Effects on Quality of Life in Patients with Neurogenic Bladder treated with Clean Intermittent Catheterization: Change from Multiple Use Catheter to Single Use Catheter
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate changes in quality of life (QoL) in patients with neurogenic bladder treated with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), who changed from a multiple use catheter (MUC) to single use catheter (SUC). Methods: The Modified Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire (mISC-Q) was used to determine potential changes in patients’ QoL as a result of switching from MUC to SUC. The mISC-Q consists of questions within four categories: ease of use, convenience, discreetness, and symptomatic benefit. Answers were graded as Strongly agree (+2), Agree (+1), Not sure (0), Disagree (-1), and Strongly disagree (-2). Overall patient QoL, as well as by sex, disease (presence of augmentation cystoplasty), and catheterization route (via urethra or urinary diversion), were analyzed. Results: Thirty-eight patients (21M:17F; mean age: 21.7±5.3 y) submitted questionnaires. For ease of use, SUC was significantly better than MUC (score: 0.364, P =0.002) in all patients. Patients with catheterization via the urethra showed significant favor for SUC in ease of use (score: 0.512, P <0.001) and convenience (score: 0.714, P =0.011), but patients with catheterization via the abdominal stoma of urinary diversion gave negative scores in all categories, though no categories were significant. Conclusion: This study suggested that changing from MUC to SUC may lead to improvements in QoL, especially regarding ease of use. This benefit was clearly found in patients with catheterization via urethra rather than abdominal stoma of urinary diversion.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate changes in quality of life (QoL) in patients with neurogenic bladder treated with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), who changed from a multiple use catheter (MUC) to single use catheter (SUC). Methods: The Modified Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire (mISC-Q) was used to determine potential changes in patients’ QoL as a result of switching from MUC to SUC. The mISC-Q consists of questions within four categories: ease of use, convenience, discreetness, and symptomatic benefit. Answers were graded as Strongly agree (+2), Agree (+1), Not sure (0), Disagree (-1), and Strongly disagree (-2). Overall patient QoL, as well as by sex, disease (presence of augmentation cystoplasty), and catheterization route (via urethra or urinary diversion), were analyzed. Results: Thirty-eight patients (21M:17F; mean age: 21.7±5.3 y) submitted questionnaires. For ease of use, SUC was significantly better than MUC (score: 0.364, P =0.002) in all patients. Patients with catheterization via the urethra showed significant favor for SUC in ease of use (score: 0.512, P <0.001) and convenience (score: 0.714, P =0.011), but patients with catheterization via the abdominal stoma of urinary diversion gave negative scores in all categories, though no categories were significant. Conclusion: This study suggested that changing from MUC to SUC may lead to improvements in QoL, especially regarding ease of use. This benefit was clearly found in patients with catheterization via urethra rather than abdominal stoma of urinary diversion.
참고문헌 (13)
- Lapides J, "Clean intermittent selfcatheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease", J Urol, 107, pp.458~461 (1972)
- Hellstrom P, "Efficacy and safety of clean intermittent catheterization in adults", Eur Urol, 20, pp.117~121 (1991)
- Kanaheswari Y, "Urinary tract infection and bacteriuria in children performing clean intermittent catheterization with reused catheters", Spinal Cord, 53, pp.209~212 (2015)
- Schlager TA, "Effect of a single-use sterile catheter for each void on the frequency of bacteriuria in children with neurogenic bladder on intermittent catheterization for bladder emptying", Pediatrics, 108, pp.1~4 (2001)
- Morris LS, "Medication compliance: the patient's perspective", Clin Ther, 15, pp.593~606 (1993)
- Everaert K, "Urinary tract infections in spinal cord injury: prevention and treatment guidelines", Acta Clin Belg, 64, pp.335~340 (2009)
- Dorsher PT, "Neurogenic bladder", Adv Urol (2012)
- Wyndaele JJ, "Complications of intermittent catheterization: their prevention and treatment", Spinal Cord, 40, pp.536~541 (2002)
- Diokno AC, "Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization", J Urol, 153, pp.349~351 (1995)
- Pinder B, "Development and psychometric validation of the intermittent selfcatheterization questionnaire", Clin Ther, 34, pp.2302~2313 (2012)
- Guinet-Lacoste A, "Intermittent catheterization difficulty questionnaire (ICDQ): A new tool for the evaluation of patient difficulties with clean intermittent self-catheterization", Neurourol Urodyn, 35, pp.85~89 (2016)
- Elder JS, "Perforation of the augmented bladder in patients undergoing clean intermittent catheterization", J Urol, 140, pp.1159~1162 (1988)
- Joseph DB, "Clean, intermittent catheterization of infants with neurogenic bladder", Pediatrics, 84, pp.78~82 (1989)