigerated and room temperature storage", J Food Sci, 76, pp.S262~S268 (2011)
- Cader S, "Assessment of the microbial safety and quality of eggs from small and large-scale hen breeders", J World's Poult Res, 4, pp.75~81 (2014)
- Statistical Analysis System (SAS) Institute Inc, "Version 9.4", SAS Institute Inc, ~ (2014)
- USDA, "United States standards, grades, and weight classes for shell eggs. AMS 56.210", AMS, ~ (2000)
- Monira KN, "Effect of breed and holding period on egg quality characteristics of chicken", Int J Poult Sci, 2, pp.261~263 (2003)
- Messens W, "Eggshell penetration by Salmonella: a review", Worlds Poult Sci J, 61, pp.71~86 (2005)
- Ricke SC, "Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods", pp.473~481 (2001), American Public Health Association
- Theron H, "Bacterial growth on chicken eggs in various storage environments", Food Res Int, 36, pp.969~975 (2003)
- De Reu K, "Eggshell factors influencing eggshell penetration and whole egg contamination by different bacteria, including Salmonella enteritidis", Int J Food Microbiol, 112, pp.253~260 (2006)
- Rose-Martel M, "Proteomic analysis provides new insight into the chicken eggshell cuticle", J Proteomics, 75, pp.2697~2706 (2012)
- Wang J, "Eggshell crack detection by dynamic frequency analysis", Eur Food Res Technol, 221, pp.214~220 (2005)
- Lawrence KC, "Imaging system with modified-pressure chamber for crack detection in shell eggs", Sens Instrum Food Qual Saf, 2, pp.116~122 (2008)
- Arivazhagan S, "External and internal defect detection of egg using machine vision", J Emerg Trends Comput Inform Sci, 4, pp.257~262 (2013)