본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수업에 대한 교수의 자기평가와 학생평가의 비교를 통한 공과대학 수업개선 방안 연구

A Study on Suggesting Directions for Course Improvement at College of Engineering Based on Comparison of Instructors’ Self Evaluation and Students’ Evaluation of Courses

1

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The purpose of this study is to explore directions for improvement of teaching at college of engineering based on analysis of differences from course evaluation of students and instructors. Data was collected from 86 instructors’ ratings on courses and their 3004 students’ ratings on courses at college of engineering in a two-year, a three-year college and a University from 2010 to 2013. The results of the survey indicate significant differences in the statistics from the several questions between the instructors and the students as well as between the course in a two-year, a three-year college and in a University. First, instructors’ self evaluation of the course is higher than students’ satisfaction ratings of the course on the average. Instructors’ self evaluation are high on the questions ‘The subject was proper for the course’, ‘The course provided the latest theory and trend of the field’, and ‘Fairness and objectivity about the exams and the assignments'. Also, the difference between Instructors and students on the questions is significant in the statistics. The professor must make sure that students know well how to organize the course content and the method for feedback to test result and homework. Second, instructors have higher satisfaction ratings on the six questions and students have higher satisfaction ratings on the one question(‘Make students participate in the class effectively’) at a two-year and a three-year college. However, students have higher satisfaction ratings on the three questions(‘Make students participate in the class effectively’, ‘Concern about students’ learning process’, and ‘Use of E-learning and media equipments’) and instructors have higher satisfaction ratings on the one question. It means instructors at a University feel pressure on a teaching and they are unsatisfied with their teaching skills. Third, the result of comparing six parts of the questions shows that students’ satisfaction ratings are higher on ‘Students participation’ and ‘Application of media equipments’ parts whereas instructors’ self evaluation are higher on ‘Exams and assignments’ part. Fourth, the question ‘Make students participate in the class effectively’ is significant in statistic based on comparison of instructors and students, and comparison of in a college and a University. Students’ satisfaction ratings are higher than instructors’ self evaluation.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore directions for improvement of teaching at college of engineering based on analysis of differences from course evaluation of students and instructors. Data was collected from 86 instructors’ ratings on courses and their 3004 students’ ratings on courses at college of engineering in a two-year, a three-year college and a University from 2010 to 2013. The results of the survey indicate significant differences in the statistics from the several questions between the instructors and the students as well as between the course in a two-year, a three-year college and in a University. First, instructors’ self evaluation of the course is higher than students’ satisfaction ratings of the course on the average. Instructors’ self evaluation are high on the questions ‘The subject was proper for the course’, ‘The course provided the latest theory and trend of the field’, and ‘Fairness and objectivity about the exams and the assignments'. Also, the difference between Instructors and students on the questions is significant in the statistics. The professor must make sure that students know well how to organize the course content and the method for feedback to test result and homework. Second, instructors have higher satisfaction ratings on the six questions and students have higher satisfaction ratings on the one question(‘Make students participate in the class effectively’) at a two-year and a three-year college. However, students have higher satisfaction ratings on the three questions(‘Make students participate in the class effectively’, ‘Concern about students’ learning process’, and ‘Use of E-learning and media equipments’) and instructors have higher satisfaction ratings on the one question. It means instructors at a University feel pressure on a teaching and they are unsatisfied with their teaching skills. Third, the result of comparing six parts of the questions shows that students’ satisfaction ratings are higher on ‘Students participation’ and ‘Application of media equipments’ parts whereas instructors’ self evaluation are higher on ‘Exams and assignments’ part. Fourth, the question ‘Make students participate in the class effectively’ is significant in statistic based on comparison of instructors and students, and comparison of in a college and a University. Students’ satisfaction ratings are higher than instructors’ self evaluation.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김성숙, "학기중 적용을 위한 강의진단 평가도구 개발과 타당성 분석", 교육평가연구, 21(1), pp.55~78 (2008), 한국교육평가학회
  2. 대학학사과정 강의평가제 실태분석을 통한교육업적 평가모형 개발 연구, "김성열", 교육인적자원부, ~, pp.교육정책연구, 2001.-일-30 (2001)
  3. 김진화, "대학교육환경이 학생들의 강의평가에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : Y대학교 강의평가를 대상으로", 석사, 경영정보, pp.2009
  4. 김학일, "이공계 강의평가 결과의 실증적 분석을 통한 강의평가제도 개선방안", 공학교육연구, 10(4), pp.58~77 (2007), 한국공학교육학회
  5. 김현철, "분산분석과 범주형 자료 분석에 의한 강의평가 결정요인의 탐색", 한국교육, 33(3), pp.121~144 (2006), 한국교육개발원
  6. 류춘호, "강의평가 설문문항의 개발에 관한 연구", 경영연구, 26, pp.339~389 (2000), 홍익대학교 교육연구소
  7. 류춘호, "강의평가와 관련한 의사결정요인에 관한 연구", 경영연구, 27, pp.235~252 (2002)
  8. 민혜리, "학생들이 인식하는 좋은 강의의 특성 연구 : 국내 대학과 해외 대학의 강의 체험 분석을 중심으로", 열린교육연구, 19(1), pp.57~88 (2011), 한국열린교육학회
  9. 민혜리, "공과대학 학생들의 수업에 대한 요구와 만족도에 근거한 공과대학 수업개선 방안 탐색", 공학교육연구, 12(4), pp.38~45 (2009), 한국공학교육학회
  10. 백순근, "위계선형모형을 활용한 대학생의 강의평가 분석 - S대학교 교양강의를 중심으로 -", 교육평가연구, 21(2), pp.1~24 (2008), 한국교육평가학회
  11. 염시창, "대학 강의평가도구의 타당화 및 관련 변인의 다층분석", 교육평가연구, 21(2), pp.25~52 (2008), 한국교육평가학회
  12. 오은주, "강의평가 실태조사를 통한 강의평가 개선 방향 연구", 교육방법연구, 21(2), pp.1~20 (2009), 한국교육방법학회
  13. 윤소정, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 학생들의 에세이 분석", 한국교육, 36(4), pp.125~149 (2009), 한국교육개발원
  14. 이선아, "강의평가에 대한 대학생들의 인식 분석", 석사, 교육학, pp.2011
  15. 이성흠, "교수설계 이론에 근거한 대학 강의평가 도구개발을 위한 기초연구", 교육공학연구, 17(1), pp.81~108 (2001)
  16. 이용숙, "베스트 티쳐상 수상 교수수업의 유형과 특징: 서술적 관찰 결과", 덕성여자대학교 제2회 근화세미나 자료집, pp.1~38 (2009)
  17. 이은화, "좋은 대학수업의 특징과 그 의미: 한국 대학생의 관점에서", 교육사상연구, 22(1), pp.123~146 (2008), 한국교육사상연구회
  18. 이희원, "대학 강의 질 개선을 위한 강의 평가 문항 분석 : 서울대학교 이공계열 교양과목을 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 8(4), pp.52~64 (2005)
  19. 장영주, "대학 강의평가제도에 대한 교수와 학생의 인식 분석", 석사, 교육행정및고등교육전공, pp.2012
  20. 지은림, "대학 교수자를 위한 강의자가진단도구 개발의타당화 및 관련변인 분석", 교육평가연구, 19(1), pp.51~72 (2006), 한국교육평가학회
  21. 한신일, "학생에 의한 강의평가의 관련요인 분석", 교육행정학연구, 19(4), pp.247~266 (2001)
  22. 황세명, "대학 강의평가에서 문항 추출에 관한 연구", 공학교육연구, 8(1), pp.31~45 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)