Cut-Off Scores of an Olfactory Function Test for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective We aimed to find the optimal cut-off scores for screening of odor detection threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification tests for detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Korean elderly.Methods A total of 195 elderly people were divided into three groups: the normal cognition (NC), MCI, and dementia groups. All participants underwent neurocognitive and olfactory function tests. We used k-means cluster analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the most appropriate cut-off value.Results To distinguish the MCI from NC groups, odor identification [area under the curve (AUC)=0.670, p<0.007] with a cut-off point of 7 showed greater validity for screening (sensitivity/specificity=0.462/0.837) than did other olfactory function tests. To distinguish the MCI and dementia from NC as well, odor identification (AUC=0.817, p=0.002) with a cut-off point of 7 showed the highest validity for screening (0.785/0.654). To distinguish MCI from AD, an odor detection threshold (AUC=0.722, p=0.001) with a cut-off point of 2 showed the highest validity for screening (0.785/0.654).Conclusion Olfactory function tests may be a useful screening tool for cognitive decline before clinical symptoms of dementia have completely developed. This tool can be used as a supplementary tool to enhance the sensitivity of traditional cognitive tests to screen for dementia.
Abstract
Objective We aimed to find the optimal cut-off scores for screening of odor detection threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification tests for detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Korean elderly.Methods A total of 195 elderly people were divided into three groups: the normal cognition (NC), MCI, and dementia groups. All participants underwent neurocognitive and olfactory function tests. We used k-means cluster analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the most appropriate cut-off value.Results To distinguish the MCI from NC groups, odor identification [area under the curve (AUC)=0.670, p<0.007] with a cut-off point of 7 showed greater validity for screening (sensitivity/specificity=0.462/0.837) than did other olfactory function tests. To distinguish the MCI and dementia from NC as well, odor identification (AUC=0.817, p=0.002) with a cut-off point of 7 showed the highest validity for screening (0.785/0.654). To distinguish MCI from AD, an odor detection threshold (AUC=0.722, p=0.001) with a cut-off point of 2 showed the highest validity for screening (0.785/0.654).Conclusion Olfactory function tests may be a useful screening tool for cognitive decline before clinical symptoms of dementia have completely developed. This tool can be used as a supplementary tool to enhance the sensitivity of traditional cognitive tests to screen for dementia.
참고문헌 (34)
- Prince M, "The global prevalence of dementia : a systematic review and metaanalysis", Alzheimers Dement, 9, pp.63~75.e62 (2013)
- Boyle PA, "Mild cognitive impairment : risk of Alzheimer disease and rate of cognitive decline", Neurology, 67, pp.441~445 (2006)
- Petersen RC, "Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity", J Intern Med, 256, pp.183~194 (2004)
- Borson S, "Improving dementia care : the role of screening and detection of cognitive impairment", Alzheimers Dement, 9, pp.151~159 (2013)
- Roalf DR, "Comparative accuracies of two common screening instruments for classification of Alzheimer‘s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging", Alzheimers Dement, 9, pp.529~537 (2013)
- Patnode CD, "Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults : updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force", JAMA, 323, pp.764~785 (2020)
- Mitchell AJ, "A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment", J Psychiatr Res, 43, pp.411~431 (2009)
- Fowler NR, "Risks and benefits of screening for dementia in primary care : the Indiana University Cognitive Health Outcomes Investigation of the Comparative Effectiveness of Dementia Screening(IU CHOICE)trial", J Am Geriatr Soc, 68, pp.535~543 (2020)
- Jack CR Jr, "Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade", Lancet Neurol, 9, pp.119~128 (2010)
- Attems J, "Olfactory tau pathology in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment", Clin Neuropathol, 25, pp.265~271 (2006)
- Jack CR Jr, "NIA-AA research framework : toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease", Alzheimers Dement, 14, pp.535~562 (2018)
- Roberts RO, "Association between olfactory dysfunction and amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease dementia", JAMA Neurol, 73, pp.93~101 (2016)
- Conti MZ, "Odor identification deficit predicts clinical conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia due to Alzheimer‘s disease", Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 28, pp.391~399 (2013)
- Sun GH, "Olfactory identification testing as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer’s dementia : a systematic review", Laryngoscope, 122, pp.1455~1462 (2012)
- Makowska I, "Olfactory deficits in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease in the Polish elderly population", Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 26, pp.270~279 (2011)
- Djordjevic J, "Olfaction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease", Neurobiol Aging, 29, pp.693~706 (2008)
- Doty RL, "Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation", pp.850~890 (2003), CRC Press
- Kotecha AM, "Olfactory dysfunction as a global biomarker for sniffing out Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis", Biosensors (Basel), 8, pp.41~ (2018)
- Jung HJ, "Olfactory function in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer‘s disease : a meta-analysis", Laryngoscope, 129, pp.362~369 (2019)
- Rahayel S, "The effect of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease on olfaction : a meta-analysis", Behav Brain Res, 231, pp.60~74 (2012)
- Roalf DR, "A quantitative meta-analysis of olfactory dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 88, pp.226~232 (2017)
- Kovacs T, "Olfactory centres in Alzheimer’s disease : olfactory bulb is involved in early Braak’s stages", Neuroreport, 12, pp.285~288 (2001)
- Chan A, "Utility of olfactory identification test for diagnosing Chinese patients with Alzheimer‘s disease", J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 24, pp.251~259 (2002)
- Eibenstein A, "Olfactory screening test in mild cognitive impairment", Neurol Sci, 26, pp.156~160 (2005)
- Kjelvik G, "Use of the Brief Smell Identification Test for olfactory deficit in a Norwegian population with Alzheimer’s disease", Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 22, pp.1020~1024 (2007)
- Suzuki Y, "Smell identification test as an indicator for cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease", Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 19, pp.727~733 (2004)
- Steinbach S, "Taste in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease", J Neurol, 257, pp.238~246 (2010)
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®)" (2013), American Psychiatric Publishing
- Ha JG, "Normative Values for the YSK Olfactory Function Test and Optimization for the Diagnosis Cut-Off", The 25th Academic Conference of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (2019), Academic Conference of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
- Lee JH, "Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries", J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 57, pp.P47~P53 (2002)
- Hedner M, "Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks", J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 32, pp.1062~1067 (2010)
- Larsson M, "Demographic and cognitive predictors of cued odor identification : evidence from a population-based study", Chem Senses, 29, pp.547~554 (2004)
- Forster S, "Functional representation of olfactory impairment in early Alzheimer’s disease", J Alzheimers Dis, 22, pp.581~591 (2010)
- Hummel T, "Normative data for the"Sniffin’ Sticks"including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds : an upgrade based on a group of more than 3, 000 subjects", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 264, pp.237~243 (2007)
