본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Association of farmers’ knowledge, attitude and practices with bovine brucellosis seroprevalence in Myanmar

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: This study aimed to identify the relationship between bovine brucellosis prevalence, farmers’ knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP), and social factors on migratory draft cattle and smallholder dairy farms in the central dry zone of Myanmar.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 54 migratory and 38 dairy cattle farms between August 2020 and February 2021. A structured questionnaire was used to identify farmers’ behaviors. Bulk milk was sampled and tested using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA). STATA 17 was used for all the analyses.Results: Migratory cattle farms had a higher farm level brucellosis prevalence (14.8%) than dairy farms (2.6%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.75; df = 1; p = 0.05). Only 2.8% of the farmers had knowledge about brucellosis, while 39.1% and 41.6% had attitudes and farm practices with respect to brucellosis, respectively in the study area. Socio-economic attribute of training in animal husbandry (p<0.01), raising system (p<0.01), practice of separating the aborted cow (p<0.01) were negatively associated to brucellosis. The overall farm level brucellosis prevalence was strongly associated with cattle herd size (p = 0.01), free movement grazing practices (p<0.01), practice of self-removal of placental debris without using personal protective equipment (p<0.01) and farmers' attitudes towards eating cow placenta debris (p<0.01).Conclusion: Farmers had little knowledge of brucellosis. Attitudes and practices differed significantly between migratory and dairy farmers. Training and extension programs are necessary to make farmers aware of their KAP situation since livestock migration and the custom of eating cow placental debris contribute to the spread of brucellosis. Persistent efforts are required to reduce the adverse effects of brucellosis. Therefore, the study suggests that a feasible control intervention and public awareness campaigns need to be conducted regarding methods of preventing human exposure to brucellosis.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify the relationship between bovine brucellosis prevalence, farmers’ knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP), and social factors on migratory draft cattle and smallholder dairy farms in the central dry zone of Myanmar. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 54 migratory and 38 dairy cattle farms between August 2020 and February 2021. A structured questionnaire was used to identify farmers’ behaviors. Bulk milk was sampled and tested using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA). STATA 17 was used for all the analyses. Results: Migratory cattle farms had a higher farm level brucellosis prevalence (14.8%) than dairy farms (2.6%; χ2 = 3.75; df = 1; p = 0.05). Only 2.8% of the farmers had knowledge about brucellosis, while 39.1% and 41.6% had attitudes and farm practices with respect to brucellosis, respectively in the study area. Socio-economic attribute of training in animal husbandry (p<0.01), raising system (p<0.01), practice of separating the aborted cow (p<0.01) were negatively associated to brucellosis. The overall farm level brucellosis prevalence was strongly associated with cattle herd size (p = 0.01), free movement grazing practices (p<0.01), practice of self-removal of placental debris without using personal protective equipment (p<0.01) and farmers' attitudes towards eating cow placenta debris (p<0.01). Conclusion: Farmers had little knowledge of brucellosis. Attitudes and practices differed significantly between migratory and dairy farmers. Training and extension programs are necessary to make farmers aware of their KAP situation since livestock migration and the custom of eating cow placental debris contribute to the spread of brucellosis. Persistent efforts are required to reduce the adverse effects of brucellosis. Therefore, the study suggests that a feasible control intervention and public awareness campaigns need to be conducted regarding methods of preventing human exposure to brucellosis.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. "Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)" (2021)[URL]
  2. "Report of National Livestock baseline survey 2018" (2020)[URL]
  3. Zaw Win TT, "Characteristics of livestock husbandry and management practice in the central dry zone of Myanmar", Trop Anim Health Prod, 51, pp.643~654 (2019)[DOI]
  4. McDermott JJ, "Brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa : epidemiology, control and impact", Vet Microbiol, 90, pp.111~134 (2002)[DOI]
  5. Mohamand N, "Milk ring test for spot identification of Brucella abortus infection in single cow herds", J Adv Vet Anim Res, 1, pp.70~72 (2014)[DOI]
  6. Asakura S, "Brucellosis risks in urban and agro-pastoral areas in Tanzania", Ecohealth, 15, pp.41~51 (2018)[DOI]
  7. Kadohira M, "Variations in the prevalence of antibody to brucella infection in cattle by farm, area and district in Kenya", Epidemiol Infect, 118, pp.35~41 (1997)[DOI]
  8. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), "Brucella melitensis in Eurasia and the Middle East", FAO Animal Production and Health Proceedings, (10) (2009), FAO
  9. Shome R, "Prevalence and risk factors of Brucellosis among veterinary health care professionals", Pathog Glob Health, 111, pp.234~239 (2017)[DOI]
  10. Asakura S, "Herd-level risk factors associated with Brucella sero-positivity in cattle, and perception and behaviours on the disease control among agro-pastoralists in Tanzania", Acta Tropica, 187, pp.99~107 (2018)[DOI]
  11. Makita K, "Quantitative understanding of the decision-making process for farm biosecurity among Japanese livestock farmers using the KAP-Capacity framework", Front Vet Sci, 7, pp.614~ (2020)[DOI]
  12. Kothalawala KAC, "Knowledge, attitudes, and practices(KAP)related to Brucellosis and factors affecting knowledge sharing on animal diseases : a cross-sectional survey in the dry zone of Sri Lanka", Trop Anim Health Prod, 50, pp.983~989 (2018)[DOI]
  13. Tegegn AH, "Small ruminant Brucellosis and public health awareness in two districts of Afar Region, Ethiopia", J Vet Sci Technol, 7, pp.335~ (2016)[DOI]
  14. Kristensen E, "Evaluation of dairy herd health management", Proceedings of the XXVI World Buiatrics Congress, pp.53~64 (2010)
  15. "Animal Health and Development Law" (2020)[URL]
  16. "OIE Webinar on Progress and Challenges in Brucellosis Control in the Asia Pacific Region" (2021)[URL]
  17. Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization for TB Control: a guide to developing knowledge, attitude and practice surveys, "World Health Organization (WHO)", WHO, ~ (2008)
  18. Kyaw H, "Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of farmers and seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle in lewe township", pp.2022
  19. Dohoo I, "Veterinary epidemiologic research" (2014), VER Inc
  20. Thin K, "Seroprevalence and risk analysis of brucellosis in dairy cattle within Mandalay Province", M.V.Sc, pp.2007
  21. Getachew T, "Bayesian estimation of sensitivity and specificity of rose bengal, complement fixation, and indirect ELISA Tests for the Diagnosis of Bovine Brucellosis in Ethiopia", Vet Med Int, 2016, pp.8032753~ (2016)[DOI]
  22. Liao TF, "Interpreting probability models: logit, probit, and other generalized linear model: quantitative applications in the social sciences, 101" (1994), Sage Publications
  23. Pérez Ruano M, "Study of knowledge about bovine Brucellosis among people involved in the cattle supply chain in the province of Manabí. Ecuador", Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz, 36, pp.927~934 (2017)[DOI]
  24. Rajkumar K, "Socio-demographic study on extent of knowledge, awareness, attitude, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock owners in Puducherry region", Vet World, 9, pp.1018~1024 (2016)[DOI]
  25. Than NT, "Prevalence of bovine Brucellosis in dairy cattle in Yangon, Myanmar", pp.2007
  26. Jittapalapong S, "Current status of brucellosis in dairy cows of Chiang Rai Province, Thailand", Agric Nat Resour, 42, pp.67~70 (2008)
  27. Kyaw T, "Seroprevalence and risk analysis of Brucellosis in dairy cattle within Mandalay Province", pp.2007
  28. Makita K, "Herd prevalence of bovine Brucellosis and analysis of risk factors in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas of the Kampala economic zone, Uganda", BMC Vet Res, 7, pp.60~ (2011)[DOI]
  29. Arif S, "Knowledge, attitudes and practices(KAP)relating to brucellosis in smallholder dairy farmers in two provinces in Pakistan", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0173365~ (2017)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle in selected area of Bangladesh and comparison between Rose Bengal test and i-ELISA used for the screening of brucellosis송희종, Amitavo Chakrabartty, Laila Akther, ME Alam, Muhammad Jasim Uddin, Roma Rani Sarker, Siddiqur Rahman, Taohidul Islam한국동물위생학회 · 한국동물위생학회지2012 · 제35권 제2호A sero-surveillance of Brucella spp. antibodies and individual risk factors of infection in cattle in Bangladesh송희종, Md. Shamim Ahasan, Md. Siddiqur Rahman한국동물위생학회 · 한국동물위생학회지2010 · 제33권 제2호Seroprevalence of specific Brucella infection of cattle in Bangladesh Agricultural University Veterinary Clinics and its surrounding areas송희종, A K M Anisur Rahman, Md Shamim Ahasan, Md Siddiqur Rahman, Nur Alam한국동물위생학회 · 한국동물위생학회지2009 · 제32권 제3호Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle송희종, Md. Fazlul Huque, Md. Shamim Ahasan, Md. Siddiqur Rahman한국동물위생학회 · 한국동물위생학회지2010 · 제33권 제2호Relation between brucellosis and husbandry practices in goats in Bangladesh박진호, 송희종, Md Sidiqur Rahman, Mohammad Arif Hssain, Sayeda Hasina Akter, S Majumder, Uuhammad Jasim Uddin한국동물위생학회 · 한국동물위생학회지2007 · 제30권 제2호Is Hiding Foot and Mouth Disease Sensitive Behavior for Farmers? A Survey Study in Sri LankaAnoma Gunarathne, Hiroichi Kono, Kamal Karunagoda, Pradeep Kumarawadu, Satoko Kubota아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2016 · 제29권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)