본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

청소년지도자의 옹호활동수행에 관한 예측모형 - 기관특성, 자기효능감, 정치효능감 변인을 중심으로-

A Study on the predictional model of Youth leaders to carry out advocacy activities - focusing on organization characteristics, self-efficacy, political efficacy variables -

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

In this study, previous studies the existing advocacy organizations identified as factors affecting the properties(the state agency supervision of the firm, participation in decision-making), self-efficacy, political efficacy variables perform advocacy activities focusing on the impact of youth leaders. To evaluate the predictive model is during the month of June 2009 and 7 national youth-related agencies and organizations working in the purposive sampling to target youth leaders called for a total of 159 were analyzed. The results are part of the leaders of youth organizations in the state supervision of the firm on average 3.86 (SD = .95) was higher than the average level of participation in decision-making 2. 78 (SD = 1.20) was found to be less than the normal level. In addition, self-efficacy of youth leaders averaged 3. 51 points (SD = .901) was higher than the average, self-efficacy areas of expertise average 3.46 points (SD = .94) an average 3.57 points to practice skills areas (SD = .84) than the more narrowly was found to be low. Youth leaders' political efficacy and the average score of 3.42 points (SD = .98) was performed advocacy activities averaged 3.03 (SD = 1.00) than the normal level was found. Perform advocacy activities of youth leaders around the state and the institutions supervision firm to participate in decisions, self-efficacy and a statistically significant positive correlation was found to perform advocacy activities of youth leaders in the models predicting self-efficacy and decision-making authority on the rights of the variables was found to be very important. Based on these findings, perform advocacy activities in youth leadership development plan and proposed recommendations.

Abstract

In this study, previous studies the existing advocacy organizations identified as factors affecting the properties(the state agency supervision of the firm, participation in decision-making), self-efficacy, political efficacy variables perform advocacy activities focusing on the impact of youth leaders. To evaluate the predictive model is during the month of June 2009 and 7 national youth-related agencies and organizations working in the purposive sampling to target youth leaders called for a total of 159 were analyzed. The results are part of the leaders of youth organizations in the state supervision of the firm on average 3.86 (SD = .95) was higher than the average level of participation in decision-making 2. 78 (SD = 1.20) was found to be less than the normal level. In addition, self-efficacy of youth leaders averaged 3. 51 points (SD = .901) was higher than the average, self-efficacy areas of expertise average 3.46 points (SD = .94) an average 3.57 points to practice skills areas (SD = .84) than the more narrowly was found to be low. Youth leaders' political efficacy and the average score of 3.42 points (SD = .98) was performed advocacy activities averaged 3.03 (SD = 1.00) than the normal level was found. Perform advocacy activities of youth leaders around the state and the institutions supervision firm to participate in decisions, self-efficacy and a statistically significant positive correlation was found to perform advocacy activities of youth leaders in the models predicting self-efficacy and decision-making authority on the rights of the variables was found to be very important. Based on these findings, perform advocacy activities in youth leadership development plan and proposed recommendations.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 강현기, "사회복지 전공학생들의 가치성향 분석", 석사, pp.1999
  2. 강흥수, "정치적 효능감 개념에 대한 심리학적 재조명", 1998년 한국정치학회 연례학술회의, pp.245~267 (1998)
  3. 구선영, "사회복지관 사회복지사의 옹호활동에 영향을 미치는 변인에 관한 탐색적 연구", 석사, pp.2005
  4. 김병년, "한국 사회복지사의 사회복지옹호활동에 관한 연구:복지태도와 정치효능감과의 관계를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
  5. 김윤나, "청소년지도자의 옹호활동 실태 및 관련요인 분석", 미래청소년학회지, 7(3), pp.45~67 (2010), 미래를 여는 청소년학회
  6. 노혁, "빈곤청소년의 사회적 배제와 청소년복지정책의 방향", 미래청소년학회지, 6(3), pp.23~43 (2009), 미래를 여는 청소년학회
  7. 박영신, "자기효능감과 삶의 질" (2001), 교육과학사
  8. 박상호, "미디어 신뢰도와 정치행태에 관한 연구:대학생들의 정치 참여행위를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2005
  9. 송진옥, "전문직 사회복지사의 직업윤리와 가치에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2001
  10. 안병만, "농촌주민의 정치적 태도 : 정치효능과 정치신뢰", 한국정치학회보, pp.135~146 (1987)
  11. 안소현, "퇴원과 관련된 정신장애인의 자기결정권에 대한 사회사업가의 인식과 태도연구", 석사, pp.1999
  12. 엄미선, "도시빈민의 임파워먼트를 위한 자기옹호 전략에 관한 연구", 사회복지리뷰 (2002)
  13. 오끼다가요꼬, "일본 복지사무소의 워커들의 윤리적 딜레마와 의사결정에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1994
  14. 윤민화, "사회복지사의 임파워먼트에 관한 연구:지역사회복지관의 사회복지사를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1999
  15. 이명현, "사회복지에서의 이용자 지원을 위한 권리옹호(Advocacy) 시스템에 대한 고찰", 한국사회복지학, 56(2), pp.29~52 (2004), 한국사회복지학회
  16. 이태영, "사회복지사들의 사회행동에 대한 태도 및 행위 조사연구", 한국사회복지학, 49, pp.62~94 (2002), 한국사회복지학회
  17. 이현주, "사회복지 전문직 종사자의 윤리적 갈등에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2000
  18. 전명기, "지속가능한 발전과 청소년: ‘의제 21’(Agenda 21)을 중심으로, in 청소년문화, 그 이해와 바로 세우기" (2000), 영산원불교대학교 출판국
  19. 전명기, "전통사회 통과의례와 청소년 존재 개념", 청소년학연구, 11(2), pp.399~418 (2004), 한국청소년학회
  20. 전선영, "사회복지 교육과 사회복지 가치 및 옹호의 관계에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  21. 조휘일, "지역사회취약계층 클라이언트를 위한 옹호(Advocacy) 활동전략 및 과정에 관한 연구", 한국지역사회복지학회, 13, pp.173~194 (2003)
  22. 최금주, "사회복지사가 경험하는 윤리적 딜레마와 의사결정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2001
  23. 최말옥, "정신장애인의 임파워먼트 증진을 위한 자기옹호 프로그램의 효과", 박사, pp.2002
  24. 최종후, "Answer Tree를 이용한 데이터마이닝 의사결정나무분석" (2000), SPSS 아카데미
  25. 홍현미라, "도시저소득층지역의 지역사회조직실천에 대한 비교사례 연구", 석사, pp.1998
  26. Ain,E.J, "Ethical Dilemmas of New York City Social Workers" (2001), Yeshiva University
  27. Bandura, "Self-Efficacy: Towards a Unifying Theory and the Organization", Psychological Review, 84, pp.191~215 (1977)
  28. Crabtree,Craig Randall, "Who We Really Are: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Professional Attainment and Social Work Values", 박사, pp.2000
  29. Davis,K.E, "The Need for Social Workers to Advocate", Virginia NASW Newsletter, 4 (1993)
  30. Delk,M.A, "Study of the Differences in and Practice of Advocacy among Clinical social Wokrers, Marriage and Family Therapists, and Mental Health Counselors", 박사, pp.2002
  31. Department for Education and Employment, "Transforming Youth Work:Developing youth work for young people" (2001), DfEE Publications
  32. Finkel,S.E, "Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy:A panel analysis", American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), pp.891~913 (1987)
  33. Frumkin, M, "Social Work Education, in Encydopedia of Social Work" (1995), NASW Press
  34. Hamilton, D, "Social Workers' Participation: Strengthening The Political Confidence of Social Work Students", Social Work Education, 37(2) (2001)
  35. Mandell,B.R, "Firing up Students for Social Change: Some Teaching Tactics for the 1990s", Journal of progressive Human Services, 3(1) (1992), Pergamon Press
  36. Mark Edward Braun, "Social Change and The Empowerment of the Poor: Poverty Representation in Milwaukee's Community Action Programs", pp.154~232 (1999), The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
  37. Mickelson,J.S, "Advocacy, in Encydopedia of Social Work" (1995), NASW Press
  38. Pittman, K, "Preventing problems, promoting development, encouraging engagement: Competing priorities or inseparable goals?" (2001), The Forum for Youth Investment, International Youth Foundation
  39. Radian,E, "Social Action and Social Work Education in Canada", 박사, pp.2000
  40. Reeser,L.C, "Professionalization and Social Activism", 박사, pp.1986
  41. Reisch,M, "Social Workers and Politics in the New Century", Social Work, 45(4) (2000)
  42. Saleebey,D, "The Strengths Perspective in Social Work" (1992), Longman Publishing Group
  43. Specht, H, "Unfaithful Angels:How Social Worker has Abandoned its Mission" (1994), Free Press
  44. Sweatt,L.I, "An Exploration of Psychologists' Social and Professional Advocacy Attitudes and Involvement", 박사, pp.1999

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)