본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Method development to reduce the fiber content of wheat bran and rice bran through anaerobic fermentation with rumen liquor for use in poultry feed

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: Wheat bran (WB) and rice bran (RB) are the agricultural by-products used as poultry feed in many developing countries. However, their use for poultry feed is limited due to high fiber and the presence of anti-nutritional substances (e.g. β-glucans). The objective of this study was to develop a method to improve the quality of those brans by reducing the fiber content. Methods: A two-step fermentation method was developed where the second fermentation of first fermented dry bran was carried out. Fermentation was performed at a controlled environment for 3 h and 6 h (n = 6). The composition of brans, buffer solution and rumen liquor was maintained in a ratio of 1:2:3, respectively. Brans were analyzed for dry matter, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) content. Celluloses and hemicelluloses were calculated from the difference of ADF-ADL and NDF-ADF, respectively. Samples were compared by two-factor analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (p<0.05). Results: CF %, ADF % and cellulose tended to decrease and NDF % and hemicellulose content was reduced significantly (p<0.05). After the 1st fermentation step, NDF decreased 10.7%± 0.55% after 3 h vs 17.0%±0.78% after 6 h in case of WB. Whereas, these values were 2.3%± 0.30% (3 h) and 7.5%±0.69% (6 h) in case of RB. However, after the 2nd fermentation step, the decrease in the NDF content amounted to 9.1%±0.72% (3 h), 17.4%±1.13% (6 h) and 9.3%±0.46% (3 h), 10.0%±0.68% (6 h) in WB and RB, respectively. Cellulose and hemicellulose content was reduced up to 15.6%±0.85% (WB), 15.8%±2.20% (RB) and 36.6%±2.42% (WB), 15.9%±3.53% (RB), respectively after 2nd fermentation of 6 h. Conclusion: Two-step fermentation process improved the quality of the brans for their use in poultry feed.

Abstract

Objective: Wheat bran (WB) and rice bran (RB) are the agricultural by-products used as poultry feed in many developing countries. However, their use for poultry feed is limited due to high fiber and the presence of anti-nutritional substances (e.g. β-glucans). The objective of this study was to develop a method to improve the quality of those brans by reducing the fiber content. Methods: A two-step fermentation method was developed where the second fermentation of first fermented dry bran was carried out. Fermentation was performed at a controlled environment for 3 h and 6 h (n = 6). The composition of brans, buffer solution and rumen liquor was maintained in a ratio of 1:2:3, respectively. Brans were analyzed for dry matter, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) content. Celluloses and hemicelluloses were calculated from the difference of ADF-ADL and NDF-ADF, respectively. Samples were compared by two-factor analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (p<0.05). Results: CF %, ADF % and cellulose tended to decrease and NDF % and hemicellulose content was reduced significantly (p<0.05). After the 1st fermentation step, NDF decreased 10.7%± 0.55% after 3 h vs 17.0%±0.78% after 6 h in case of WB. Whereas, these values were 2.3%± 0.30% (3 h) and 7.5%±0.69% (6 h) in case of RB. However, after the 2nd fermentation step, the decrease in the NDF content amounted to 9.1%±0.72% (3 h), 17.4%±1.13% (6 h) and 9.3%±0.46% (3 h), 10.0%±0.68% (6 h) in WB and RB, respectively. Cellulose and hemicellulose content was reduced up to 15.6%±0.85% (WB), 15.8%±2.20% (RB) and 36.6%±2.42% (WB), 15.9%±3.53% (RB), respectively after 2nd fermentation of 6 h. Conclusion: Two-step fermentation process improved the quality of the brans for their use in poultry feed.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Sell-Kubiak E, "Genetic aspects of feed efficiency and reduction of environmental footprint in broilers : a review", J Appl Genet, 58, pp.487~498 (2017)
  2. Mottet A, "Global poultry production : current state and future outlook and challenges", World's Poult Sci J, 73, pp.245~256 (2017)
  3. Ravindran V, "Poultry development review: Poultry feed availability and nutrition in developing countries" (2013), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  4. Supriyati, "Nutritional Value of Rice Bran Fermented by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Humic Substances and Its Utilization as a Feed Ingredient for Broiler Chickens", Animal Bioscience, 28(2), pp.231~238 (2015), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  5. Kras RV, "Effect of dietary fiber and genetic strain on the performance and energy balance of broiler chickens", Braz J Poult Sci, 15, pp.15~19 (2013)
  6. Satinder K, "Functional properties and anti-nutritional factors in cereal bran", Asian J Food Agro-Ind, 4, pp.122~131 (2011)
  7. Tahir MI, "Comparative evaluation of maize bran, wheat bran and rice bran on milk production of Holstein Friesian cattle", Int J Agric Biol, 4, pp.559~560 (2002)
  8. Hasselman K, "The effect of β-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chicks fed on barley of low-or high viscosity", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 15, pp.83~93 (1986)
  9. Munir K, "A review on role of exogenous enzyme supplementation in poultry production", Emir J Food Agric, 25, pp.66~80 (2013)
  10. Ravindran V, "Feed enzymes : The science, practice, and metabolic realities", J Appl Poult Res, 22, pp.628~636 (2013)
  11. Y. Wang, "Rumen Microbes, Enzymes and Feed Digestion - A Review", Animal Bioscience, 15(11), pp.1659~1676 (2002), 아세아·태평양축산학회
  12. Adeyemi OA, "Replacement of maize by rumen filtrate fermented corn-cob in layer diets", Bioresour Technol, 90, pp.221~224 (2003)
  13. Dijkstra J, "Simulation of the effects of diet on the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fiber in the rumen", Br J Nutr, 74, pp.617~634 (1995)
  14. McDougall EI, "Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva", Biochem J, 43, pp.99~109 (1948)
  15. Shen J, "Monensin and Nisin affect rumen fermentation and microbiota differently in vitro", Front Microbiol, 8, pp.1111~ (2017)
  16. Sechler SR, "Fiber digestion kinetics and protein degradability characteristics of stockpiled Tifton 85 bermudagrass", J Anim Sci, 95, pp.3922~3931 (2017)
  17. Weiss CP, "Effects of feeding condensed distiller’s solubles and crude glycerin alone or in combination on finishing beef cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and in vitro fermentation", J Anim Sci, 95, pp.922~929 (2017)
  18. (2015)[URL]
  19. Van Soest PJ, "Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition", J Dairy Sci, 74, pp.3583~3597 (1991)
  20. Naumann C, "Method Book, Volume III" (1997), VDLUFA Verlag
  21. Lopez D, "In vitro gas production of foliage from three browse tree species treated with different dose levels of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes", J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 100, pp.920~928 (2016)
  22. Duarte AC, "Dose-response effects of dietary pequi oil on fermentation characteristics and microbial population using a rumen simulation technique(Rusitec)", Anaerobe, 48, pp.59~65 (2017)
  23. Duarte AC, "The type of forage substrate preparation included as substrate in a RUSITEC system affects the ruminal microbiota and fermentation characteristics", Front Microbiol, 8, pp.704~ (2017)
  24. Santra A, "Effect of dietary sodium bicarbonate supplementation on fermentation characteristics and ciliate protozoal population in rumen of lambs", Small Rumin Res, 47, pp.203~212 (2003)
  25. Grant RJ, "Digestion kinetics of fiber : influence of in vitro buffer pH varied within observed physiological range", J Dairy Sci, 75, pp.1060~1068 (1992)
  26. Mourino F, "Initial pH as a determinant of cellulose digestion rate by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro", J Dairy Sci, 84, pp.848~859 (2001)
  27. Dijkstra J, "Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 172, pp.22~33 (2012)
  28. Aschenbach J, "Ruminant nutrition symposum : Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH", J Anim Sci, 89, pp.1092~1107 (2011)
  29. Sato S, "Pathophysiological evaluation of subacute ruminal acidosis(SARA)by continuous ruminal pH monitoring", Anim Sci J, 87, pp.168~177 (2016)
  30. Chibisa GE, "Relative contribution of ruminal buffering systems to pH regulation in feedlot cattle fed either low or high-forage diets", Animal, 10, pp.1164~1172 (2016)
  31. Cruywagen CW, "The effect of buffering dairy cow diets with limestone, calcareous marine algae, or sodium bicarbonate on ruminal pH profiles, production responses, and rumen fermentation", J Dairy Sci, 98, pp.5506~5514 (2015)
  32. Wizna, "Improving the Quality of Sago pith and rumen content mixture as poultry feed through fermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens", Pak J Nutr, 7, pp.249~254 (2008)
  33. Jazi V, "Effects of fermented cottonseed meal on the growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora population and small intestinal morphology in broiler chickens", J Br Poult Sci, 58, pp.402~408 (2017)
  34. Aanuoluwapo AA, "Growth performance, haematology and meat quality of broiler chickens fed rumen liquor-fermented wheat bran-based diets", Jordan J Agric Sci, 10, pp.725~736 (2014)
  35. Liu Q, "Effects of dietary protein levels and rumen-protected pantothenate on ruminal fermentation, microbial enzyme activity and bacteria population in Blonde d'Aquitaine × Simmental beef steers", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 232, pp.31~39 (2017)
  36. Reis WLS, "Effects of ruminal and post-ruminal protein supplementation in cattle fed tropical forages on insoluble fiber degradation, activity of fibrolytic enzymes, and the ruminal microbial community profile", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 218, pp.1~16 (2016)
  37. Da Silva LD, "Effects of silage crop and dietary crude protein levels on digestibility ruminal fermentation, nitrogen use efficiency, and performance of finishing beef cattle", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 220, pp.22~33 (2016)
  38. Ouellet DR, "Effect of dietary metabolizable protein level and live yeasts on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows on a high red clover silage diet", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 220, pp.73~82 (2016)
  39. Pantoja J, "Effects of fat saturation and source of fiber on site of nutrient digestion and milk production by lactating dairy cows", J Dairy Sci, 77, pp.2341~2356 (1994)
  40. Oldick BS, "Effects of degree of fat saturation on fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis when diets are fed twelve times daily", J Anim Sci, 78, pp.2412~2420 (2000)
  41. Van Soest PJ, "Nutritional ecology of the ruminant", pp.476~ (1994), Cornell University Press

관련 논문AI추천

Nutritional Value of Rice Bran Fermented by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Humic Substances and Its Utilization as a Feed Ingredient for Broiler ChickensI.W.R. Susana, Supriyati, T. Haryati, T. Susanti아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2015 · 제28권 제2호Effects of fermented feed on growth performance, nutrient metabolism and cecal microflora of broilersLi Jiantao, Tao Lijuan, Yang Guiqin, Zhang Rong아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2022 · 제35권 제4호Ensiling Characteristics and the In situ Nutrient Degradability of a By-product Feed-based Silage곽완섭, 박근규, Y. I. Kim, Y.K. Oh아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2014 · 제27권 제2호Efficacy of combination of endo-xylanase and xylan-debranching enzymes in improving cereal bran utilization in piglet dietCao Qingyun, Dong Zemin, Feng Dingyuan, Wang Weiwei, Ye Hui, Zhang Changming, Zhang Zhenzhen, Zheng Dawen, Zuo Jianjun아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2022 · 제35권 제11호Production performances and antioxidant activities of laying hens fed Aspergillus oryzae and phytase co-fermented wheat branChang Sheng Chang, Chuang Wen Yang, Huang Chung Ming, Lee Tzu Tai, Lin Li Jen, Lin Wei Chih아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2021 · 제34권 제3호Incorporation of unfermented or fermented de-oiled rice bran meal into a rabbit’s diet impacts growth performance, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbiota composition, and intestinal barrier functionDaniel Sindaye, Hang Suqin, Jinghong Liao, Zeid Shehata아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2025 · 제38권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)