Effect of visual marbling levels in pork loins on meat quality and Thai consumer acceptance and purchase intent
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: We investigated visual marbling level (VML) influence on pork loin physicochemical traits, consumer palatability responses, VML liking, purchase intent, and their relationships. Methods: For each of five slaughtering dates, at 24-h postmortem, nine paired Duroc castrated male boneless Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles were categorized into low (LM, score 1 to 2, n = 3), medium (MM, score 3 to 4, n = 3), and high (HM, score 5 to 6, n = 3) VML. Meat physicochemical quality traits and consumer responses (n = 389) on palatability and VML liking, and purchase intent were evaluated. The experiment was in randomized complete block design. Analysis of variance, Duncan’s multiple mean comparisons, and correlation coefficients were determined. Results: VML correspond to crude fat (r = 0.91, p<0.01), but both were reversely related to moisture content (r = –0.75 and –0.91, p<0.01, respectively). As VML increased, ash (p<0.05) and protein (p = 0.072) decreased, pH and b* increased (p<0.05), but drip, cooking (p<0.05) and thawing (p = 0.088) losses decreased. Among treatments, muscle fiber diameter, sarcomere length, total and insoluble collagen contents, L*, and a* did not differ (p>0.05). Compared to the others, HM had lower collagen solubility percentage (p<0.05), but similar (p>0.05) Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). No differences (p>0.05) were found in juiciness, overall flavor, oiliness, and overall acceptability, but HM was more tender (p<0.05) than the others. Based on VML, consumers preferred MM to HM (p<0.05), while LM was similar to MM and HM (p>0.05). Corresponding to VML preference (r = 0.45, p<0.01), consumers (83%) would (p<0.01) definitely and probably buy MM, over LM (74%), and HM (68%), respectively. Conclusion: Increasing VML in pork LD altered its chemical composition, slightly increased pH, and improved water holding capacity, thereby improving its tenderness acceptability. Marbling might reduce chewing resistance, as lower collagen solubility in HM did not impact tenderness acceptability and WBSF. While HM was rated as most tender, consumers visually preferred and would purchase MM.
Abstract
Objective: We investigated visual marbling level (VML) influence on pork loin physicochemical traits, consumer palatability responses, VML liking, purchase intent, and their relationships. Methods: For each of five slaughtering dates, at 24-h postmortem, nine paired Duroc castrated male boneless Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles were categorized into low (LM, score 1 to 2, n = 3), medium (MM, score 3 to 4, n = 3), and high (HM, score 5 to 6, n = 3) VML. Meat physicochemical quality traits and consumer responses (n = 389) on palatability and VML liking, and purchase intent were evaluated. The experiment was in randomized complete block design. Analysis of variance, Duncan’s multiple mean comparisons, and correlation coefficients were determined. Results: VML correspond to crude fat (r = 0.91, p<0.01), but both were reversely related to moisture content (r = –0.75 and –0.91, p<0.01, respectively). As VML increased, ash (p<0.05) and protein (p = 0.072) decreased, pH and b* increased (p<0.05), but drip, cooking (p<0.05) and thawing (p = 0.088) losses decreased. Among treatments, muscle fiber diameter, sarcomere length, total and insoluble collagen contents, L*, and a* did not differ (p>0.05). Compared to the others, HM had lower collagen solubility percentage (p<0.05), but similar (p>0.05) Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). No differences (p>0.05) were found in juiciness, overall flavor, oiliness, and overall acceptability, but HM was more tender (p<0.05) than the others. Based on VML, consumers preferred MM to HM (p<0.05), while LM was similar to MM and HM (p>0.05). Corresponding to VML preference (r = 0.45, p<0.01), consumers (83%) would (p<0.01) definitely and probably buy MM, over LM (74%), and HM (68%), respectively. Conclusion: Increasing VML in pork LD altered its chemical composition, slightly increased pH, and improved water holding capacity, thereby improving its tenderness acceptability. Marbling might reduce chewing resistance, as lower collagen solubility in HM did not impact tenderness acceptability and WBSF. While HM was rated as most tender, consumers visually preferred and would purchase MM.
참고문헌 (46)
- (2018)[URL]
- W. Verbeke, "Consumer perception, facts and possibilities to improve acceptability of health and sensory characteristics of pork", Meat Science, 53(2), pp.77~99 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Maria Font-i-Furnols, "Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview", Meat Science, 98(3), pp.361~371 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- S M Lonergan, "Selection for lean growth efficiency in Duroc pigs influences pork quality.", Journal of Animal Science, 79(8), pp.2075~2085 (2001), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- C. R. Schwab, "Effect of long-term selection for increased leanness on meat and eating quality traits in Duroc swine1", Journal of Animal Science, 84(6), pp.1577~1583 (2006), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Tania M. Ngapo, "Factors Affecting the Eating Quality of Pork", Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 48(7), pp.599~633 (2008), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- X Fernandez, "Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat — 1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. longissimus lumborum", Meat Science, 53(1), pp.59~65 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Fernandez X, "Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat—2. Consumer acceptability of m. longissimus lumborum", Meat Sci, 53, pp.67~72 (1999)[DOI]
- M.S Brewer, "Marbling effects on quality characteristics of pork loin chops: consumer purchase intent, visual and sensory characteristics", Meat Science, 59(2), pp.153~163 (2001), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- A. Fortin, "The eating quality of Canadian pork and its relationship with intramuscular fat", Meat Science, 69(2), pp.297~305 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- P. J. Rincker, "Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops1", Journal of Animal Science, 86(3), pp.730~737 (2008), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- S.J. Moeller, "Consumer perceptions of pork eating quality as affected by pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature", Meat Science, 84(1), pp.14~22 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Tania M. Ngapo, "Marbling and ageing — Part 1. Sensory quality of pork", Food Research International, 49(1), pp.396~405 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Genya Watanabe, "Relationship between water-holding capacity and intramuscular fat content in Japanese commercial pork loin", Animal Bioscience, 31(6), pp.914~918 (2018), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- J.D. Wood, "Effects of breed, feed level and conditioning time on the tenderness of pork", Meat Science, 44(1-2), pp.105~112 (1996), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- S. Cannata, "Effect of visual marbling on sensory properties and quality traits of pork loin", Meat Science, 85(3), pp.428~434 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Maria Font-i-Furnols, "Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content", Meat Science, 91(4), pp.448~453 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Ngapo TM, "International preferences for pork appearance: I. Consumer choice", Food Qual Prefer, 18, pp.26~36 (2007)[DOI]
- (2017)[URL]
- Damian Frank, "Consumer Acceptability of Intramuscular Fat", 한국축산식품학회지, 36(6), pp.699~708 (2016), 한국축산식품학회
- (2018)[URL]
- Kim S, "Correction: Uncovering the Nutritional Landscape of Food", PLOS ONE, 10(4), pp.e0127128~ (2015), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- National Pork Board, "Official color & marbling quality standards", National Pork Board, ~ (2011)
- Honikel KO, "Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat", Meat Sci, 49, pp.447~457 (1998)[DOI]
- CIE, "Recommendations on uniform color spaces-color difference equations, psychometric color terms. Suppl 2 to CIE Publication no. 15 (E-1.3.1.) 1978 1971", (TC-1-3), 1976
- T L Wheeler, "A comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force assessment within and among institutions.", Journal of Animal Science, 75(9), pp.2423~ (1997), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- R Boccard, "Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments. Report of a working group in the commission of the European communities' (CEC) beef production research programme", Livestock Production Science, 8(5), pp.385~397 (1981), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- H. J. Tuma, "Relationship of Fiber Diameter to Tenderness and Meatiness as Influenced by Bovine Age", Journal of Animal Science, 21(1), pp.33~36 (1962), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- H.R. Cross, "Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle", Meat Science, 5(4), pp.261~266 (1981), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- F. HILL, "The Solubility of Intramuscular Collagen in Meat Animals of Various Ages", Journal of Food Science, 31(2), pp.161~166 (1966), Wiley[DOI]
- AOAC International, "Official methods of analysis of AOAC International", AOAC International, ~ (2000)
- SPSS, "Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. In: 17.0 SSfWV", SPSS Inc, ~ (2008)
- J.D Wood, "Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review", Meat Science, 66(1), pp.21~32 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- D. L. DeVol, "Variation in Composition and Palatability Traits and Relationships between Muscle Characteristics and Palatability in a Random Sample of Pork Carcasses", Journal of Animal Science, 66(2), pp.385~395 (1988), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Chunbao Li, "Effects of Marbling on Meat Quality Characteristics and Intramuscular Connective Tissue of Beef Longissimus Muscle", Animal Bioscience, 19(12), pp.1799~1808 (2006), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- Toshiaki Okumura, "Effects of Intramuscular Fat on the Sensory Characteristics of M. longissimus dorsi in Japanese Black Steers as Judged by a Trained Analytical Panel", Animal Bioscience, 20(4), pp.577~581 (2007), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- MARIA CRISTINA UTRILLA, "QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF PORK LOIN WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF MARBLING FROM DUROC AND IBERIAN CROSS", Journal of Food Quality, 33(6), pp.802~820 (2010), Wiley[DOI]
- A.M. Smith, "Proximate composition and energy content of beef steaks as influenced by USDA quality grade and degree of doneness", Meat Science, 89(2), pp.228~232 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Okrouhlá M, "Effect of lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of pork", Czech J Food Sci, 26, pp.464~469 (2008)[DOI]
- T L Wheeler, "Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles.", Journal of Animal Science, 78(4), pp.958~965 (2000), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Peter P. Purslow, "Contribution of collagen and connective tissue to cooked meat toughness; some paradigms reviewed", Meat Science, 144, pp.127~134 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Min Du, "Fetal programming in meat production", Meat Science, 109, pp.40~47 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Liisa Voutila, "Comparison of the thermal characteristics of connective tissue in loose structured and normal structured porcine M. semimembranosus", Meat Science, 80(4), pp.1024~1030 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- C. R. Schwab, "Results from six generations of selection for intramuscular fat in Duroc swine using real-time ultrasound. I. Direct and correlated phenotypic responses to selection1", Journal of Animal Science, 87(9), pp.2774~2780 (2009), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Jee-Hwan Choe, "Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements", Animal Bioscience, 29(7), pp.1029~1036 (2016), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- E. Huff-Lonergan, "Correlations among selected pork quality traits", Journal of Animal Science, 80(3), pp.617~627 (2002), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]