Effects of feeding level on nutrient digestibility and enteric methane production in growing goats (Capra hircus hircus) and Sika deer (Cervus nippon hortulorum)
3
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of feeding level on nutrient digestibility and enteric methane (CH4) emissions in growing goats and Sika deer. Methods: Three growing male goats (initial body weight [BW] of 22.4±0.9 kg) and three growing male deer (initial BW of 20.2±4.8 kg) were each allotted to a respiration-metabolism chamber for an adaptation period of 7 d and a data collection period of 3 d. An experimental diet was offered to each animal at one of three feeding levels (1.5%, 2.0%, and 2.5% of BW) in a 3×3 Latin square design. The chambers were used for measuring enteric CH4 emission. Results: Nutrient digestibility decreased linearly in goats as feeding level increased, whereas Sika deer digestibility was not affected by feeding level. The enteric production of CH4 expressed as g/kg dry matter intake (DMI), g/kg organic matter intake, and % of gross energy intake decreased linearly with increased feeding level in goats; however, that of Sika deer was not affected by feeding level. Six equations were estimated for predicting the enteric CH4 emission from goats and Sika deer. For goat, equation 1 was found to be of the highest accuracy: CH4 (g/d) = 6.2 (±14.1)+10.2 (±7.01)×DMI (kg/d)+0.0048 (±0.0275)×dry matter digestibility (DMD, g/kg)–0.0070 (±0.0187)×neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD; g/kg). For Sika deer, equation 4 was found to be of the highest accuracy: CH4 (g/d) = –13.0 (±30.8)+29.4 (±3.93)×DMI (kg/d)+0.046 (0.094)×DMD (g/kg)–0.0363 (±0.0636)×NDFD (g/kg). Conclusion: Increasing the feeding level increased CH4 production in both goats and Sika deer, and predictive models of enteric CH4 production by goats and Sika deer were estimated.
Abstract
Objective: Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of feeding level on nutrient digestibility and enteric methane (CH4) emissions in growing goats and Sika deer. Methods: Three growing male goats (initial body weight [BW] of 22.4±0.9 kg) and three growing male deer (initial BW of 20.2±4.8 kg) were each allotted to a respiration-metabolism chamber for an adaptation period of 7 d and a data collection period of 3 d. An experimental diet was offered to each animal at one of three feeding levels (1.5%, 2.0%, and 2.5% of BW) in a 3×3 Latin square design. The chambers were used for measuring enteric CH4 emission. Results: Nutrient digestibility decreased linearly in goats as feeding level increased, whereas Sika deer digestibility was not affected by feeding level. The enteric production of CH4 expressed as g/kg dry matter intake (DMI), g/kg organic matter intake, and % of gross energy intake decreased linearly with increased feeding level in goats; however, that of Sika deer was not affected by feeding level. Six equations were estimated for predicting the enteric CH4 emission from goats and Sika deer. For goat, equation 1 was found to be of the highest accuracy: CH4 (g/d) = 6.2 (±14.1)+10.2 (±7.01)×DMI (kg/d)+0.0048 (±0.0275)×dry matter digestibility (DMD, g/kg)–0.0070 (±0.0187)×neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD; g/kg). For Sika deer, equation 4 was found to be of the highest accuracy: CH4 (g/d) = –13.0 (±30.8)+29.4 (±3.93)×DMI (kg/d)+0.046 (0.094)×DMD (g/kg)–0.0363 (±0.0636)×NDFD (g/kg). Conclusion: Increasing the feeding level increased CH4 production in both goats and Sika deer, and predictive models of enteric CH4 production by goats and Sika deer were estimated.
참고문헌 (31)
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories" (2006)
- Robinson PH, "Some suggestions and guidelines for preparation of manuscripts for submission for consideration for publication", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 134, pp.181~188 (2007)[DOI]
- 나영준, "Effects of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio on nutrient digestibility and enteric methane production in growing goats (Capra hircus hircus) and Sika deer (Cervus nippon hortulorum)", Animal Bioscience, 30(7), pp.967~972 (2017), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Moe PW, "Methane production in dairy cows", J Dairy Sci, 62, pp.1583~1586 (1979)[DOI]
- Okine EK, "Effects of changes in frequency of reticular contractions on fluid and particulate passage rates in cattle", J Anim Sci, 67, pp.3388~3396 (1989)[DOI]
- 정창대, "Effect of Soybean Meal and Soluble Starch on Biogenic Amine Production and Microbial Diversity Using In vitro Rumen Fermentation", Animal Bioscience, 28(1), pp.50~57 (2015), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Goodrich RD, "Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle", J Anim Sci, 58, pp.1484~1498 (1984)[DOI]
- Shaver RD, "Influence of amount of feed intake and forage physical form on digestion and passage of prebloom alfalfa hay in dairy cows", J Dairy Sci, 69, pp.1545~1559 (1986)[DOI]
- Li DH, "A respiration-metabolism chamber system for measuring gas emission and nutrient digestibility in small ruminant animals", Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu, 23, pp.444~450 (2010)
- Omed HM, "Studies of the relationships between pasture type and quality and the feed intake of grazing sheep", pp.1986
- R. Gardinal, "Influence of polymer-coated slow-release urea on total tract apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation and performance of Nellore steers", Animal Bioscience, 30(1), pp.34~41 (2017), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- AOAC International, "Cunniff P. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International" (1995)
- Van Soest PJ, "Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition", J Dairy Sci, 74, pp.3583~3597 (1991)[DOI]
- Blaxter KL, "The utilization of food by sheep and cattle", J Agric Sci, 57, pp.419~425 (1961)[DOI]
- Watson CJ, "Digestibility Studies with ruminants: XII. The comparative digestive powers of sheep and steers", Sci Agric, 28, pp.357~374 (1948)
- Terry RA, "Volatile fatty acid determinations on sheep rumen liquor", Exp Prog Grassld Res Inst, 13, pp.79~80 (1961)
- Fenner H, "Relationship of digestibility and certain rumen fluid components to level of feed intake and time of sampling after feeding", J Dairy Sci, 50, pp.334~344 (1967)[DOI]
- Ammann AP, "Dry matter and energy intake in relation to digestibility in white-tailed deer", J Wildl Manage, 2, pp.195~201 (1973)
- Drozdz A, "Intake and digestibility of natural feeds by roe-deer", Acta Theriol (Warsz), 18, pp.81~91 (1973)[DOI]
- Koch RM, "Growth, digestive capability, carcass, and meat characteristics of Bison bison, Bos taurus, and Bos <TEX>${\times}$<", TEX> Bison, 1995, pp.73, 1271~1281
- [URL]
- Galbraith JK, "Intake, digestibility, methane and heat production in bison, wapiti and white-tailed deer", Can J Anim Sci, 78, pp.681~691 (1998)[DOI]
- Islam M, "Effects of feeding Italian ryegrass with corn on rumen environment, nutrient digestibility, methane emission, and energy and nitrogen utilization at two intake levels by goats", Small Rumin Res, 38, pp.165~174 (2000)[DOI]
- Hofmann RR, "Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system", Oecologia, 78, pp.443~457 (1989)[DOI]
- Sauvant D, "Variations in the production of CH4 per unit of digestible organic matter intake", Proc XIe ISRP, pp.350~351 (2009)
- Beauchemin KA, "Enteric methane emissions from growing beef cattle as affected by diet and level of intake", Can J Anim Sci, 86, pp.401~408 (2006)[DOI]
- Blaxter KL, "Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants", Br J Nutr, 19, pp.511~522 (1965)[DOI]
- Dewhurst RJ, "Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function", J Dairy Sci, 86, pp.2612~2621 (2003)[DOI]
- Pinares-Patino CS, "Methane emissions and digestive physiology of non-lactating dairy cows fed pasture forage", Can J Anim Sci, 87, pp.601~613 (2007)[DOI]
- Li X, "Effects of mineral salt supplement on enteric methane emissions, ruminal fermentation and methanogen community of lactating cows", Anim Sci J, 88, pp.1049~1057 (2017)[DOI]
- Patra AK, "Development of statistical models for prediction of enteric methane emission from goats using nutrient composition and intake variables", Agric Ecosyst Environ, 215, pp.89~99 (2016)[DOI]