본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

프로그램 교육목표 평가 모형과 성취도 측정에 관한 연구

A Study on the Measurement of performance and Evaluation model to achieve the Program Education Objectives

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

In this paper, the evaluation system in order to achieve the program education objectives of Accreditation Board for engineering education of Korea, analyze the educational objectives evaluation tool case studies of programs that are run by each university, the program educational objectives to match the actual situation of university I have developed a distinction between questions the evaluation and assessment system. Configuration, execution, measurement, analysis, is a five-step mooring, the evaluation tool, is a graduate research you are currently using the most in Korea, the employer survey, education target assessment model of the program, employment trends of graduates, I decided to graduate focus group interviews. Distinction between questions, the evaluation also developed a questionnaire to derive the important keywords of education for each objectives. Improvement evaluation tool, the evaluation criteria is required, the University is preparing evaluate (NGR) in South Korea engineering education certification next regularly, requires research on semantic analysis of the results of measurement of the educational goals of the program in the future some.

Abstract

In this paper, the evaluation system in order to achieve the program education objectives of Accreditation Board for engineering education of Korea, analyze the educational objectives evaluation tool case studies of programs that are run by each university, the program educational objectives to match the actual situation of university I have developed a distinction between questions the evaluation and assessment system. Configuration, execution, measurement, analysis, is a five-step mooring, the evaluation tool, is a graduate research you are currently using the most in Korea, the employer survey, education target assessment model of the program, employment trends of graduates, I decided to graduate focus group interviews. Distinction between questions, the evaluation also developed a questionnaire to derive the important keywords of education for each objectives. Improvement evaluation tool, the evaluation criteria is required, the University is preparing evaluate (NGR) in South Korea engineering education certification next regularly, requires research on semantic analysis of the results of measurement of the educational goals of the program in the future some.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 성태제, "타당도와 신뢰도" (2002), 학지사
  2. 성태제, "문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제" (2003), 학지사
  3. 한국공학교육인증원, "공학인증기준설명서", ~ (2005)
  4. 인증 실효성 확보 방안 연구, "성균관대학교 공학교육혁신센터", ~ (2010)
  5. 김명랑, "한국공학교육인증의 '프로그램 교육목표' 달성을 위한 평가 모형 개발", 공학교육연구, 11(2), pp.42~49 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  6. 이강우, "교육목표와 학습성과 평가를 통한 프로그램 운영 방안에 대한 연구", 공학교육연구, 12(2), pp.71~82 (2009), 한국공학교육학회
  7. 정은수, "국내외 공과대학들의 교육목표 분석", 공학교육연구, 11(3), pp.44~53 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  8. 김한종, "프로그램 교육목표 평가도구 개발에 관한 연구", 한국실천공학교육학회논문지, 12(2), pp.41~46 (2011)
  9. 인하대학교 공학교육혁신센터, "프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 개선", ~ (2011)
  10. 한국공학교육인증원 2011 연차보고서, "한국공학교육인증원", ~ (2011)
  11. 박경선, "단국대학교 프로그램 교육목표 평가시스템 운영 사례", 제33회 공학교육인증포럼 (2012)
  12. 정진우, "동국대학교 컴퓨터공학심화프로그램 인증운영사례", 제37회 공학교육인증포럼 (2013)
  13. 권숙진, "프로그램 교육목표 평가에 관한 사례연구: 공학교육인증평가 중심으로", 학습과학연구, 6(3), pp.72~94 (2012), 교육공학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)