CDIO 기준과 한국 공학교육 인증기준의 비교
A Comparison of the CDIO Standards and ABEEK Criteria
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating (CDIO) initiative is a worldwide organization with members from over 120 institutions for higher education, and it provides an innovative educational framework for producing the next generation of engineers. This paper compares the CDIO standards and syllabus to the accreditation criteria of Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea, ABEEK to identify similarities and differences and to find points of improvement for ABEEK criteria. It is found that the basic concepts of ABEEK criteria correlates well with those of CDIO standards, while the CDIO standards and syllabus provide more detailed and well-defined guidelines for engineering programs. Finally, some discussions are presented on the differences between the two educational models, a voluntary-based CDIO model and an accreditation-based ABEEK model.
Abstract
The Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating (CDIO) initiative is a worldwide organization with members from over 120 institutions for higher education, and it provides an innovative educational framework for producing the next generation of engineers. This paper compares the CDIO standards and syllabus to the accreditation criteria of Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea, ABEEK to identify similarities and differences and to find points of improvement for ABEEK criteria. It is found that the basic concepts of ABEEK criteria correlates well with those of CDIO standards, while the CDIO standards and syllabus provide more detailed and well-defined guidelines for engineering programs. Finally, some discussions are presented on the differences between the two educational models, a voluntary-based CDIO model and an accreditation-based ABEEK model.
참고문헌 (11)
- "CDIO INITIATIVE"[URL]
- "CDIO INITIATIVE"[URL]
- "(사)한국공학교육인증원"[URL]
- Edward F. Crawley, "The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education", Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference (2011)
- "2018년 인증평가 적용 공학교육인증기준 (KEC2015)"[URL]
- (사)한국공학교육인증원, "2018년도 KEC2015 인증평가 판정가이드", 2018년 평가단 업무 매뉴얼, ~ (2018)
- "2018년 교육기관 자체평가보고서 양식(KEC2015)"[URL]
- 강상희, "2014년 인증평가 결과 분석: EAC 프로그램의 결함 판정 사유를 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 18(5), pp.32~41 (2015), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- Crawley, E. F., "Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach" (2007), Springer-Verlag
- Johan Malmqvist, "A Comparison of the CDIO and EUR-ACE Quality Assurance System", Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference (2009)
- "CDIO and Accreditation in Japan" (2011)[URL]