Accuracy of genomic-polygenic estimated breeding value for milk yield and fat yield in the Thai multibreed dairy population with five single nucleotide polymorphism sets
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The objectives were to compare variance components, genetic parameters, prediction accuracies, and genomic-polygenic estimated breeding value (EBV) rankings for milk yield (MY) and fat yield (FY) in the Thai multibreed dairy population using five single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sets from GeneSeek GGP80K chip. Methods: The dataset contained monthly MY and FY of 8,361 first-lactation cows from 810 farms. Variance components, genetic parameters, and EBV for five SNP sets from the GeneSeek GGP80K chip were obtained using a 2-trait single-step average-information restricted maximum likelihood procedure. The SNP sets were the complete SNP set (all available SNP; SNP100), top 75% set (SNP75), top 50% set (SNP50), top 25% set (SNP25), and top 5% set (SNP5). The 2-trait models included herd-year-season, heterozygosity and age at first calving as fixed effects, and animal additive genetic and residual as random effects. Results: The estimates of additive genetic variances for MY and FY from SNP subsets were mostly higher than those of the complete set. The SNP25 MY and FY heritability estimates (0.276 and 0.183) were higher than those from SNP75 (0.265 and 0.168), SNP50 (0.275 and 0.179), SNP5 (0.231 and 0.169), and SNP100 (0.251and 0.159). The SNP25 EBV accuracies for MY and FY (39.76% and 33.82%) were higher than for SNP75 (35.01% and 32.60%), SNP50 (39.64% and 33.38%), SNP5 (38.61% and 29.70%), and SNP100 (34.43% and 31.61%). All rank correlations between SNP100 and SNP subsets were above 0.98 for both traits, except for SNP100 and SNP5 (0.93 for MY; 0.92 for FY). Conclusion: The high SNP25 estimates of genetic variances, heritabilities, EBV accuracies, and rank correlations between SNP100 and SNP25 for MY and FY indicated that genotyping animals with SNP25 dedicated chip would be a suitable to maintain genotyping costs low while speeding up genetic progress for MY and FY in the Thai dairy population.
Abstract
Objective: The objectives were to compare variance components, genetic parameters, prediction accuracies, and genomic-polygenic estimated breeding value (EBV) rankings for milk yield (MY) and fat yield (FY) in the Thai multibreed dairy population using five single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sets from GeneSeek GGP80K chip. Methods: The dataset contained monthly MY and FY of 8,361 first-lactation cows from 810 farms. Variance components, genetic parameters, and EBV for five SNP sets from the GeneSeek GGP80K chip were obtained using a 2-trait single-step average-information restricted maximum likelihood procedure. The SNP sets were the complete SNP set (all available SNP; SNP100), top 75% set (SNP75), top 50% set (SNP50), top 25% set (SNP25), and top 5% set (SNP5). The 2-trait models included herd-year-season, heterozygosity and age at first calving as fixed effects, and animal additive genetic and residual as random effects. Results: The estimates of additive genetic variances for MY and FY from SNP subsets were mostly higher than those of the complete set. The SNP25 MY and FY heritability estimates (0.276 and 0.183) were higher than those from SNP75 (0.265 and 0.168), SNP50 (0.275 and 0.179), SNP5 (0.231 and 0.169), and SNP100 (0.251and 0.159). The SNP25 EBV accuracies for MY and FY (39.76% and 33.82%) were higher than for SNP75 (35.01% and 32.60%), SNP50 (39.64% and 33.38%), SNP5 (38.61% and 29.70%), and SNP100 (34.43% and 31.61%). All rank correlations between SNP100 and SNP subsets were above 0.98 for both traits, except for SNP100 and SNP5 (0.93 for MY; 0.92 for FY). Conclusion: The high SNP25 estimates of genetic variances, heritabilities, EBV accuracies, and rank correlations between SNP100 and SNP25 for MY and FY indicated that genotyping animals with SNP25 dedicated chip would be a suitable to maintain genotyping costs low while speeding up genetic progress for MY and FY in the Thai dairy population.
참고문헌 (30)
- Meuwissen TH, "Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps", Genetics, 157, pp.1819~1829 (2001)
- Ben J Hayes, "Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations", Genetics Selection Evolution, 41(1), pp.51~ (2009), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Aguilar I, "Hot topic : A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score", J Dairy Sci, 93, pp.743~752 (2010)[DOI]
- Danai Jattawa, "Comparison of genetic evaluations for milk yield and fat yield using a polygenic model and three genomic–polygenic models with different sets of SNP genotypes in Thai multibreed dairy cattle", Livestock Science, 181, pp.58~64 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- K.A. Weigel, "Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers", Journal of Dairy Science, 92(10), pp.5248~5257 (2009), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
- Gerhard Moser, "Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers", Genetics Selection Evolution, 42(1), pp.37~ (2010), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- S. Koonawootrittriron, "Genetic trends in a Holstein×other breeds multibreed dairy population in Central Thailand", Livestock Science, 122(2-3), pp.186~192 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- F.D. Sargent, "Test Interval Method of Calculating Dairy Herd Improvement Association Records", Journal of Dairy Science, 51(1), pp.170~179 (1968), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
- Koonawootrittriron S, "Prediction of 100-d and 305-d milk yields in a multibreed dairy herd in Thailand using monthly test-day records", Thai J Agric Sci, 34, pp.163~174 (2001)
- "The climate of Thailand"[URL]
- Mehdi Sargolzaei, "A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives", BMC Genomics, 15(1), pp.478~ (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- H. WANG, "Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes", Genetics Research, 94(2), pp.73~83 (2012), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
- "Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs" (2018)[URL]
- I. Misztal, "Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information", Journal of Dairy Science, 92(9), pp.4648~4655 (2009), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
- "Average Information REML with several options including EM-REML and heterogeneous residual variances" (2014)[URL]
- A. Legarra, "A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information", Journal of Dairy Science, 92(9), pp.4656~4663 (2009), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
- Meyer K, "Sampling based approximation of confidence intervals for functions of genetic covariance matrices", Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2013, pp.523~526 (2013)
- M. Haile-Mariam, "Comparison of heritabilities of dairy traits in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle from genomic and pedigree data and implications for genomic evaluations", Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 130(1), pp.20~31 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
- P.M. VanRaden, "Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls", Journal of Dairy Science, 92(1), pp.16~24 (2009), American Dairy Science Association[DOI]
- Chuanyu Sun, "Improvement of Prediction Ability for Genomic Selection of Dairy Cattle by Including Dominance Effects", PLoS ONE, 9(8), pp.e103934~ (2014), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Petrini J, "Genetic parameters for milk fatty acids, milk yield and quality traits of a Holstein cattle population reared under tropical conditions", J Anim Breed Genet, 133, pp.384~395 (2016)
- Hongding Gao, "Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population", Genetics Selection Evolution, 44(1), pp.8~ (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Tobias O. Okeno, "Genetic evaluation of breeding strategies for improvement of dairy cattle in Kenya", Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42(6), pp.1073~1079 (2010), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- M.S. Mokhtari, "Genetic relationship between heifers and cows fertility and milk yield traits in first-parity Iranian Holstein dairy cows", Livestock Science, 182, pp.76~82 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- T. Pritchard, "Genetic parameters for production, health, fertility and longevity traits in dairy cows", animal, 7(1), pp.34~46 (2013), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
- NW Sneddon, "Genetic parameters for milk components including lactose from test day records in the New Zealand dairy herd", New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 58(2), pp.97~107 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Szyda J, "Testing different single nucleotide polymorphism selection strategies for prediction of genomic breeding values in dairy cattle based on low density panels", Czech J Anim Sci, 58, pp.136~145 (2013)
- Paul M. VanRaden, "Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle", Genetics Selection Evolution, 49(1), pp.32~ (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- George R. Wiggans, "Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle: The USDA Experience", Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 5(1), pp.309~327 (2017), Annual Reviews[DOI]
- M.A. Elzo, "Genomic-polygenic and polygenic predictions for nine ultrasound and carcass traits in Angus-Brahman multibreed cattle using three sets of genotypes", Livestock Science, 202, pp.58~66 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]