Analysis of Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate as a Dressing Material after Pediatric Urological Procedures
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (DermabondTM) as a topical skin adhesive for pediatric urologic open surgery. Methods: From August 2010 to August 2011, we retrospectively evaluated pediatric patients who underwent urologic open surgery at our institution. A total of 128 pediatric patients with 210 incisions used DermabondTM for skin closure. Results: We divided the 128 patients into 3 groups according to type of surgery. Group 1 underwent hydrocelectomy (55 cases, 41.3%), Group 2 underwent orchiopexy (43 cases, 32.3%), Group 3 underwent penoplasty (35 cases, 26.4%). One hundred and twenty eight patients who underwent 133 surgeries in total, with a total of 210 incisions visited our outpatient department postoperatively, and a total of 5 wound complications (2.3%) occurred, but were simple inflammations and no dehiscence was observed. When analyzed according to groups, no wound problems occurred in Group 1 (0/55, 0%), one occurred in Group 2 (1/43, 2.3%) and four cases occurred in Group 3 (4/35, 11.4%) respectively. When re-analyzed according to wound locations, one occurred in an inguinal wound (1/120, 0.83%), none occurred in scrotal wounds (0/55, 0%), and four occurred in penile wounds (4/35, 11.4%). In Group 3, the incidence of penile wounds was significantly increased compared to other groups (P=0.008). All 5 wound problems were inflammatory and healed at an average of 13.8 days (13-15 days) with antibiotic ointment application only. Conclusion: DermabondTM is feasible and safe topical skin adhesive alternative to standard skin suture in pediatric urologic surgery. However, further research about its efficacy and safety could be valuable in the future.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (DermabondTM) as a topical skin adhesive for pediatric urologic open surgery. Methods: From August 2010 to August 2011, we retrospectively evaluated pediatric patients who underwent urologic open surgery at our institution. A total of 128 pediatric patients with 210 incisions used DermabondTM for skin closure. Results: We divided the 128 patients into 3 groups according to type of surgery. Group 1 underwent hydrocelectomy (55 cases, 41.3%), Group 2 underwent orchiopexy (43 cases, 32.3%), Group 3 underwent penoplasty (35 cases, 26.4%). One hundred and twenty eight patients who underwent 133 surgeries in total, with a total of 210 incisions visited our outpatient department postoperatively, and a total of 5 wound complications (2.3%) occurred, but were simple inflammations and no dehiscence was observed. When analyzed according to groups, no wound problems occurred in Group 1 (0/55, 0%), one occurred in Group 2 (1/43, 2.3%) and four cases occurred in Group 3 (4/35, 11.4%) respectively. When re-analyzed according to wound locations, one occurred in an inguinal wound (1/120, 0.83%), none occurred in scrotal wounds (0/55, 0%), and four occurred in penile wounds (4/35, 11.4%). In Group 3, the incidence of penile wounds was significantly increased compared to other groups (P=0.008). All 5 wound problems were inflammatory and healed at an average of 13.8 days (13-15 days) with antibiotic ointment application only. Conclusion: DermabondTM is feasible and safe topical skin adhesive alternative to standard skin suture in pediatric urologic surgery. However, further research about its efficacy and safety could be valuable in the future.
참고문헌 (16)
- Rajimwale A, "Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate as a Routine Dressing after Open Pediatric Urological Procedures", The Journal of Urology, 171, pp.2407~2408 (2004)
- Singer AJ, "The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives", The American journal of emergency medicine, 26, pp.490~496 (2008)
- Bruns TB, "Using tissue adhesive for wound repair: a practical guide to dermabond", American Family Physician, 61, pp.1383~1388 (2000)
- Bernard L, "A prospective comparison of octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (dermabond) and suture for the closure of excisional wounds in children and adolescents", Archives of Dermatology, 137, pp.1177~1180 (2001)
- Nahas FX, "The use of tissue adhesive for skin closure in body contouring surgery", Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 28, pp.165~169 (2004)
- Kaye JD, "Sutureless and scalpel-free circumcision--more rapid, less expensive and better?", J Urol, 184(4), pp.1758~1762 (2010)
- Dragu A, "Foreign body reaction after usage of tissue adhesives for skin closure: a case report and review of the literature", Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 129, pp.167~169 (2009)
- Rogerson L, "Preliminary experience with twenty perineal repairs using Indermil tissue adhesive. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology", pp.139~142 (2000)
- Nitsch A, "Cellular, histomorphologic, and clinical characteristics of a new octyl-2-cyanoacrylate skin adhesive", Aesthetic plastic surgery, 29, pp.53~58 (2005)
- Shapiro AJ, "Tensile strength of wound closure with cyanoacrylate glue", The American surgeon, 67, pp.1113~1115 (2001)
- Ferlise VJ, "Use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive under a diaper", BJU international, 87, pp.672~673 (2001)
- van den Ende ED, "Adhesive bonds or percutaneous absorbable suture for closure of surgical wounds in children. Results of a prospective randomized trial", Journal of pediatric surgery, 39, pp.1249~1251 (2004)
- Singer AJ, "Evaluation and management of traumatic lacerations", The New England journal of medicine, 337, pp.1142~1148 (1997)
- Osmond MH, "Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations", The Journal of pediatrics, 126, pp.892~895 (1995)
- Osmond MH, "A randomized, clinical trial comparing butylcyanoacrylate with octylcyanoacrylate in the management of selected pediatric facial lacerations", Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 6, pp.171~177 (1999)
- 이주용, "Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Benign Urologic Disease with a Homemade Single Port Device: Design and Tips for Beginners", Korean Journal of Urology, 53(3), pp.165~170 (2012), 대한비뇨기과학회