The Effects of Low Volume Versus High Volume Sled-Push Training on Muscular Adaptation
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effects of low-volume and high-volume sled-push resistance training on muscle strength, power, and body composition. METHODS: Twenty-four college students were recruited and matched based on baseline one-repetition maximum (1-RM) into one of the three groups: 1) low volume (LV) resistance training, 2) high volume (HV) resistance training, or 3) control (CON) (n=8 per group). The LV training consisted of five single repetitions of pushing a weighted sled for 9.1 m. The HV training consisted of three sets of five repetitions of pushing a weighted sled for 9.1 m. Training consisted of three weekly workouts performed on nonconsecutive days for 6 weeks. This study utilized a pre-test and post-test design consisting of 1-RM, Wingate power test, standing long jump, vertical jump, and body composition. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of training, there was a similar but significant increase in 1-RM in both training groups (pre-test: LV=226.8±14.8 kg vs. HV=217.7±19.5 kg; post-test: LV=298.5±15 kg vs. HV=286.9±16 kg, p<.001). However, no improvements were observed in the Wingate power test, standing long jump, vertical jump, or body composition in both training and CON groups (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that low-volume resistance training was as effective as a high-volume protocol for improving muscle strength. However, the present study was unable to determine the effects on muscle power and body composition.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effects of low-volume and high-volume sled-push resistance training on muscle strength, power, and body composition. METHODS: Twenty-four college students were recruited and matched based on baseline one-repetition maximum (1-RM) into one of the three groups: 1) low volume (LV) resistance training, 2) high volume (HV) resistance training, or 3) control (CON) (n=8 per group). The LV training consisted of five single repetitions of pushing a weighted sled for 9.1 m. The HV training consisted of three sets of five repetitions of pushing a weighted sled for 9.1 m. Training consisted of three weekly workouts performed on nonconsecutive days for 6 weeks. This study utilized a pre-test and post-test design consisting of 1-RM, Wingate power test, standing long jump, vertical jump, and body composition. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of training, there was a similar but significant increase in 1-RM in both training groups (pre-test: LV=226.8±14.8 kg vs. HV=217.7±19.5 kg; post-test: LV=298.5±15 kg vs. HV=286.9±16 kg, p<.001). However, no improvements were observed in the Wingate power test, standing long jump, vertical jump, or body composition in both training and CON groups (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that low-volume resistance training was as effective as a high-volume protocol for improving muscle strength. However, the present study was unable to determine the effects on muscle power and body composition.
참고문헌 (12)
- Houtman CJ, "Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations", J Appl Physiol, 95(3), pp.1045~1054 (2003)[DOI]
- Richens B, "The relationship between the number of repetitions performed at given intensities is different in endurance and strength trained athletes", Biol Sport, 31(2), pp.157~161 (2014)[DOI]
- Winwood PW, "Strongman vs. traditional resistance training effects on muscular function and performance", J Strength Cond Res, 29(2), pp.429~439 (2015)[DOI]
- 윤아람, "Comparison of Multiple Sets and Progressive Single Set of Resistance Training on Muscle Mass and Strength in Rat", 운동과학, 24(3), pp.267~274 (2015), 한국운동생리학회[DOI]
- Bompa T, "Periodization training for sports" (2015), Human Kinetics
- Abe T, "Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women", Eur J Appl Physiol, 81(3), pp.174~180 (2000)[DOI]
- DeFreitas, JM, "An examination of the time course of training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy", Eur J Appl Physiol, 111(11), pp.2785~2790 (2011)[DOI]
- Maden-Wilkinson TM, "Comparison of MRI and DXA to measure muscle size and age-related atrophy in thigh muscles", J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 13(3), pp.320~328 (2013)
- Folland JP, "The adaptations to strength training : morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength", Sports Med, 37(2), pp.145~168 (2007)[DOI]
- Gabriel DA, "Neural adaptations to resistive exercise : mechanisms and recommendations for training practices", Sports Med, 36(2), pp.133~149 (2006)[DOI]
- Otto WH, "Effects of weightlifting vs. kettlebell training on vertical jump, strength, and body composition", J Strength Cond Res, 26(5), pp.1199~1202 (2012)[DOI]
- Romero-Arenas S, "Neuromuscular and cardiovascular adaptations in response to high intensity interval power training", J Strength Cond Res, 32(1), pp.130~138 (2018)[DOI]
