Current situation and future prospects for beef production in Europe — A review
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The European Union (EU) is the world’s third largest producer of beef. This contributes to the economy, rural development, social life, culture and gastronomy of Europe. The diversity of breeds, animal types (cows, bulls, steers, heifers) and farming systems (intensive, extensive on permanent or temporary pastures, mixed, breeders, feeders, etc) is a strength, and a weakness as the industry is often fragmented and poorly connected. There are also societal concerns regarding animal welfare and environmental issues, despite some positive environmental impacts of farming systems. The EU is amongst the most efficient for beef production as demonstrated by a relative low production of greenhouse gases. Due to regional differences in terms of climate, pasture availability, livestock practices and farms characteristics, productivity and incomes of beef producers vary widely across regions, being among the lowest of the agricultural systems. The beef industry is facing unprecedented challenges related to animal welfare, environmental impact, origin, authenticity, nutritional benefits and eating quality of beef. These may affect the whole industry, especially its farmers. It is therefore essential to bring the beef industry together to spread best practice and better exploit research to maintain and develop an economically viable and sustainable beef industry. Meeting consumers’ expectations may be achieved by a better prediction of beef palatability using a modelling approach, such as in Australia. There is a need for accurate information and dissemination on the benefits and issues of beef for human health and for environmental impact. A better objective description of goods and services derived from livestock farming is also required. Putting into practice “agroecology” and organic farming principles are other potential avenues for the future. Different future scenarios can be written depending on the major driving forces, notably meat consumption, climate change, environmental policies and future organization of the supply chain.
Abstract
The European Union (EU) is the world’s third largest producer of beef. This contributes to the economy, rural development, social life, culture and gastronomy of Europe. The diversity of breeds, animal types (cows, bulls, steers, heifers) and farming systems (intensive, extensive on permanent or temporary pastures, mixed, breeders, feeders, etc) is a strength, and a weakness as the industry is often fragmented and poorly connected. There are also societal concerns regarding animal welfare and environmental issues, despite some positive environmental impacts of farming systems. The EU is amongst the most efficient for beef production as demonstrated by a relative low production of greenhouse gases. Due to regional differences in terms of climate, pasture availability, livestock practices and farms characteristics, productivity and incomes of beef producers vary widely across regions, being among the lowest of the agricultural systems. The beef industry is facing unprecedented challenges related to animal welfare, environmental impact, origin, authenticity, nutritional benefits and eating quality of beef. These may affect the whole industry, especially its farmers. It is therefore essential to bring the beef industry together to spread best practice and better exploit research to maintain and develop an economically viable and sustainable beef industry. Meeting consumers’ expectations may be achieved by a better prediction of beef palatability using a modelling approach, such as in Australia. There is a need for accurate information and dissemination on the benefits and issues of beef for human health and for environmental impact. A better objective description of goods and services derived from livestock farming is also required. Putting into practice “agroecology” and organic farming principles are other potential avenues for the future. Different future scenarios can be written depending on the major driving forces, notably meat consumption, climate change, environmental policies and future organization of the supply chain.
참고문헌 (76)
- [URL]
- Metzger MJ, "How do Europeans want to live in 2040? Citizen visions and their consequences for European land use", Reg Environ Change, 18, pp.789~802 (2018)[DOI]
- Gerber PJ, "Tackling climate change through livestock - A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities" (2013)
- Ryschawy J, "Assessing multiple goods and services derived from livestock farming on a nationwide gradient", Animal, 11, pp.1861~1872 (2017)[DOI]
- Bouvard V, "International agency for research on cancer monograph working group. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat", Lancet Oncol, 16, pp.1599~1600 (2015)[DOI]
- Li C, "The role of beef in human nutrition and health;Ensuring safety and quality in the production of beef. Volume 2: Quality", pp.329~338 (2017), Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited
- Regan A, "Conceptualising responsibility in the aftermath of the horsemeat adulteration incident: an online study with Irish and UK consumers", Health Risk Soc, 17, pp.149~167 (2015)[DOI]
- Barnett J, "Consumers' confidence, reflections and response strategies following the horsemeat incident", Food Control, 59, pp.721~730 (2016)[DOI]
- , VPC-2017-33-2-8, "Viandes & Produits Carnes", 2017, ~
- [URL]
- Lherm M, "Status and trends of suckler beef production in France and in three European countries;Suckler beef production, 30", pp.93~106 (2017)
- Henchion M, "Ethical and sustainable aspects of meat production; consumer perceptions and system credibility;New aspects of meat quality - from genes to ethics", pp.649~666 (2017), Woodhead publishing Limited
- Hocquette JF, "Is in vitro meat the solution for the future?", Meat Sci, 120, pp.167~176 (2016)[DOI]
- Scollan ND, "Enhancing the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality", Meat Sci, 97, pp.384~394 (2014)[DOI]
- Hocquette JF, "Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability", Meat Sci, 97, pp.316~322 (2014)[DOI]
- Troy DJ, "Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry", Meat Sci, 86, pp.214~226 (2010)[DOI]
- Patou-Mathis M, "Meat eaters. From prehistory to nowadays", pp.408~ (2009), Editions Perrin
- Polkinghorne RJ, "Meat standards and grading. A world view", Meat Sci, 86, pp.227~235 (2010)[DOI]
- [URL]
- Van Huis A, "New sources of animal proteins: edible insects;New aspects of meat quality - from genes to ethics", pp.443~461 (2017), Woodhead Publishing Limited
- Leroy F, "Animal killing and postdomestic meat production", J Agric Environ Ethic, 30, pp.67~86 (2017)[DOI]
- Chapouthier G, "Respect for animals through the ages: from mere objects to sentient beings", Bull Acad Vet France, 162, pp.5~12 (2009)
- Wolff F, "Legal and moral consequences of the non-existence of the animal", Pouvoirs, 131, pp.135~147 (2009)[DOI]
- ", VPC-2017-33-1-5"[URL]
- Veysset P, "Analysis and determinants of the performances evolution of sheep for meat and suckler cattle farms in less favored areas from 1990 to 2012", INRA Prod Anim, 27, pp.49~64 (2014)
- [URL]
- Holm L, "The role of meat in everyday food culture: An analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen", Appetite, 34, pp.277~283 (2000)[DOI]
- Font-I-Furnols M, "Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: an overview", Meat Sci, 98, pp.361~371 (2014)[DOI]
- Stanciu S, "Horse Meat consumption - between scandal and reality", Procedia Econ Finance, 23, pp.697~703 (2015)[DOI]
- Moyer DC, "The economics of a food fraud incident - Case studies and examples including Melamine in Wheat Gluten", Food Control, 71, pp.358~364 (2017)[DOI]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- ", VPC-2016-32-4-2"[URL]
- Laisney C, "Social differences in diet. Centre D'etudes et de Prospective, Analyse", pp.64~ (2013)
- NIAA, "Living in a world of decreasing resources and increasing regulation: how to advance animal agriculture", Annual Conference of the National Institute for Animal Agriculture (2012)
- Bhat ZF, "In vitro meat: a future animal-free harvest", Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 57, pp.782~789 (2017)[DOI]
- Le Mouel C, "How to feed the World: Is reducing meat consumption part of the solution", International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (2015)
- van Zanten HHE, "Opinion paper: The role of livestock in a sustainable diet: a land-use perspective", Animal, 10, pp.547~549 (2016)[DOI]
- Bonny SPF, "What is Artificial Meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry?", J Integr Agric, 14, pp.255~263 (2015)[DOI]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- Jeremiah LE, "Assessment of the chemical and cooking properties of the major beef muscles and muscle groups", Meat Sci, 65, pp.985~992 (2003)[DOI]
- Ahhmed AM, "A review of meat protein hydrolysates and hypertension", Meat Sci, 86, pp.110~118 (2010)[DOI]
- Stadnik J, "Meat and fermented meat products as a source of bioactive peptides", Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment, 14, pp.181~190 (2015)[DOI]
- Decker EA, "Healthier meat products as functional foods", Meat Sci, 86, pp.49~55 (2014)
- Geay Y, "Effect of nutritional factors on biochemical, structural and metabolic characteristics of muscles in ruminants; consequences on dietetic value and sensorial qualities of meat", Reprod Nutr Dev, 41, pp.1~26 (2001)[DOI]
- Amit M, "Vegetarian diets in children and adolescents", Paediatr Child Health, 15, pp.303~314 (2010)
- ", VPC-2016-2032-2011-2016"[URL]
- Farmer LJ, "Beef eating quality - a European journey", Animal (2018)
- Hocquette JF, "Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality", Meat Sci, 92, pp.197~209 (2012)[DOI]
- Thaler RH, "Transaction utility theory", Adv Consum Res, 10, pp.296~301 (1983)
- Thaler RH, "Mental accounting and consumer choice", Mark Sci, 4-3, pp.199~214 (1985)
- ", VPC-2014-30-5-2"[URL]
- ", VPC-2014-30-6-8"[URL]
- Scollan ND, "Future research priorities for animal production in a changing world", Anim Prod Sci, 51, pp.1~5 (2011)[DOI]
- ", VPC-2015-31-4-3"[URL]
- Bonny SPF, "European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality", Animal, 10, pp.996~1006 (2016)[DOI]
- Bonny SPF, "The variability of the eating quality of European beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction", Animal, 2, pp.1~9 (2018)
- Hocquette JF, "Win-win strategies for high beef quality, consumer satisfaction, and farm efficiency, low environmental impacts and improved animal welfare", Anim Prod Sci, 54, pp.1537~1548 (2014)[DOI]
- Farmer LJ, "Prediction of eating quality using the Meat Standards Australia system for Northern Ireland beef and consumers", International Congress on Meat Science and Technology, pp.PE7~PE34 (2009)
- Farmer LJ, "Effect of type and extent of cooking on the eating quality of Northern Ireland beef", International Congress on Meat Science and Technology, pp.PE7~PE33 (2009)
- Legrand I, "Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system", Animal, 7, pp.524~529 (2013)[DOI]
- Guzek D, "Influence of cut and thermal treatment on consumer perception of bee fin Polish trials", Pak J Agric Sci, 52, pp.533~538 (2015)
- Thompson JM, "Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers", Aust J Exp Agric, 48, pp.1380~1388 (2008)[DOI]
- Hwang IH, "Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers", Aust J Exp Agric, 48, pp.1387~1395 (2008)[DOI]
- Polkinghorne RJ, "Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology", Anim Sci J, 82, pp.325~333 (2011)[DOI]
- (2016)[URL]
- Lynch DH, "Framing the social, ecological and economic goods and services derived from organic agriculture in the Canadian context;Organic farming, prototype for sustainable agricultures", pp.347~365 (2014), Springer Netherlands, Springer
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, "Ecosystem goods and services in development planning: a good practice guide", Montreal, pp.80+iv~ (2010)
- Lesschen JP, "Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 166-167, pp.16~28 (2011)[DOI]
- ", VPC-2017-33-2-2"[URL]
- Dumont B, "Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century", Animal, 7, pp.1028~1043 (2013)[DOI]
- Hyland JJ, "The role of meat in strategies to achieve a sustainable diet lower in greenhouse gas emissions: a review", Meat Sci, 132, pp.189~195 (2017)[DOI]
- de Boer J, ""Meatless days" or "less but better"? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges", Appetite, 76, pp.120~128 (2014)[DOI]
- Ellies Oury MP, "An innovative approach combining animal performances, nutritional value and sensory quality of meat", Meat Sci, 122, pp.163~172 (2016)[DOI]